Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research.

IF 1.9 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Elizabeth C Hoelscher, Sarah E Victor, Glenn Kiekens, Brooke Ammerman
{"title":"Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research.","authors":"Elizabeth C Hoelscher, Sarah E Victor, Glenn Kiekens, Brooke Ammerman","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2456714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research examining non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in daily life has grown substantially; thus, it is essential in conducting ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research with individuals who self-injure to follow important ethical guidelines. Given the challenges faced by researchers in monitoring, assessing, and responding to risk among those who self-injure, further guidance and research is warranted in informing best-practices for conducting EMA research examining NSSI. We suggest ethics-based approaches to professional competence, responding to and monitoring risk, and ensuring inclusive and representative approaches to NSSI research in daily life. Related empirical and practical issues in need of further investigation are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47265,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2025.2456714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research examining non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in daily life has grown substantially; thus, it is essential in conducting ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research with individuals who self-injure to follow important ethical guidelines. Given the challenges faced by researchers in monitoring, assessing, and responding to risk among those who self-injure, further guidance and research is warranted in informing best-practices for conducting EMA research examining NSSI. We suggest ethics-based approaches to professional competence, responding to and monitoring risk, and ensuring inclusive and representative approaches to NSSI research in daily life. Related empirical and practical issues in need of further investigation are discussed.

在非自杀性自伤研究中使用生态瞬时评估的伦理考虑。
对日常生活中非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的研究已经大大增加;因此,在对自残者进行生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究时,遵循重要的伦理准则是至关重要的。鉴于研究人员在监测、评估和应对自伤者风险方面面临的挑战,有必要进一步指导和研究,为开展检查自伤的EMA研究提供最佳实践。我们建议以伦理为基础的方法来提高专业能力,应对和监测风险,并确保日常生活中自伤研究的包容性和代表性。讨论了需要进一步研究的相关实证问题和实际问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & Behavior
Ethics & Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信