Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Burak Tasci, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.","authors":"Burak Tasci, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.109463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining widespread traction in surgical disciplines, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, where it offers opportunities to enhance decision-making, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes across the entire surgical continuum.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To comprehensively evaluate current AI applications in GI surgery, highlighting its role in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, postoperative monitoring, endoscopic diagnosis, and surgical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched the Web of Science Core Collection through March 31, 2025 using the terms \"artificial intelligence\" AND \"gastrointestinal surgery\". Inclusion criteria: Original, English-language, full-text articles indexed under the \"Surgery\" category reporting quantitative AI performance metrics in GI surgery. Exclusion criteria: Reviews, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, non-English publications, ESCI/SSCI/Index Chemicus-only papers, studies without full text, and articles outside the surgical domain. Full texts of potentially eligible studies were assessed, yielding 45 studies from an initial 955 records for qualitative and quantitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies demonstrated that AI has superior performance compared to traditional clinical tools in areas such as risk prediction, lesion detection, nerve identification, and complication forecasting. Notably, convolutional neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, and reinforcement learning models were commonly used. AI-enhanced systems improved diagnostic accuracy, procedural safety, documentation quality, and educational feedback. However, there are several limitations, such as lack of external validation, dataset standardization, and explainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI is transforming GI surgery from preoperative risk assessment to postoperative care and training. While many tools now match or exceed expert-level performance, successful clinical adoption requires transparent, validated models that seamlessly integrate into surgical workflows. With continued multidisciplinary collaboration, AI is positioned to become a trusted companion in surgical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 8","pages":"109463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.109463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining widespread traction in surgical disciplines, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, where it offers opportunities to enhance decision-making, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes across the entire surgical continuum.

Aim: To comprehensively evaluate current AI applications in GI surgery, highlighting its role in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, postoperative monitoring, endoscopic diagnosis, and surgical education.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched the Web of Science Core Collection through March 31, 2025 using the terms "artificial intelligence" AND "gastrointestinal surgery". Inclusion criteria: Original, English-language, full-text articles indexed under the "Surgery" category reporting quantitative AI performance metrics in GI surgery. Exclusion criteria: Reviews, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, non-English publications, ESCI/SSCI/Index Chemicus-only papers, studies without full text, and articles outside the surgical domain. Full texts of potentially eligible studies were assessed, yielding 45 studies from an initial 955 records for qualitative and quantitative synthesis.

Results: The included studies demonstrated that AI has superior performance compared to traditional clinical tools in areas such as risk prediction, lesion detection, nerve identification, and complication forecasting. Notably, convolutional neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, and reinforcement learning models were commonly used. AI-enhanced systems improved diagnostic accuracy, procedural safety, documentation quality, and educational feedback. However, there are several limitations, such as lack of external validation, dataset standardization, and explainability.

Conclusion: AI is transforming GI surgery from preoperative risk assessment to postoperative care and training. While many tools now match or exceed expert-level performance, successful clinical adoption requires transparent, validated models that seamlessly integrate into surgical workflows. With continued multidisciplinary collaboration, AI is positioned to become a trusted companion in surgical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能在胃肠手术中的应用:系统综述。
背景:人工智能(AI)在外科学科中获得了广泛的关注,特别是在胃肠道(GI)手术中,它为在整个手术连续体中增强决策、提高准确性和优化患者预后提供了机会。目的:综合评价人工智能在胃肠外科手术中的应用现状,突出人工智能在术前规划、术中指导、术后监测、内镜诊断、手术教育等方面的作用。方法:本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。我们用“人工智能”和“胃肠手术”这两个词搜索了截至2025年3月31日的Web of Science核心合集。纳入标准:在“外科”类别下索引的原创,英语,全文文章,报告胃肠道手术中定量人工智能性能指标。排除标准:综述、社论、信函、会议摘要、非英文出版物、ESCI/SSCI/Index仅限化学文献的论文、没有全文的研究以及外科领域以外的文章。对可能符合条件的研究的全文进行了评估,从最初的955项记录中选出45项研究进行定性和定量综合。结果:纳入的研究表明,与传统临床工具相比,人工智能在风险预测、病变检测、神经识别和并发症预测等方面具有优越的性能。值得注意的是,卷积神经网络、随机森林、支持向量机和强化学习模型是常用的。人工智能增强系统提高了诊断准确性、程序安全性、文档质量和教育反馈。然而,存在一些限制,例如缺乏外部验证、数据集标准化和可解释性。结论:人工智能正在将胃肠道手术从术前风险评估转变为术后护理和培训。虽然现在许多工具的性能达到或超过专家水平,但成功的临床应用需要透明、经过验证的模型无缝集成到手术工作流程中。随着多学科的持续合作,人工智能将成为外科实践中值得信赖的伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信