Thoracoscopic internal traction for long-gap esophageal atresia: outcomes, challenges, and complications.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Ulgen Celtik, Cengiz Sahutoglu, Coskun Ozcan, Zafer Dokumcu
{"title":"Thoracoscopic internal traction for long-gap esophageal atresia: outcomes, challenges, and complications.","authors":"Ulgen Celtik, Cengiz Sahutoglu, Coskun Ozcan, Zafer Dokumcu","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-06186-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate our institutional experience with thoracoscopic staged repair with internal traction (TSRIT) in the management of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), focusing on surgical techniques, early and late outcomes, and functional results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Between 2019 and 2024, EA patients who underwent TSIRT in LGEA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgical details, and early and late complications were collected. Early-late complications were compared between groups. Causes of traction failure and complications were examined. Swallowing function was assessed using the Pediatric EAT-10 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients (Type A/B:5/8) underwent TSIRT. Traction failed in three cases (Type A/B:1/2), and these patients were referred to replacement surgery. Definitive anastomosis was successfully achieved in 10 of 13 patients. In 3 cases, traction failed due to technical or anatomical factors. Early complications included 4 anastomotic leaks (A/B:3/1) and 2 strictures(A/B:0/2); all were managed conservatively. Late complications included mild anastomotic strictures in 5 patients(A/B:1/4) and gastroesophageal reflux in 3(A/B:0/3), none of whom required fundoplication. All patients demonstrated adequate growth during follow-up, and most achieved satisfactory oral intake. The medium follow-up time was similar between the groups, with a mean follow-up duration of 30 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the long-term follow-up, the majority of patients demonstrated good oral intake. The failure rate was 23%. While no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding early and late complications, the higher incidence of complications in the Type B group suggests that these patients require closer monitoring and more meticulous management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06186-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate our institutional experience with thoracoscopic staged repair with internal traction (TSRIT) in the management of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), focusing on surgical techniques, early and late outcomes, and functional results.

Method: Between 2019 and 2024, EA patients who underwent TSIRT in LGEA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgical details, and early and late complications were collected. Early-late complications were compared between groups. Causes of traction failure and complications were examined. Swallowing function was assessed using the Pediatric EAT-10 score.

Results: Thirteen patients (Type A/B:5/8) underwent TSIRT. Traction failed in three cases (Type A/B:1/2), and these patients were referred to replacement surgery. Definitive anastomosis was successfully achieved in 10 of 13 patients. In 3 cases, traction failed due to technical or anatomical factors. Early complications included 4 anastomotic leaks (A/B:3/1) and 2 strictures(A/B:0/2); all were managed conservatively. Late complications included mild anastomotic strictures in 5 patients(A/B:1/4) and gastroesophageal reflux in 3(A/B:0/3), none of whom required fundoplication. All patients demonstrated adequate growth during follow-up, and most achieved satisfactory oral intake. The medium follow-up time was similar between the groups, with a mean follow-up duration of 30 months.

Conclusion: In the long-term follow-up, the majority of patients demonstrated good oral intake. The failure rate was 23%. While no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding early and late complications, the higher incidence of complications in the Type B group suggests that these patients require closer monitoring and more meticulous management.

胸腔镜内牵引治疗长间隙食管闭锁:结果、挑战和并发症。
目的:评价我院胸腔镜内牵引分阶段修复(TSRIT)治疗长间隙食管闭锁(LGEA)的经验,重点探讨手术技术、早期和晚期预后以及功能结果。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年期间在LGEA中接受tsit治疗的EA患者。统计资料、手术细节、早期和晚期并发症。组间早、晚期并发症比较。检查牵引失败及并发症的原因。吞咽功能采用儿科EAT-10评分进行评估。结果:13例患者(A/B型:5/8)接受了tsit治疗。3例(A/B型:1/2)牵引失败,这些患者被转介到置换手术。13例患者中有10例吻合成功。3例因技术或解剖因素导致牵引失败。早期并发症包括吻合口瘘4例(A/B:3/1),狭窄2例(A/B:0/2);所有这些都是保守管理。晚期并发症包括轻度吻合口狭窄5例(A/B:1/4),胃食管反流3例(A/B:0/3),均不需要吻合口。所有患者在随访期间均表现出足够的生长,并且大多数患者的口服摄入量令人满意。两组间的中期随访时间相似,平均随访时间为30个月。结论:在长期随访中,大多数患者的口服摄入良好。失败率为23%。虽然两组间早期和晚期并发症发生率无统计学差异,但B型组并发症发生率较高,提示B型组患者需要更密切的监测和更细致的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信