Impact of Animal Encounter Modality and Species on Zoo Visitor Knowledge, Concern, and Conservation Intent.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Zoo Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1002/zoo.70023
Lisa P Barrett, Rebecca J Snyder
{"title":"Impact of Animal Encounter Modality and Species on Zoo Visitor Knowledge, Concern, and Conservation Intent.","authors":"Lisa P Barrett, Rebecca J Snyder","doi":"10.1002/zoo.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zoos fill an important role in connecting humans with nature, especially given an increasing rate of both urbanization and biodiversity loss. With the advent of new technologies, however, there are many alternatives to experiencing biodiversity firsthand. We tested if the type of animal encounter at a zoo (in-person animal viewing without touch, in-person animal viewing with touch, or video-recorded animal viewing) and/or animal species (elephant or stingray) affected zoo visitor knowledge, emotional affect, empathic concern, and/or conservation intent. A total of 300 zoo members were randomly assigned to 6 different animal encounter conditions. We found that participants who viewed video-recordings of animals had significantly lower scores on all outcomes, except knowledge, than those who viewed animals in-person. There were no significant differences between in-person animal viewing without touch and in-person animal viewing with touch. Moreover, we found that stingray participants had lower scores on all outcomes compared to elephant participants. We suggest extensions of this study and discuss potential implications for the future role of zoos.</p>","PeriodicalId":24035,"journal":{"name":"Zoo Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoo Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zoos fill an important role in connecting humans with nature, especially given an increasing rate of both urbanization and biodiversity loss. With the advent of new technologies, however, there are many alternatives to experiencing biodiversity firsthand. We tested if the type of animal encounter at a zoo (in-person animal viewing without touch, in-person animal viewing with touch, or video-recorded animal viewing) and/or animal species (elephant or stingray) affected zoo visitor knowledge, emotional affect, empathic concern, and/or conservation intent. A total of 300 zoo members were randomly assigned to 6 different animal encounter conditions. We found that participants who viewed video-recordings of animals had significantly lower scores on all outcomes, except knowledge, than those who viewed animals in-person. There were no significant differences between in-person animal viewing without touch and in-person animal viewing with touch. Moreover, we found that stingray participants had lower scores on all outcomes compared to elephant participants. We suggest extensions of this study and discuss potential implications for the future role of zoos.

动物接触方式和物种对动物园游客知识、关注和保护意图的影响。
动物园在连接人类与自然方面发挥着重要作用,尤其是在城市化和生物多样性丧失速度日益加快的情况下。然而,随着新技术的出现,除了亲身体验生物多样性之外,还有许多其他选择。我们测试了在动物园中遇到动物的类型(无触摸的亲自观看动物,有触摸的亲自观看动物,或有视频记录的动物观看)和/或动物物种(大象或黄貂鱼)是否会影响动物园游客的知识,情感影响,移情关注和/或保护意图。共有300名动物园成员被随机分配到6种不同的动物遭遇条件下。我们发现,观看动物录像的参与者在所有结果上的得分都明显低于那些亲自观看动物的人,除了知识。没有触摸的亲临动物观看和有触摸的亲临动物观看之间没有显著差异。此外,我们发现与大象参与者相比,黄貂鱼参与者在所有结果上的得分都较低。我们建议扩展这项研究,并讨论对动物园未来角色的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoo Biology
Zoo Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoo Biology is concerned with reproduction, demographics, genetics, behavior, medicine, husbandry, nutrition, conservation and all empirical aspects of the exhibition and maintenance of wild animals in wildlife parks, zoos, and aquariums. This diverse journal offers a forum for effectively communicating scientific findings, original ideas, and critical thinking related to the role of wildlife collections and their unique contribution to conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信