Frailty assessment in acute spinal cord injury surgery: Insights from the risk analysis index and broader neurosurgical context.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Omar Sbaih, Stefan Prvulovic, Shubhang Bhalla, Michael Covell, Christian A Bowers
{"title":"Frailty assessment in acute spinal cord injury surgery: Insights from the risk analysis index and broader neurosurgical context.","authors":"Omar Sbaih, Stefan Prvulovic, Shubhang Bhalla, Michael Covell, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2554011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Context:</b> Frailty has emerged as a key determinant of surgical outcomes, surpassing chronological age and comorbidity indices in prognostic value. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI), a multidomain frailty assessment tool, has shown strong predictive utility in spine surgery. Recent analyses specifically evaluated RAI in urgent surgical intervention for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), where timely outcome prediction is critical.<b>Findings:</b> In 10,000 SCI patients, frailty demonstrated a graded association with adverse 30-day outcomes. Mortality increased from 1.5% in robust individuals (RAI 0-20) to 11.8% in very frail patients (RAI >41), paralleled by increased non-home discharge and complications. The RAI consistently outperformed the modified frailty index (mFI-5), achieving c-statistics >0.72 for mortality and discharge outcomes. These results align with broader spine surgery literature, where the RAI has demonstrated superior discrimination compared to mFI-5 across elective cases, degenerative conditions, spinal deformity, and tumor surgery. Predictive strength reflects incorporation of functional and nutritional domains, which comorbidity-based indices miss. Importantly, RAI-based analyses have identified high-risk subsets even in lower-risk cohorts, such as anterior cervical discectomy, underscoring its generalizability.<b>Conclusion/Clinical Relevance:</b> The RAI reliably predicts short-term outcomes after SCI and across diverse spine surgery populations, outperforming simpler frailty measures. Its integration into neurosurgical assessment enables more accurate risk stratification, informs perioperative management, and supports shared decision-making. Routine use of the RAI may guide multidisciplinary optimization and resource allocation, and future interventions targeting frail patients may leverage its predictive capacity to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2554011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Frailty has emerged as a key determinant of surgical outcomes, surpassing chronological age and comorbidity indices in prognostic value. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI), a multidomain frailty assessment tool, has shown strong predictive utility in spine surgery. Recent analyses specifically evaluated RAI in urgent surgical intervention for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), where timely outcome prediction is critical.Findings: In 10,000 SCI patients, frailty demonstrated a graded association with adverse 30-day outcomes. Mortality increased from 1.5% in robust individuals (RAI 0-20) to 11.8% in very frail patients (RAI >41), paralleled by increased non-home discharge and complications. The RAI consistently outperformed the modified frailty index (mFI-5), achieving c-statistics >0.72 for mortality and discharge outcomes. These results align with broader spine surgery literature, where the RAI has demonstrated superior discrimination compared to mFI-5 across elective cases, degenerative conditions, spinal deformity, and tumor surgery. Predictive strength reflects incorporation of functional and nutritional domains, which comorbidity-based indices miss. Importantly, RAI-based analyses have identified high-risk subsets even in lower-risk cohorts, such as anterior cervical discectomy, underscoring its generalizability.Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: The RAI reliably predicts short-term outcomes after SCI and across diverse spine surgery populations, outperforming simpler frailty measures. Its integration into neurosurgical assessment enables more accurate risk stratification, informs perioperative management, and supports shared decision-making. Routine use of the RAI may guide multidisciplinary optimization and resource allocation, and future interventions targeting frail patients may leverage its predictive capacity to improve outcomes.

急性脊髓损伤手术中的衰弱评估:来自风险分析指数和更广泛的神经外科背景的见解。
背景:虚弱已经成为手术结果的关键决定因素,在预后价值上超过了实足年龄和合并症指数。风险分析指数(RAI)是一种多领域脆弱性评估工具,在脊柱外科中显示出强大的预测效用。最近的分析特别评估了急性外伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)的紧急手术干预中的RAI,及时预测结果至关重要。结果:在10,000名SCI患者中,虚弱表现出与30天不良结果的分级关联。死亡率从强壮个体(RAI 0-20)的1.5%上升到非常虚弱患者(RAI bbb41)的11.8%,并伴有非家庭出院和并发症的增加。RAI的表现始终优于修改后的衰弱指数(mFI-5),死亡率和出院结果的c统计值为0.72。这些结果与更广泛的脊柱外科文献一致,在这些文献中,RAI在选择性病例、退行性疾病、脊柱畸形和肿瘤手术中表现出优于mFI-5的辨别能力。预测强度反映了功能和营养领域的结合,这是基于合并症的指数所忽略的。重要的是,基于rai的分析已经确定了高风险亚群,甚至在低风险队列中,如前路颈椎椎间盘切除术,强调了其普遍性。结论/临床意义:RAI可靠地预测脊髓损伤后和不同脊柱手术人群的短期预后,优于简单的虚弱指标。将其整合到神经外科评估中,可以更准确地进行风险分层,为围手术期管理提供信息,并支持共同决策。常规使用RAI可以指导多学科优化和资源分配,未来针对虚弱患者的干预可以利用其预测能力来改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信