{"title":"Improving patient satisfaction and anatomical fit: a retrospective study on the purse-string suture-assisted disposable circumcision suture device.","authors":"Yan Long, Tian-Chi Wang, Ke-Jian Wang, Yong Zhu","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) faces significant limitations in anatomical adaptability. We developed a novel technique integrating the adjustable purse-string suture (APSS) from proctology to address this unmet need. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of APSS-DCSD for circumcision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analyzed 93 consecutive patients undergoing circumcision (December 2023-January 2025). Non-randomized allocation stratified patients into: the APSS-DCSD cohort (n=45) and conventional DCSD cohort (n=48). Outcomes measure included operative time, blood loss, complications (frenular injury, infection), intraoperative pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), patient satisfaction, and healing time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant intergroup differences were observed in blood loss (median: 3.2 <i>vs.</i> 3.1 mL; P=0.66), healing time (median: 24 <i>vs.</i> 23 days; P=0.85), or VAS scores (median: 3.0 <i>vs.</i> 4.0; P=0.10). The APSS-DCSD cohort revealed longer operative times [7.0 <i>vs.</i> 6.5 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.708-8.809; P<0.001] and significantly higher satisfaction (median score: 5 <i>vs.</i> 4; 95% CI: 3.414-20.995; P<0.001). Incision infections occurred in three cases overall (APSS-DCSD: 2.2% <i>vs.</i> DCSD: 4.2%; P>0.99). No severe complications (hematoma, frenular injury) were documented in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The APSS-DCSD approach significantly improves anatomical precision and patient satisfaction without compromising safety margins. Its standardized protocol demonstrates particular utility in complex anatomies, warranting prospective multicenter validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 8","pages":"2245-2253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) faces significant limitations in anatomical adaptability. We developed a novel technique integrating the adjustable purse-string suture (APSS) from proctology to address this unmet need. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of APSS-DCSD for circumcision.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 93 consecutive patients undergoing circumcision (December 2023-January 2025). Non-randomized allocation stratified patients into: the APSS-DCSD cohort (n=45) and conventional DCSD cohort (n=48). Outcomes measure included operative time, blood loss, complications (frenular injury, infection), intraoperative pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), patient satisfaction, and healing time.
Results: No significant intergroup differences were observed in blood loss (median: 3.2 vs. 3.1 mL; P=0.66), healing time (median: 24 vs. 23 days; P=0.85), or VAS scores (median: 3.0 vs. 4.0; P=0.10). The APSS-DCSD cohort revealed longer operative times [7.0 vs. 6.5 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.708-8.809; P<0.001] and significantly higher satisfaction (median score: 5 vs. 4; 95% CI: 3.414-20.995; P<0.001). Incision infections occurred in three cases overall (APSS-DCSD: 2.2% vs. DCSD: 4.2%; P>0.99). No severe complications (hematoma, frenular injury) were documented in either cohort.
Conclusions: The APSS-DCSD approach significantly improves anatomical precision and patient satisfaction without compromising safety margins. Its standardized protocol demonstrates particular utility in complex anatomies, warranting prospective multicenter validation.
背景:一次性包皮环切缝合器(DCSD)在解剖适应性方面存在明显的局限性。我们开发了一种新颖的技术,整合了直肠科的可调节钱包线缝合(APSS),以解决这一未满足的需求。本研究旨在评价APSS-DCSD用于包皮环切术的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性队列研究分析了93例连续接受包皮环切术的患者(2023年12月至2025年1月)。非随机分配分层患者分为:APSS-DCSD组(n=45)和常规DCSD组(n=48)。结果测量包括手术时间、出血量、并发症(系带损伤、感染)、术中疼痛(视觉模拟量表,VAS)、患者满意度和愈合时间。结果:出血量(中位数:3.2 vs. 3.1 mL; P=0.66)、愈合时间(中位数:24 vs. 23天;P=0.85)或VAS评分(中位数:3.0 vs. 4.0; P=0.10)组间无显著差异。APSS-DCSD组显示手术时间更长[7.0 vs. 6.5 min;95%置信区间(CI): 1.708-8.809;pv。4;95% ci: 3.414-20.995;pv。DCSD: 4.2%;P > 0.99)。两组均无严重并发症(血肿、系带损伤)。结论:APSS-DCSD入路在不影响安全边际的情况下显著提高了解剖精度和患者满意度。其标准化方案证明了在复杂解剖结构中的特殊效用,保证了前瞻性的多中心验证。
期刊介绍:
ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.