Empathy types in medical and pedagogical professions.

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/195314
Christoph M Paulus, Saskia Meinken
{"title":"Empathy types in medical and pedagogical professions.","authors":"Christoph M Paulus, Saskia Meinken","doi":"10.5114/cipp/195314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to find out whether certain types of empathy are over- or underrepresented in medical and educational professions. We used the following four types of empathy profiles: \"Situation-dependent altruists\" (A) have high affective and cognitive empathy aspects with high personal distress. \"High-functioning empaths\" (B) differ from pattern A by the low distress. People who have neither clear affective nor cognitive empathy traits, but are characterized by high distress, are \"low neurotic empaths\" (C). Types whose mean scores on all three aspects were below the mean are referred to as \"low empaths\" (D).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The sample consisted of 439 subjects. The group of medical professionals included doctors, nursing staff, and other medical staff. The group of educators included teachers, social pedagogues, educators, social workers and special needs teachers. We used the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to measure empathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two occupational groups differed from each other non-significantly in their respective distribution. In the nursing staff sample, profile B is clearly overrepresented and profile C is clearly underrepresented. Nursing staff therefore have a high level of emotional concern and perspective taking together with lower distress. Nurses and pedagogical staff occur in our sample most frequently in the empathic pattern A and B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The typologization of empathy skills proved to be a good method of describing affective and cognitive aspects of empathy within a personality. In addition, the results emphasize the importance of empathy training, which is well established in medical education but virtually non-existent in pedagogical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":"13 3","pages":"149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/195314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to find out whether certain types of empathy are over- or underrepresented in medical and educational professions. We used the following four types of empathy profiles: "Situation-dependent altruists" (A) have high affective and cognitive empathy aspects with high personal distress. "High-functioning empaths" (B) differ from pattern A by the low distress. People who have neither clear affective nor cognitive empathy traits, but are characterized by high distress, are "low neurotic empaths" (C). Types whose mean scores on all three aspects were below the mean are referred to as "low empaths" (D).

Participants and procedure: The sample consisted of 439 subjects. The group of medical professionals included doctors, nursing staff, and other medical staff. The group of educators included teachers, social pedagogues, educators, social workers and special needs teachers. We used the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to measure empathy.

Results: The two occupational groups differed from each other non-significantly in their respective distribution. In the nursing staff sample, profile B is clearly overrepresented and profile C is clearly underrepresented. Nursing staff therefore have a high level of emotional concern and perspective taking together with lower distress. Nurses and pedagogical staff occur in our sample most frequently in the empathic pattern A and B.

Conclusions: The typologization of empathy skills proved to be a good method of describing affective and cognitive aspects of empathy within a personality. In addition, the results emphasize the importance of empathy training, which is well established in medical education but virtually non-existent in pedagogical education.

医学和教学专业中的移情类型。
背景:这项研究的目的是找出某些类型的同理心在医疗和教育行业中是否被过度代表或被低估。情境依赖型利他者(A)具有较高的情感共情和认知共情,且具有较高的个人痛苦。“高功能共情者”(B)与模式A的不同之处在于其痛苦程度较低。既没有明确的情感同理心特征,也没有明确的认知同理心特征,但以高度痛苦为特征的人是“低神经性同理心”(C)。在这三个方面的平均得分都低于平均值的类型被称为“低同理心”(D)。参与者和程序:样本包括439名受试者。这组医疗专业人员包括医生、护理人员和其他医务人员。这组教育工作者包括教师、社会教育工作者、教育工作者、社会工作者和特殊需要教师。我们使用德国版的人际反应指数(IRI)来测量共情。结果:两职业组在各自分布上差异不显著。在护理人员样本中,B型明显被过度代表,而C型明显被低估。因此,护理人员具有高水平的情感关注和视角,同时具有较低的痛苦。在我们的样本中,护士和教学人员最常出现在共情模式A和b中。结论:共情技能的类型化被证明是描述人格中共情的情感和认知方面的好方法。此外,研究结果强调了移情训练的重要性,移情训练在医学教育中已经建立,但在教学教育中几乎不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信