Safety Listening in High-Risk Situations: A Qualitative Analysis of Responses to Safety Voice in Aviation.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI:10.1111/risa.70106
Alyssa M Pandolfo, Tom W Reader, Alex Gillespie
{"title":"Safety Listening in High-Risk Situations: A Qualitative Analysis of Responses to Safety Voice in Aviation.","authors":"Alyssa M Pandolfo, Tom W Reader, Alex Gillespie","doi":"10.1111/risa.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety listening-responses to voice acts aimed at preventing harm-can avert organizational failures like airplane crashes. Research often focuses on attitudes and perceptions of listening using self-report measures; consequently, little is known about how safety listening occurs behaviorally and influences safety outcomes in high-risk situations. Using directed and summative content analysis, we analyzed 45 transcripts of flightdeck communication before crashes and near misses to develop a framework of safety listening behavior in risky contexts. We also used abductive top-down theorizing to identify the processes through which such behaviors prevent harm. We propose that effective safety listening behaviors engage with voice through action and sensemaking, whereas ineffective listening behaviors dismiss or exhibit token engagement with speaking-up. Our analysis illustrates that engaging with voice enables teams to develop shared and accurate situation awareness of emerging risks, thus potentially averting accidents. Our findings demonstrate the importance of a behavioral approach to safety listening, illustrating that assessing listener engagement with safety voice-rather than attitudes-can provide an accurate and practical explanation for how safety listening influences organizational safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety listening-responses to voice acts aimed at preventing harm-can avert organizational failures like airplane crashes. Research often focuses on attitudes and perceptions of listening using self-report measures; consequently, little is known about how safety listening occurs behaviorally and influences safety outcomes in high-risk situations. Using directed and summative content analysis, we analyzed 45 transcripts of flightdeck communication before crashes and near misses to develop a framework of safety listening behavior in risky contexts. We also used abductive top-down theorizing to identify the processes through which such behaviors prevent harm. We propose that effective safety listening behaviors engage with voice through action and sensemaking, whereas ineffective listening behaviors dismiss or exhibit token engagement with speaking-up. Our analysis illustrates that engaging with voice enables teams to develop shared and accurate situation awareness of emerging risks, thus potentially averting accidents. Our findings demonstrate the importance of a behavioral approach to safety listening, illustrating that assessing listener engagement with safety voice-rather than attitudes-can provide an accurate and practical explanation for how safety listening influences organizational safety outcomes.

高风险情况下的安全聆听:航空安全声音响应的定性分析。
安全监听——对旨在防止伤害的声音行为做出反应——可以避免像飞机失事那样的组织故障。研究通常侧重于使用自我报告测量的态度和听觉感知;因此,在高风险情况下,人们对安全倾听如何在行为上发生以及如何影响安全结果知之甚少。使用定向和总结性内容分析,我们分析了45份坠毁前和未遂事故前的驾驶舱通信记录,以建立一个危险环境下安全聆听行为的框架。我们还使用溯因性自上而下的理论来确定这些行为防止伤害的过程。我们认为,有效的安全倾听行为通过行动和意义建构来参与发声,而无效的倾听行为则忽略或表现出象征性地参与发声。我们的分析表明,使用语音使团队能够对新出现的风险形成共享和准确的态势感知,从而潜在地避免事故。我们的研究结果证明了行为方法对安全倾听的重要性,说明了评估听者对安全声音的参与,而不是态度,可以为安全倾听如何影响组织安全结果提供准确和实用的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信