A life cycle assessment of peritoneal dialysis procurement in Italy: environmental burden and opportunities for improvement.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
James Larkin, Giulia Ligabue, Gaetano Alfano, Rodrigo Martínez Cadenas, Abass Fehintola, Ingeborg Steinbach, Aycan Yasar, Niccolo Morisi, Marta Arias-Guillen, Marialuisa Caiazzo, Gabriele Donati, Brett Duane
{"title":"A life cycle assessment of peritoneal dialysis procurement in Italy: environmental burden and opportunities for improvement.","authors":"James Larkin, Giulia Ligabue, Gaetano Alfano, Rodrigo Martínez Cadenas, Abass Fehintola, Ingeborg Steinbach, Aycan Yasar, Niccolo Morisi, Marta Arias-Guillen, Marialuisa Caiazzo, Gabriele Donati, Brett Duane","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02409-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Procurement activities in healthcare, especially within nephrology, contribute significantly to the environmental footprint. In peritoneal dialysis (PD), procurement of consumables such as dialysis bags, tubing, and machines plays a critical role in driving environmental impacts. Previous studies, including those by the National Health Service (NHS), have shown that procurement can account for up to 72% of the healthcare sector's carbon emissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted from April to July 2024 at the Nephrology Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Unit of AOU Policlinico di Modena, Italy, in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards. The study focused on procurement-related environmental impacts in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), based on a standard prescription of two 5L bags overnight and one 2L daytime dwell per day. Products were dismantled to assess materials and modelled using OpenLCA with the Ecoinvent v3.10 database. Transportation, manufacturing, and waste disposal were included within system boundaries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5L Dialysate Bag (used twice daily) had the highest carbon footprint (1515 kg carbon dioxide equivalent [CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/year]), followed by the 2L Bag (457 kg) and Automated Drainage System (286 kg). Primary drivers were long-distance transport, plastic production (especially polyethylene and PVC), and energy-intensive manufacturing. Although the 5L bags are used in greater quantities due to the APD prescription (typically two bags per night), it still showed a lower carbon footprint per litre of dialysate delivered (0.415 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/L) compared to the 2L bag (0.626 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/L). Smaller items like disinfectant sprays and medical kits contributed less individually but were used frequently. Across all categories, plastic production, packaging, electricity use, and incineration were key contributors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The environmental impact of PD procurement is concentrated in a few high-use, high-impact items. Reduction strategies should target material substitutions, modular product design, and lower-emission transport and energy use. Innovations such as local dialysate mixing, improved waste segregation, and increased recyclability could substantially reduce the environmental burden of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02409-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Procurement activities in healthcare, especially within nephrology, contribute significantly to the environmental footprint. In peritoneal dialysis (PD), procurement of consumables such as dialysis bags, tubing, and machines plays a critical role in driving environmental impacts. Previous studies, including those by the National Health Service (NHS), have shown that procurement can account for up to 72% of the healthcare sector's carbon emissions.

Methods: A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted from April to July 2024 at the Nephrology Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Unit of AOU Policlinico di Modena, Italy, in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards. The study focused on procurement-related environmental impacts in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), based on a standard prescription of two 5L bags overnight and one 2L daytime dwell per day. Products were dismantled to assess materials and modelled using OpenLCA with the Ecoinvent v3.10 database. Transportation, manufacturing, and waste disposal were included within system boundaries.

Results: The 5L Dialysate Bag (used twice daily) had the highest carbon footprint (1515 kg carbon dioxide equivalent [CO2-eq/year]), followed by the 2L Bag (457 kg) and Automated Drainage System (286 kg). Primary drivers were long-distance transport, plastic production (especially polyethylene and PVC), and energy-intensive manufacturing. Although the 5L bags are used in greater quantities due to the APD prescription (typically two bags per night), it still showed a lower carbon footprint per litre of dialysate delivered (0.415 kg CO2-eq/L) compared to the 2L bag (0.626 kg CO2-eq/L). Smaller items like disinfectant sprays and medical kits contributed less individually but were used frequently. Across all categories, plastic production, packaging, electricity use, and incineration were key contributors.

Conclusion: The environmental impact of PD procurement is concentrated in a few high-use, high-impact items. Reduction strategies should target material substitutions, modular product design, and lower-emission transport and energy use. Innovations such as local dialysate mixing, improved waste segregation, and increased recyclability could substantially reduce the environmental burden of PD.

意大利腹膜透析采购的生命周期评估:环境负担和改善的机会。
背景:医疗保健领域的采购活动,特别是肾病领域的采购活动,对环境影响很大。在腹膜透析(PD)中,耗材如透析袋、透析管和透析机的采购在推动环境影响方面起着关键作用。此前的研究,包括英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的研究表明,采购可能占医疗行业碳排放量的72%。方法:根据ISO 14040/14044标准,于2024年4月至7月在意大利摩德纳AOU polilinico肾透析和肾移植单元进行生命周期评估(LCA)。该研究的重点是自动腹膜透析(APD)中采购相关的环境影响,基于每天两个5L袋过夜和一个2L日间居住的标准处方。拆卸产品以评估材料,并使用OpenLCA与Ecoinvent v3.10数据库进行建模。运输、制造和废物处理都包括在系统边界内。结果:5L透析液袋(每天使用两次)的碳足迹最高(1515 kg二氧化碳当量[CO2-eq/年]),其次是2L透析液袋(457 kg)和自动排水系统(286 kg)。主要驱动因素是长途运输、塑料生产(尤其是聚乙烯和聚氯乙烯)和能源密集型制造业。尽管由于APD处方(通常每晚两袋),5L袋的使用量较大,但与2L袋(0.626 kg co2当量/升)相比,每升透析液的碳足迹(0.415 kg co2当量/升)仍然较低。消毒喷雾和医疗包等较小的物品单独造成的影响较小,但使用频率很高。在所有类别中,塑料生产、包装、电力使用和焚烧是主要贡献者。结论:PD采购的环境影响主要集中在少数高使用、高影响的项目上。减少战略应以材料替代、模块化产品设计、低排放运输和能源使用为目标。诸如局部透析液混合、改进废物分离和提高可回收性等创新可以大大减轻PD的环境负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信