Surgical Efficacy After Viscogonioplasty in Primary Angle Closure Disease with Different Mechanisms.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jin Wang, Yue Wang, Ye Zhang, Xin Tang, Dabo Wang, Ningli Wang, Dapeng Mou
{"title":"Surgical Efficacy After Viscogonioplasty in Primary Angle Closure Disease with Different Mechanisms.","authors":"Jin Wang, Yue Wang, Ye Zhang, Xin Tang, Dabo Wang, Ningli Wang, Dapeng Mou","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>Non-pupillary block mechanisms are associated with larger postoperative peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) extent at 1-year follow-up compared to pupillary block mechanisms in primary angle-closure disease (PACD).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of preoperative angle-closure mechanisms on surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (PEI) combined with VGP in PACD patients with cataracts.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study enrolled 56 patients (68 eyes) with PACD and cataracts. Participants were classified into pupillary block (PB) and non-pupillary block (Non-PB) groups based on the anatomical characteristics of angle closure shown in preoperative ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging. Primary outcomes included peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) extent, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of IOP-lowering medications over a 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant reductions in PAS extent at the end of surgery compared to the baseline. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the Non-PB group exhibited significantly larger PAS extent compared to the PB group (P=0.025 and P=0.017, respectively). Both groups demonstrated significant IOP reduction and decreased use of IOP-lowering medications postoperatively, with no significant differences between groups. The overall complete and qualified success rates at 12 months were 71.6% and 98.5%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-PB mechanisms are associated with larger postoperative PAS extent at 1-year follow-up compared to PB mechanisms, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive preoperative angle-closure mechanisms assessment in predicting and potentially minimizing PAS progression for enhanced long-term surgical efficacy in PACD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precis: Non-pupillary block mechanisms are associated with larger postoperative peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) extent at 1-year follow-up compared to pupillary block mechanisms in primary angle-closure disease (PACD).

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of preoperative angle-closure mechanisms on surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (PEI) combined with VGP in PACD patients with cataracts.

Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 56 patients (68 eyes) with PACD and cataracts. Participants were classified into pupillary block (PB) and non-pupillary block (Non-PB) groups based on the anatomical characteristics of angle closure shown in preoperative ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging. Primary outcomes included peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) extent, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of IOP-lowering medications over a 12-month follow-up period.

Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in PAS extent at the end of surgery compared to the baseline. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the Non-PB group exhibited significantly larger PAS extent compared to the PB group (P=0.025 and P=0.017, respectively). Both groups demonstrated significant IOP reduction and decreased use of IOP-lowering medications postoperatively, with no significant differences between groups. The overall complete and qualified success rates at 12 months were 71.6% and 98.5%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups.

Conclusions: Non-PB mechanisms are associated with larger postoperative PAS extent at 1-year follow-up compared to PB mechanisms, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive preoperative angle-closure mechanisms assessment in predicting and potentially minimizing PAS progression for enhanced long-term surgical efficacy in PACD treatment.

粘胶成形术治疗原发性不同机制闭角病的疗效。
摘要:与原发性闭角症(PACD)的瞳孔阻滞机制相比,非瞳孔阻滞机制在1年随访中与更大的术后周围前突触(PAS)程度相关。目的:探讨术前闭角机制对PACD合并白内障的超声乳化人工晶状体植入术(PEI)联合VGP手术效果的影响。患者和方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了56例(68只眼)患有PACD和白内障的患者。根据术前超声生物显微成像显示的闭角解剖特征,将参与者分为瞳孔阻滞组(PB)和非瞳孔阻滞组(Non-PB)。主要结局包括周围前粘连(PAS)程度、眼内压(IOP)和在12个月的随访期间使用的降低眼压药物的数量。结果:与基线相比,两组在手术结束时PAS范围均显着减少。术后6个月和12个月,非PB组PAS程度明显大于PB组(P=0.025和P=0.017)。两组术后均表现出明显的IOP降低和降低IOP药物使用的减少,组间无显著差异。12个月的总完成率和合格成功率分别为71.6%和98.5%,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:在1年随访中,与PB机制相比,非PB机制与更大的术后PAS程度相关,强调了术前全面的闭角机制评估在预测和潜在地减少PAS进展方面的重要性,以提高PACD治疗的长期手术疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信