Perceptions on Facial Profile Aesthetics: A Survey of Young People and Orthodontists.

Q2 Dentistry
Beatriz Larena-Morencos, Ana Belén Macías-Gago, Iván Nieto-Sánchez, Víctor Gómez-Clemente
{"title":"Perceptions on Facial Profile Aesthetics: A Survey of Young People and Orthodontists.","authors":"Beatriz Larena-Morencos, Ana Belén Macías-Gago, Iván Nieto-Sánchez, Víctor Gómez-Clemente","doi":"10.4317/jced.62939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to understand the perceptions of young non-dental professionals and orthodontists on the aesthetics of facial profile.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Perceptions were assessed using seven types of profile for both sexes, which represented different relations of the maxilla and mandible. In total, 50 young laypeople and 20 orthodontists were randomly selected to evaluate the aesthetics of each profile using numbers 1 to 10 to rank them in order of attractiveness. Aesthetics score was considered as a quantitative variable and comparison between groups was done with an ANOVA, and age and orthodontic treatment history of the evaluators from the young non-dental population was used as covariates to assess its possible effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following female profiles were rated as most aesthetic: protruding jaw (<i>p</i><.001; R2:21.9%) and retruded jaw (<i>p</i><.001; R2:22.1%). The following male profiles were rated as most aesthetic: retruded maxilla (<i>p</i>=.001; R2:14.7%), bi-protruding maxilla and mandible (<i>p</i><.001; R2: 54.4%) and straight maxilla and mandible (<i>p</i><.05; R2:8.7%). Based on the sex of the evaluator, only significant differences were observed in these two male profiles. The straight profile showed significant differences (<i>p</i><.10) with a moderate effect (4.3%), and the bi-retruded profile (<i>p</i><.05) also had a moderate effect (8.5%); these were rated higher by men. Insufficient statistical evidence was found to admit that a history of orthodontic treatment influences aesthetic perception of male or female profiles. For all the variables, evaluators from the young population scored higher than orthodontists for both male and female profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The straight profile was considered more aesthetic for both sexes. Differences in aesthetic perception depending on sex and previous clinical history of orthodontic treatment were minimal. It can be concluded that the young lay population is less demanding in its evaluations than orthodontists. <b>Key words:</b>Orthodontics, facial profile, aesthetic, aesthetic perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e951-e957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to understand the perceptions of young non-dental professionals and orthodontists on the aesthetics of facial profile.

Material and methods: Perceptions were assessed using seven types of profile for both sexes, which represented different relations of the maxilla and mandible. In total, 50 young laypeople and 20 orthodontists were randomly selected to evaluate the aesthetics of each profile using numbers 1 to 10 to rank them in order of attractiveness. Aesthetics score was considered as a quantitative variable and comparison between groups was done with an ANOVA, and age and orthodontic treatment history of the evaluators from the young non-dental population was used as covariates to assess its possible effect.

Results: The following female profiles were rated as most aesthetic: protruding jaw (p<.001; R2:21.9%) and retruded jaw (p<.001; R2:22.1%). The following male profiles were rated as most aesthetic: retruded maxilla (p=.001; R2:14.7%), bi-protruding maxilla and mandible (p<.001; R2: 54.4%) and straight maxilla and mandible (p<.05; R2:8.7%). Based on the sex of the evaluator, only significant differences were observed in these two male profiles. The straight profile showed significant differences (p<.10) with a moderate effect (4.3%), and the bi-retruded profile (p<.05) also had a moderate effect (8.5%); these were rated higher by men. Insufficient statistical evidence was found to admit that a history of orthodontic treatment influences aesthetic perception of male or female profiles. For all the variables, evaluators from the young population scored higher than orthodontists for both male and female profiles.

Conclusions: The straight profile was considered more aesthetic for both sexes. Differences in aesthetic perception depending on sex and previous clinical history of orthodontic treatment were minimal. It can be concluded that the young lay population is less demanding in its evaluations than orthodontists. Key words:Orthodontics, facial profile, aesthetic, aesthetic perception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青少年与正畸医师对面部轮廓美学的认知。
背景:本研究的目的是了解年轻非牙科专业人员和正畸医师对面部轮廓美学的看法。材料和方法:使用代表上颌骨和下颌骨不同关系的七种两性轮廓来评估感知。总共有50名年轻的外行人和20名正畸医生被随机挑选出来,用数字1到10来评估每个侧面的美学,按照吸引力的顺序对它们进行排名。以美学评分作为定量变量,采用方差分析进行组间比较,以年轻非牙齿人群评价者的年龄和正畸治疗史作为协变量,评估其可能的效果。结果:女性轮廓最美观的是突出的下颌(ppp=.001; R2:14.7%)、双突出的上颌骨和下颌骨(ppp)。结论:两性都认为直型轮廓更美观。审美知觉的差异取决于性别和以前的临床正畸治疗史是最小的。由此可见,年轻的非专业人群对其评价的要求低于正畸医师。关键词:正畸;面部轮廓;美学;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信