Providers' use and perceived benefits and barriers of delivering cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares (CBT-N) to veterans.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1037/ser0000994
Katherine E Miller, Courtney J Bolstad, Jessica A Carlile, Noelle E Balliett, Shilpa Trivedi, Joanne L Davis, Jessica Schubert, Christina Krieg, Mauli Shah
{"title":"Providers' use and perceived benefits and barriers of delivering cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares (CBT-N) to veterans.","authors":"Katherine E Miller, Courtney J Bolstad, Jessica A Carlile, Noelle E Balliett, Shilpa Trivedi, Joanne L Davis, Jessica Schubert, Christina Krieg, Mauli Shah","doi":"10.1037/ser0000994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Training and consultation in cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares (CBT-N) were introduced for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) providers to reduce the frequency and severity of nightmares and improve functioning of veterans experiencing chronic nightmares. This study aimed to evaluate providers' sustained delivery of CBT-N and their perceptions of benefits and barriers to implementation to improve the successful adoption and long-term use of CBT-N throughout the VHA. VHA providers (<i>N</i> = 100) who completed the CBT-N training program at least 6 months prior to the study were sent an online survey about their continued use, feedback, and perceptions of CBT-N. The survey received a 65% response rate. Overall, perceptions of CBT-N were favorable. Ninety-five percent of providers reported continued delivery of CBT-N since completing the training program, with 100% of responders intending to use CBT-N in the future. Among CBT-N users, treatment was perceived to reduce nightmare frequency and/or severity and improve other domains of functioning (i.e., sleep health, trauma symptoms, quality of life). A third of the CBT-N users denied any barriers to using CBT-N. Primary barriers to use were related to providers' facility inner setting (e.g., unable to accommodate required session length or frequency, veteran population not appropriate for CBT-N) or veteran factors (e.g., schedule constraints, patient decision in shared decision making). Results encourage ongoing CBT-N training initiatives within the VHA. Directly tracking veteran outcomes and identifying necessary modifications to adapt CBT-N within the constraints of the inner setting, while preserving treatment integrity, are warranted to ensure and promote intervention effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Training and consultation in cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares (CBT-N) were introduced for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) providers to reduce the frequency and severity of nightmares and improve functioning of veterans experiencing chronic nightmares. This study aimed to evaluate providers' sustained delivery of CBT-N and their perceptions of benefits and barriers to implementation to improve the successful adoption and long-term use of CBT-N throughout the VHA. VHA providers (N = 100) who completed the CBT-N training program at least 6 months prior to the study were sent an online survey about their continued use, feedback, and perceptions of CBT-N. The survey received a 65% response rate. Overall, perceptions of CBT-N were favorable. Ninety-five percent of providers reported continued delivery of CBT-N since completing the training program, with 100% of responders intending to use CBT-N in the future. Among CBT-N users, treatment was perceived to reduce nightmare frequency and/or severity and improve other domains of functioning (i.e., sleep health, trauma symptoms, quality of life). A third of the CBT-N users denied any barriers to using CBT-N. Primary barriers to use were related to providers' facility inner setting (e.g., unable to accommodate required session length or frequency, veteran population not appropriate for CBT-N) or veteran factors (e.g., schedule constraints, patient decision in shared decision making). Results encourage ongoing CBT-N training initiatives within the VHA. Directly tracking veteran outcomes and identifying necessary modifications to adapt CBT-N within the constraints of the inner setting, while preserving treatment integrity, are warranted to ensure and promote intervention effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

提供者对退伍军人提供噩梦认知行为疗法(CBT-N)的使用和感知的好处和障碍。
对退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的服务提供者进行了噩梦认知行为疗法(CBT-N)的培训和咨询,以减少噩梦的频率和严重程度,并改善经历慢性噩梦的退伍军人的功能。本研究旨在评估提供者持续提供CBT-N的情况,以及他们对实施CBT-N的好处和障碍的看法,以提高CBT-N在整个VHA的成功采用和长期使用。在研究前至少6个月完成CBT-N培训计划的VHA提供者(N = 100)被发送一份关于他们继续使用、反馈和对CBT-N的看法的在线调查。该调查的回复率为65%。总体而言,对CBT-N的看法是有利的。95%的提供者报告说,在完成培训计划后继续提供CBT-N, 100%的应答者打算在未来使用CBT-N。在CBT-N使用者中,治疗被认为可以减少噩梦的频率和/或严重程度,并改善其他功能领域(即睡眠健康、创伤症状、生活质量)。三分之一的CBT-N使用者否认使用CBT-N有任何障碍。使用的主要障碍与提供者的设施内部环境有关(例如,无法适应所需的疗程长度或频率,退伍军人不适合CBT-N)或退伍军人因素(例如,时间表限制,共同决策中的患者决策)。结果鼓励在VHA内开展CBT-N培训活动。在保持治疗完整性的同时,直接跟踪退伍军人的治疗结果,确定必要的修改以适应CBT-N,以确保和促进干预的有效性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书