Complex uniportal robotic-assisted sleeve resections under spontaneous ventilation and with double lumen intubation: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-08-31 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-498
Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Pablo Gomes-da Silva de Rosenzweig, Luis Fernando Arana Bolaños, Adriana Simoneta Pimienta Ibarra, Hasanali David Walji, Patricio Santillan Dohetty, Jun Zhao, Chang Li, Mugurel Bosinceanu, Francina Valezka Bolaños Morales
{"title":"Complex uniportal robotic-assisted sleeve resections under spontaneous ventilation and with double lumen intubation: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.","authors":"Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Pablo Gomes-da Silva de Rosenzweig, Luis Fernando Arana Bolaños, Adriana Simoneta Pimienta Ibarra, Hasanali David Walji, Patricio Santillan Dohetty, Jun Zhao, Chang Li, Mugurel Bosinceanu, Francina Valezka Bolaños Morales","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-2025-498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Sleeve lobectomy (SL) has evolved into the preferred surgical option for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other complex thoracic tumors, offering superior functional and oncological outcomes compared to pneumonectomy. The recent advent of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), including its uniportal approach (uRATS), has extended the feasibility of SL to minimally invasive approaches. The objective of this study is to present our experience with uRATS sleeve resections, highlighting five complex cases, involving four sleeve lobectomies and one tracheal resection, performed using two different robotic platforms (da Vinci and ShuRui). Additionally, we aim to provide an up-to-date review of SL as a treatment strategy for NSCLC and centrally located tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a narrative review covering publications from 2010 to 2025. The search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Although data on RATS SL remains limited, several publications have highlighted the potential benefits of this approach. Comparative studies evaluating different operative approaches for SL have shown that RATS offers advantages over both open and video-assisted thoracic surgery. uRATS SL represents a novel and evolving technique that combines technical precision with favorable perioperative outcomes. However, its adoption is often slow due to the inherent complexity and steep learning curve associated with the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>uRATS SL carinal and tracheal reconstructions have emerged as promising treatment strategies for centrally located tumors. However, there remains an urgent need for further comparative studies assessing both short- and long-term outcomes, as well as evaluating oncologic outcomes and their impact on patients' quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 8","pages":"3170-3182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-2025-498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Sleeve lobectomy (SL) has evolved into the preferred surgical option for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other complex thoracic tumors, offering superior functional and oncological outcomes compared to pneumonectomy. The recent advent of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), including its uniportal approach (uRATS), has extended the feasibility of SL to minimally invasive approaches. The objective of this study is to present our experience with uRATS sleeve resections, highlighting five complex cases, involving four sleeve lobectomies and one tracheal resection, performed using two different robotic platforms (da Vinci and ShuRui). Additionally, we aim to provide an up-to-date review of SL as a treatment strategy for NSCLC and centrally located tumors.

Methods: We performed a narrative review covering publications from 2010 to 2025. The search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases.

Key content and findings: Although data on RATS SL remains limited, several publications have highlighted the potential benefits of this approach. Comparative studies evaluating different operative approaches for SL have shown that RATS offers advantages over both open and video-assisted thoracic surgery. uRATS SL represents a novel and evolving technique that combines technical precision with favorable perioperative outcomes. However, its adoption is often slow due to the inherent complexity and steep learning curve associated with the procedure.

Conclusions: uRATS SL carinal and tracheal reconstructions have emerged as promising treatment strategies for centrally located tumors. However, there remains an urgent need for further comparative studies assessing both short- and long-term outcomes, as well as evaluating oncologic outcomes and their impact on patients' quality of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复杂的单门机器人辅助袖切除下自发通气和双腔插管:一个案例系列和文献的叙述回顾。
背景和目的:与全肺切除术相比,袖状肺叶切除术(SL)已发展成为中心位置非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和其他复杂胸部肿瘤的首选手术选择,具有更好的功能和肿瘤预后。最近出现的机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS),包括其单门静脉入路(uRATS),将SL的可行性扩展到微创入路。本研究的目的是介绍我们在uRATS套筒切除术中的经验,重点介绍5例复杂病例,包括4例套筒肺叶切除术和1例气管切除术,使用两种不同的机器人平台(da Vinci和ShuRui)进行。此外,我们的目标是提供SL作为非小细胞肺癌和中心位置肿瘤治疗策略的最新综述。方法:我们对2010年至2025年的出版物进行了叙述性回顾。检索在PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus数据库中进行。主要内容和发现:尽管关于RATS SL的数据仍然有限,但一些出版物强调了这种方法的潜在好处。评估SL不同手术入路的比较研究表明,RATS比开放和视频辅助胸外科手术都有优势。uRATS SL代表了一种新颖的、不断发展的技术,将技术精度与良好的围手术期结果相结合。然而,由于固有的复杂性和与该过程相关的陡峭的学习曲线,它的采用通常很慢。结论:uRATS SL隆突和气管重建已成为中心位置肿瘤的有希望的治疗策略。然而,仍然迫切需要进一步的比较研究来评估短期和长期结果,以及评估肿瘤结果及其对患者生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信