[Digital health and its impacts on the access of minority groups to primary care: a systematic reviewLa salud digital y su impacto en el acceso a la atención primaria de salud en grupos minoritarios: revisión sistemática].

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gabriela de Oliveira Laguna Silva, Gabriel Ricardo Fernandes, Jacqueline Castro da Rocha, Gabriela Tizianel Aguilar, Isadora D'Avila Lottici, Andressa Dutra Dode, Felipe Cezar Cabral, Taís de Campos Moreira, Maria Eulália Vinadé Chagas
{"title":"[Digital health and its impacts on the access of minority groups to primary care: a systematic reviewLa salud digital y su impacto en el acceso a la atención primaria de salud en grupos minoritarios: revisión sistemática].","authors":"Gabriela de Oliveira Laguna Silva, Gabriel Ricardo Fernandes, Jacqueline Castro da Rocha, Gabriela Tizianel Aguilar, Isadora D'Avila Lottici, Andressa Dutra Dode, Felipe Cezar Cabral, Taís de Campos Moreira, Maria Eulália Vinadé Chagas","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2025.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify digital interventions applied in the context of primary health care (PHC) and assess their impact on access to health care by minority population groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of randomized clinical trials evaluating digital interventions in PHC settings, with health care access as the primary outcome. Searches were carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases up to January 2025, with no restrictions regarding language, country, or year. The interventions were further analyzed using the PROGRESS-Plus framework to identify the social vulnerability markers addressed in the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included, all conducted in the United States, focusing on populations vulnerable due to race (Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals), gender (women), education level (individuals with low educational attainment), and socioeconomic status (low-income individuals). Most participants (adults aged 30 to 60 years) were overweight or obese and had chronic comorbidities. In all studies, digital solutions were integrated into interprofessional practices involving dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, and/or psychologists, and were successful in improving clinical outcomes and expanding access to care. However, barriers related to digital and health literacy were reported, as well as difficulties using digital tools, particularly among participants with lower educational levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Realizing the equity potential of digital interventions requires overcoming barriers such as limited literacy, low connectivity, and social inequality through participatory design approaches and public policies guided by principles of social justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"49 ","pages":"e96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2025.96","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify digital interventions applied in the context of primary health care (PHC) and assess their impact on access to health care by minority population groups.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized clinical trials evaluating digital interventions in PHC settings, with health care access as the primary outcome. Searches were carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases up to January 2025, with no restrictions regarding language, country, or year. The interventions were further analyzed using the PROGRESS-Plus framework to identify the social vulnerability markers addressed in the studies.

Results: Six studies were included, all conducted in the United States, focusing on populations vulnerable due to race (Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals), gender (women), education level (individuals with low educational attainment), and socioeconomic status (low-income individuals). Most participants (adults aged 30 to 60 years) were overweight or obese and had chronic comorbidities. In all studies, digital solutions were integrated into interprofessional practices involving dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, and/or psychologists, and were successful in improving clinical outcomes and expanding access to care. However, barriers related to digital and health literacy were reported, as well as difficulties using digital tools, particularly among participants with lower educational levels.

Conclusion: Realizing the equity potential of digital interventions requires overcoming barriers such as limited literacy, low connectivity, and social inequality through participatory design approaches and public policies guided by principles of social justice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[数字卫生及其对少数群体获得初级卫生保健的影响:系统综述]。
目的:确定在初级卫生保健(PHC)背景下应用的数字干预措施,并评估其对少数群体获得卫生保健的影响。方法:我们对评估初级保健环境中数字干预措施的随机临床试验进行了系统回顾,以医疗保健可及性为主要结果。检索在PubMed、Scopus和LILACS数据库中进行,截止到2025年1月,没有关于语言、国家或年份的限制。使用PROGRESS-Plus框架进一步分析干预措施,以确定研究中涉及的社会脆弱性标志。结果:纳入了6项研究,均在美国进行,重点关注因种族(黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体)、性别(女性)、教育水平(受教育程度低的个体)和社会经济地位(低收入个体)而易受伤害的人群。大多数参与者(30至60岁的成年人)超重或肥胖,并有慢性合并症。在所有的研究中,数字解决方案被整合到涉及营养师、护士、药剂师、医生和/或心理学家的跨专业实践中,并成功地改善了临床结果和扩大了护理的可及性。然而,据报告,在数字和卫生素养方面存在障碍,以及在使用数字工具方面存在困难,特别是在受教育程度较低的参与者中。结论:实现数字干预的公平潜力,需要通过参与式设计方法和以社会正义原则为指导的公共政策,克服识字率有限、连通性低和社会不平等等障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信