Comparison of dusting and fragmentation techniques using an aspiration access sheath: an in vitro study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Engin Denizhan Demirkıran, Reha Girgin, Umut Can Karaarslan, Murat Can Kiremit, Tarık Emre Şener
{"title":"Comparison of dusting and fragmentation techniques using an aspiration access sheath: an in vitro study.","authors":"Engin Denizhan Demirkıran, Reha Girgin, Umut Can Karaarslan, Murat Can Kiremit, Tarık Emre Şener","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05935-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Suction during flexible ureteroscopy improves stone clearance and lowers complications. The aim of this study is to provide one of the first in vitro comparisons of dusting and fragmentation techniques during laser lithotripsy using an aspiration access sheath.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The bench model consisted of a modified 50-cc syringe that served as a calyx model, into which an 11-13 Fr suction access sheath and artificial BegoStone stones were placed. Three trials were performed by 3 surgeons using Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) for lithotripsy, using both dusting and fragmentation settings and techniques. The primary outcomes were evaluation of energy usage, particle size distribution, procedural efficiency and scope entry-exit count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fragmentation showed shorter lasing times (31.15 vs 45.15 min, p < 0.001) and greater ablation efficacy (29.64 vs 24.55 mm<sup>3</sup>/J, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, it necessitated longer suction durations (14.11 vs 5.77 min, p = 0.001) due to larger particle sizes and the need for more frequent scope entries (16 vs 4, p < 0.001). Dusting consumed more energy (40.73 vs 33.73 kJ, p < 0.001) but produced finer fragments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fragmentation using an aspiration sheath shortens the lasing time and improves ablation efficacy, but it also increases the frequency of scope entries and may result in endoscope damage. Dusting produces a finer particle dispersion despite using more energy. The choice of technique should be tailored to the demands of the patient and the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05935-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Suction during flexible ureteroscopy improves stone clearance and lowers complications. The aim of this study is to provide one of the first in vitro comparisons of dusting and fragmentation techniques during laser lithotripsy using an aspiration access sheath.

Methods: The bench model consisted of a modified 50-cc syringe that served as a calyx model, into which an 11-13 Fr suction access sheath and artificial BegoStone stones were placed. Three trials were performed by 3 surgeons using Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) for lithotripsy, using both dusting and fragmentation settings and techniques. The primary outcomes were evaluation of energy usage, particle size distribution, procedural efficiency and scope entry-exit count.

Results: Fragmentation showed shorter lasing times (31.15 vs 45.15 min, p < 0.001) and greater ablation efficacy (29.64 vs 24.55 mm3/J, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, it necessitated longer suction durations (14.11 vs 5.77 min, p = 0.001) due to larger particle sizes and the need for more frequent scope entries (16 vs 4, p < 0.001). Dusting consumed more energy (40.73 vs 33.73 kJ, p < 0.001) but produced finer fragments.

Conclusion: Fragmentation using an aspiration sheath shortens the lasing time and improves ablation efficacy, but it also increases the frequency of scope entries and may result in endoscope damage. Dusting produces a finer particle dispersion despite using more energy. The choice of technique should be tailored to the demands of the patient and the surgeon.

使用吸入通路套的粉尘和碎片技术的比较:一项体外研究。
目的:输尿管软镜术中吸力可改善结石清除,减少并发症。本研究的目的是提供第一个在体外比较粉尘和碎片技术在激光碎石术中使用吸入通路鞘。方法:采用改良的50cc注射器作为花萼模型,在其内置入11-13 Fr吸入口护套和人造BegoStone结石。3位外科医生使用铥光纤激光(TFL)进行了3次试验,使用了粉尘和碎片设置和技术。主要结果是对能源使用、粒度分布、程序效率和范围进出计数的评估。结果:碎片化可缩短激光时间(31.15 min vs 45.15 min, p 3/J, p)。结论:使用抽吸鞘碎片化可缩短激光时间,提高消融效果,但也增加了进入内镜的频率,可能导致内窥镜损伤。除尘产生更细的颗粒分散,尽管使用更多的能量。技术的选择应根据病人和外科医生的需要而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信