Trends and Outcomes of Secondary Intraocular Lens Utilization Among Vitreoretinal Surgeons Compared to Vitreoretinal and Anterior Segment Surgeons.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Maria A Bantounou, Nitika Aggarwal, Nicholas Boucher, Chakshu Sharma, Matthew R Starr
{"title":"Trends and Outcomes of Secondary Intraocular Lens Utilization Among Vitreoretinal Surgeons Compared to Vitreoretinal and Anterior Segment Surgeons.","authors":"Maria A Bantounou, Nitika Aggarwal, Nicholas Boucher, Chakshu Sharma, Matthew R Starr","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20250725-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL), scleral-sutured IOL (SSIOL), anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) are used to manage aphakia or lens subluxation. This study compared trends in surgical techniques and outcomes of secondary IOL implantation based on surgeon type.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients from United States (US) retinal centers who underwent surgery by vitreoretinal (VR cohort) or VR and anterior segment (AS) (combined cohort) surgeons from 2015 to 2024. Complications assessed included retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, suture erosion, haptic erosion, repeat pas plana vitrectomy, and corneal edema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VR surgeons performed 4,143 secondary IOL surgeries (1,977 ACIOL, 1,327 SFIOL, 839 SSIOL) while VR and AS surgeons performed 511 (342 ACIOL, 125 SFIOL, 44 SSIOL). SFIOL and SSIOL surgeries by VR surgeons increased, whereas ACIOL surgeries decreased. VR and AS surgeons maintained a steady but lower volume of SFIOL and SSIOL cases, with increasing ACIOL surgeries. Postoperative visual acuity for the VR and combination cohorts was 54.3 ± 27.8 and 51.5 ± 27.2 (≈ 20/100 Snellen) (<i>P</i> value = 0.102), respectively. Complication rates were similar between cohorts, except for postoperative retinal detachment (VR: 144, 3.5%; combined: 26, 5.1%; <i>P</i> value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACIOLs were the most commonly performed secondary IOL surgery. However, a shift toward SFIOL and SSIOL techniques among vitreo-retinal surgeons emerged. Outcomes were comparable between approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20250725-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL), scleral-sutured IOL (SSIOL), anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) are used to manage aphakia or lens subluxation. This study compared trends in surgical techniques and outcomes of secondary IOL implantation based on surgeon type.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included patients from United States (US) retinal centers who underwent surgery by vitreoretinal (VR cohort) or VR and anterior segment (AS) (combined cohort) surgeons from 2015 to 2024. Complications assessed included retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, suture erosion, haptic erosion, repeat pas plana vitrectomy, and corneal edema.

Results: VR surgeons performed 4,143 secondary IOL surgeries (1,977 ACIOL, 1,327 SFIOL, 839 SSIOL) while VR and AS surgeons performed 511 (342 ACIOL, 125 SFIOL, 44 SSIOL). SFIOL and SSIOL surgeries by VR surgeons increased, whereas ACIOL surgeries decreased. VR and AS surgeons maintained a steady but lower volume of SFIOL and SSIOL cases, with increasing ACIOL surgeries. Postoperative visual acuity for the VR and combination cohorts was 54.3 ± 27.8 and 51.5 ± 27.2 (≈ 20/100 Snellen) (P value = 0.102), respectively. Complication rates were similar between cohorts, except for postoperative retinal detachment (VR: 144, 3.5%; combined: 26, 5.1%; P value < 0.001).

Conclusion: ACIOLs were the most commonly performed secondary IOL surgery. However, a shift toward SFIOL and SSIOL techniques among vitreo-retinal surgeons emerged. Outcomes were comparable between approaches.

玻璃体视网膜外科医生与玻璃体视网膜和前段外科医生相比,二次人工晶状体应用的趋势和结果。
背景与目的:巩膜固定人工晶状体(SFIOL)、巩膜缝合人工晶状体(SSIOL)、前房人工晶状体(acol)用于治疗无晶状体或晶状体半脱位。本研究比较了基于外科医生类型的二期人工晶状体植入术技术和结果的发展趋势。患者和方法:本回顾性研究包括2015年至2024年在美国(US)视网膜中心接受玻璃体视网膜(VR队列)或VR和前段(AS)(联合队列)手术的患者。评估的并发症包括视网膜脱离、眼内炎、缝合线糜烂、触觉糜烂、重复平面玻璃体切除术和角膜水肿。结果:虚拟现实外科医生共进行了4143例二期人工晶状体手术(1977例acol, 1327例SFIOL, 839例SSIOL),而虚拟现实和人工晶状体外科医生共进行了511例(342例acol, 125例SFIOL, 44例SSIOL)。虚拟外科医生的SFIOL和SSIOL手术增加,而acol手术减少。随着acol手术的增加,VR和AS外科医生的SFIOL和SSIOL病例数量保持稳定但较低。VR组和联合组术后视力分别为54.3±27.8和51.5±27.2(≈20/100 Snellen) (P值= 0.102)。除术后视网膜脱离外,各组间并发症发生率相似(VR: 144,3.5%;联合:26,5.1%;P值< 0.001)。结论:acol是最常见的二期人工晶状体手术。然而,在玻璃体视网膜外科医生中出现了向SFIOL和SSIOL技术的转变。两种方法的结果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信