Birth intervals and childhood mortality in rural Tanzania.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Colin Baynes, Almamy Malick Kanté, Sigilbert Mrema, Honorati Masanja, James F Phillips
{"title":"Birth intervals and childhood mortality in rural Tanzania.","authors":"Colin Baynes, Almamy Malick Kanté, Sigilbert Mrema, Honorati Masanja, James F Phillips","doi":"10.1017/S0021932025100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family planning programmes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) often disseminate the proposition that birth spacing improves child survival. Yet, there are few examinations of this hypothesis that benefit from longitudinal data. This paper addresses this gap using 15 years of prospective data from three rural districts of Tanzania. The effect of birth interval durations on the risk of childhood mortality was estimated by fitting Weibull parametric hazard regression models with shared frailties to a dataset that comprised records of reproductive events and their succeeding survival trajectories of 25,762 mother-child dyads that lived in the sentinel areas of the Ifakara and Rufiji Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems from 2000 to 2015. The analysis was motivated by two hypotheses: First, that relatively short subsequent and preceding birth intervals would be associated with heightened risks of child mortality; however, that the effects of short subsequent birth intervals would be most pronounced among children between 12 and 59 months of age; and second, that the effects of short preceding birth intervals would be most acute during the neonatal and post-neonatal period. Results, which were adjusted for confounder effects at the individual, household, and contextual levels, demonstrated significant associations between subsequent and preceding birth interval durations and childhood mortality risk. Regarding subsequent birth intervals, relative to birth spacing of less than 18 months, durations 24-35 and ≥36 months were associated with 1-5-year-old mortality risks that were 0.29 and 0.21 times lower. Relative to preceding birth intervals of less than 18 months, those of 24-35 months were associated with a neonatal mortality risk that was 0.48 lower. Compared to the same referent group, preceding birth intervals of 18-23, 24-35, and ≥36 months were significantly associated with 12-23-month-old mortality risks that were 0.20, 0.39, and 0.33 times lower. The findings are compared with those from similar studies held in SSA, and the potential for family planning programmes to contribute to improved child survival in settings, such as Tanzania, is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosocial Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosocial Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932025100412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family planning programmes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) often disseminate the proposition that birth spacing improves child survival. Yet, there are few examinations of this hypothesis that benefit from longitudinal data. This paper addresses this gap using 15 years of prospective data from three rural districts of Tanzania. The effect of birth interval durations on the risk of childhood mortality was estimated by fitting Weibull parametric hazard regression models with shared frailties to a dataset that comprised records of reproductive events and their succeeding survival trajectories of 25,762 mother-child dyads that lived in the sentinel areas of the Ifakara and Rufiji Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems from 2000 to 2015. The analysis was motivated by two hypotheses: First, that relatively short subsequent and preceding birth intervals would be associated with heightened risks of child mortality; however, that the effects of short subsequent birth intervals would be most pronounced among children between 12 and 59 months of age; and second, that the effects of short preceding birth intervals would be most acute during the neonatal and post-neonatal period. Results, which were adjusted for confounder effects at the individual, household, and contextual levels, demonstrated significant associations between subsequent and preceding birth interval durations and childhood mortality risk. Regarding subsequent birth intervals, relative to birth spacing of less than 18 months, durations 24-35 and ≥36 months were associated with 1-5-year-old mortality risks that were 0.29 and 0.21 times lower. Relative to preceding birth intervals of less than 18 months, those of 24-35 months were associated with a neonatal mortality risk that was 0.48 lower. Compared to the same referent group, preceding birth intervals of 18-23, 24-35, and ≥36 months were significantly associated with 12-23-month-old mortality risks that were 0.20, 0.39, and 0.33 times lower. The findings are compared with those from similar studies held in SSA, and the potential for family planning programmes to contribute to improved child survival in settings, such as Tanzania, is discussed.

坦桑尼亚农村地区的出生间隔和儿童死亡率。
撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的计划生育方案经常传播生育间隔可以改善儿童存活率的主张。然而,很少有对这一假设的检验受益于纵向数据。本文利用坦桑尼亚三个农村地区15年的前瞻性数据解决了这一差距。通过将具有共同脆弱性的Weibull参数风险回归模型拟合到一个数据集,估计了出生间隔时间对儿童死亡风险的影响,该数据集包括2000年至2015年居住在Ifakara和Rufiji健康和人口监测系统哨点地区的25,762对母子的生殖事件及其后续生存轨迹的记录。该分析基于两个假设:第一,相对较短的产后和产前间隔与儿童死亡率增加的风险有关;然而,较短的生育间隔对12至59个月大的孩子的影响最为明显;第二,短的出生前间隔的影响在新生儿和新生儿后期是最严重的。在个人、家庭和背景水平上对混杂因素进行调整后的结果显示,前后出生间隔时间与儿童死亡风险之间存在显著关联。关于随后的生育间隔,相对于小于18个月的生育间隔,24-35个月和≥36个月与1-5岁死亡风险相关,分别降低0.29和0.21倍。相对于分娩前不到18个月的间隔,24-35个月的间隔与新生儿死亡风险降低0.48相关。与同一参照组相比,产前间隔18-23、24-35和≥36个月与12-23月龄死亡风险显著相关,分别降低0.20、0.39和0.33倍。将调查结果与在非洲南部地区进行的类似研究的结果进行了比较,并讨论了计划生育方案有助于改善坦桑尼亚等环境下儿童生存的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Journal of Biosocial Science is a leading interdisciplinary and international journal in the field of biosocial science, the common ground between biology and sociology. It acts as an essential reference guide for all biological and social scientists working in these interdisciplinary areas, including social and biological aspects of reproduction and its control, gerontology, ecology, genetics, applied psychology, sociology, education, criminology, demography, health and epidemiology. Publishing original research papers, short reports, reviews, lectures and book reviews, the journal also includes a Debate section that encourages readers" comments on specific articles, with subsequent response from the original author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信