A Systematic Review of Health Disparities in Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the United States.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70163
Russell A Whitehead, Abdel R Metwally, Evan A Patel, Thomas Cyberski, Robin Powszok, Peter Filip, Peter Papagiannopoulos, Bobby A Tajudeen, Pete S Batra
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Health Disparities in Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the United States.","authors":"Russell A Whitehead, Abdel R Metwally, Evan A Patel, Thomas Cyberski, Robin Powszok, Peter Filip, Peter Papagiannopoulos, Bobby A Tajudeen, Pete S Batra","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Literature describing disparities in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) often analyzes race, gender, or socioeconomic status (SES) in isolation. Analyses encompassing a comprehensive range of disparities remain lacking. We conducted a systematic review to provide a detailed characterization of the CRS disparity landscape.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in Covidence adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, etc. was performed for literature published through September 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A total of 690 publications were identified and screened by two authors independently. In total, 26 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Studies were classified by pertaining health disparity (race, gender, SES, age, and geographic region) and reported outcomes (incidence, severity, and treatment choice).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 studies on CRS disparities were published from 2012 to 2024. 16 focused on SES, describing that lower SES was associated with reduced treatment adherence, resulting in poorer endoscopic findings and quality of life. 14 studies examined racial/ethnic disparities. Hispanic patients were more symptomatic than non-Hispanic patients, whereas black patients had fewer health visits, leading to worse outcomes. Other studies discussed the impact of gender, age, and/or geographic region (n = 9, 4, 4, respectively). Findings included higher symptom burden among female patients and higher CRS incidence in regions of air pollution. Only three studies proposed solutions to disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most literature on CRS disparities describes the influence of SES and race on disease presentation and progression. Other disparities related to gender, age, and geographic region were identified. Further research should uncover root causes and propose detailed solutions to advance equitable care in CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 3","pages":"e70163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Literature describing disparities in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) often analyzes race, gender, or socioeconomic status (SES) in isolation. Analyses encompassing a comprehensive range of disparities remain lacking. We conducted a systematic review to provide a detailed characterization of the CRS disparity landscape.

Data sources: A systematic review was conducted in Covidence adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, etc. was performed for literature published through September 2024.

Review methods: A total of 690 publications were identified and screened by two authors independently. In total, 26 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Studies were classified by pertaining health disparity (race, gender, SES, age, and geographic region) and reported outcomes (incidence, severity, and treatment choice).

Results: In total, 26 studies on CRS disparities were published from 2012 to 2024. 16 focused on SES, describing that lower SES was associated with reduced treatment adherence, resulting in poorer endoscopic findings and quality of life. 14 studies examined racial/ethnic disparities. Hispanic patients were more symptomatic than non-Hispanic patients, whereas black patients had fewer health visits, leading to worse outcomes. Other studies discussed the impact of gender, age, and/or geographic region (n = 9, 4, 4, respectively). Findings included higher symptom burden among female patients and higher CRS incidence in regions of air pollution. Only three studies proposed solutions to disparities.

Conclusion: Most literature on CRS disparities describes the influence of SES and race on disease presentation and progression. Other disparities related to gender, age, and geographic region were identified. Further research should uncover root causes and propose detailed solutions to advance equitable care in CRS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国慢性鼻窦炎健康差异的系统综述
目的:描述慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)差异的文献通常单独分析种族、性别或社会经济地位(SES)。目前仍然缺乏对各种差异的全面分析。我们进行了一项系统综述,以提供CRS差异景观的详细特征。数据来源:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,在covid - 19中进行了系统评价。检索PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus等,检索截止2024年9月发表的文献。综述方法:共有690篇文献由两位作者独立进行鉴定和筛选。总共有26人最终达到了入选标准。根据相关的健康差异(种族、性别、社会经济地位、年龄和地理区域)和报告的结果(发病率、严重程度和治疗选择)对研究进行分类。结果:2012 - 2024年共发表了26篇关于CRS差异的研究。16专注于SES,描述了较低的SES与治疗依从性降低相关,导致较差的内镜检查结果和生活质量。14项研究调查了种族/民族差异。西班牙裔患者比非西班牙裔患者更有症状,而黑人患者就诊次数较少,导致结果更差。其他研究讨论了性别、年龄和/或地理区域的影响(n = 9、4、4)。结果显示,女性患者的症状负担较高,空气污染地区CRS发病率较高。只有三项研究提出了解决差距的办法。结论:大多数关于CRS差异的文献描述了社会经济地位和种族对疾病表现和进展的影响。还发现了与性别、年龄和地理区域有关的其他差异。进一步的研究应发现根本原因并提出详细的解决方案,以促进CRS中的公平护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信