Adjuvant chemotherapy for gallbladder cancer: Current evidence, controversies, and future directions.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jin-Wei Dai, Yi-Xuan Xing, Nian-Zhe Sun
{"title":"Adjuvant chemotherapy for gallbladder cancer: Current evidence, controversies, and future directions.","authors":"Jin-Wei Dai, Yi-Xuan Xing, Nian-Zhe Sun","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.108160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gallbladder cancer is an aggressive malignancy notorious for its poor prognosis and treatment challenges, even at early stages. In their recent work, Kim <i>et al</i> utilized data from the National Cancer Database to explore whether adding chemotherapy to surgical intervention could improve survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with stage II gallbladder cancer. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy following curative surgery in this patient population has been a long-standing source of debate. Historically, the lack of clear guidelines for managing stage II gallbladder cancer has resulted in inconsistent, sometimes contradictory findings from various studies regarding the effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy. Consequently, many clinicians have relied on studies involving other biliary tract cancers to justify the routine use of prophylactic chemotherapy after surgery, aiming to minimize recurrence risk. Given the rarity, high mortality rate, and the small sample sizes typical in gallbladder cancer studies, Kim <i>et al</i>'s contribution represents a significant and commendable effort to address these challenges. Kim <i>et al</i> designed a retrospective cohort study with well-defined inclusion criteria and clear treatment classifications. Notably, their findings suggested that in stage II gallbladder cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy did not yield a meaningful survival benefit over surgery alone. These results therefore casted doubt on the routine practice of administering chemotherapy to all patients postoperatively, prompted clinicians to reconsider their approach. Furthermore, this controversy directly influences clinical decisionmaking and guideline recommendations, as uncertainty regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may lead to heterogeneous practices across different institutions and regions. This article critically assessed the research design, methodology, and clinical implications of the study by Kim <i>et al</i>. It also provided an in-depth exploration of the broader question regarding the appropriateness of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery for stage II gallbladder cancer, highlighting the necessity of rigorous study designs to produce reliable evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 8","pages":"108160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.108160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer is an aggressive malignancy notorious for its poor prognosis and treatment challenges, even at early stages. In their recent work, Kim et al utilized data from the National Cancer Database to explore whether adding chemotherapy to surgical intervention could improve survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with stage II gallbladder cancer. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy following curative surgery in this patient population has been a long-standing source of debate. Historically, the lack of clear guidelines for managing stage II gallbladder cancer has resulted in inconsistent, sometimes contradictory findings from various studies regarding the effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy. Consequently, many clinicians have relied on studies involving other biliary tract cancers to justify the routine use of prophylactic chemotherapy after surgery, aiming to minimize recurrence risk. Given the rarity, high mortality rate, and the small sample sizes typical in gallbladder cancer studies, Kim et al's contribution represents a significant and commendable effort to address these challenges. Kim et al designed a retrospective cohort study with well-defined inclusion criteria and clear treatment classifications. Notably, their findings suggested that in stage II gallbladder cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy did not yield a meaningful survival benefit over surgery alone. These results therefore casted doubt on the routine practice of administering chemotherapy to all patients postoperatively, prompted clinicians to reconsider their approach. Furthermore, this controversy directly influences clinical decisionmaking and guideline recommendations, as uncertainty regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may lead to heterogeneous practices across different institutions and regions. This article critically assessed the research design, methodology, and clinical implications of the study by Kim et al. It also provided an in-depth exploration of the broader question regarding the appropriateness of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery for stage II gallbladder cancer, highlighting the necessity of rigorous study designs to produce reliable evidence.

胆囊癌的辅助化疗:目前的证据,争议和未来的方向。
胆囊癌是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,其预后差,治疗困难,即使在早期阶段。在他们最近的工作中,Kim等人利用国家癌症数据库的数据来探讨在手术干预中加入化疗是否可以改善II期胆囊癌患者的生存结果。治疗性手术后辅助化疗的使用在这类患者群体中一直是一个长期争论的来源。从历史上看,由于缺乏明确的II期胆囊癌治疗指南,导致各种关于术后化疗有效性的研究结果不一致,有时甚至相互矛盾。因此,许多临床医生依靠涉及其他胆道癌症的研究来证明术后常规使用预防性化疗的合理性,旨在将复发风险降至最低。考虑到胆囊癌研究的罕见性、高死亡率和典型的小样本量,Kim等人的贡献代表了解决这些挑战的重要和值得赞扬的努力。Kim等人设计了一项回顾性队列研究,具有明确的纳入标准和明确的治疗分类。值得注意的是,他们的研究结果表明,在II期胆囊癌中,辅助化疗并没有比单独手术产生有意义的生存益处。因此,这些结果对所有患者术后给予化疗的常规做法提出了质疑,促使临床医生重新考虑他们的方法。此外,这种争议直接影响临床决策和指南建议,因为关于辅助化疗益处的不确定性可能导致不同机构和地区的异质实践。本文批判性地评估了Kim等人的研究设计、方法和临床意义。该研究还对II期胆囊癌术后辅助化疗的适宜性这一更广泛的问题进行了深入探讨,强调了严格的研究设计以产生可靠证据的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信