Allison N Patrick, Kay Bernard, R Andrew Tirpak, Ian M Simpson, Joseph S Smith, Ryan J Winston
{"title":"Hydrologic and water quality performance of an 8-year old bioretention cell treating residential runoff.","authors":"Allison N Patrick, Kay Bernard, R Andrew Tirpak, Ian M Simpson, Joseph S Smith, Ryan J Winston","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioretention cells (BRCs) are among the most popular low-impact development techniques in the United States. They effectively mitigate the runoff hydrograph and excessive pollutant loadings affected by widespread urbanization. Overwhelmingly, the literature focuses on the effectiveness of newly constructed BRCs and does not account for the variety of designs found in BRCs installed less recently. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a BRC in mitigating runoff quantity, reducing peak flow rate, and improving water quality parameters (i.e., sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, and indicator bacteria) 8 years post-construction. Total runoff volume reduction was substantial (83%), accredited to mature vegetation promoting evapotranspiration, canopy interception, and hydraulic properties of the mature BRC soil. Additionally, the BRC provided similar peak flow mitigation (median 93%) to newly constructed BRCs in the literature. Significant reductions in event mean concentrations and loads of sediments (>88%), particulate-bound nutrients (>60%), and heavy metals (>70%) were observed. In many cases, the BRC had better - or at least similar - pollutant removal efficiencies than younger BRCs. The excellent function of this BRC provides evidence that these systems may improve over time, given proper long-term maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"92 5","pages":"752-769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bioretention cells (BRCs) are among the most popular low-impact development techniques in the United States. They effectively mitigate the runoff hydrograph and excessive pollutant loadings affected by widespread urbanization. Overwhelmingly, the literature focuses on the effectiveness of newly constructed BRCs and does not account for the variety of designs found in BRCs installed less recently. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a BRC in mitigating runoff quantity, reducing peak flow rate, and improving water quality parameters (i.e., sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, and indicator bacteria) 8 years post-construction. Total runoff volume reduction was substantial (83%), accredited to mature vegetation promoting evapotranspiration, canopy interception, and hydraulic properties of the mature BRC soil. Additionally, the BRC provided similar peak flow mitigation (median 93%) to newly constructed BRCs in the literature. Significant reductions in event mean concentrations and loads of sediments (>88%), particulate-bound nutrients (>60%), and heavy metals (>70%) were observed. In many cases, the BRC had better - or at least similar - pollutant removal efficiencies than younger BRCs. The excellent function of this BRC provides evidence that these systems may improve over time, given proper long-term maintenance.
期刊介绍:
Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.