Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega, Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva, Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate, Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia, Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga, Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza, Adriana Echevarria-Goche, Eduardo Luján-Urviola, Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock, Katherine Serquen-Olano
{"title":"Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega, Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva, Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate, Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia, Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga, Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza, Adriana Echevarria-Goche, Eduardo Luján-Urviola, Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock, Katherine Serquen-Olano","doi":"10.4317/jced.62997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs. composite resin (CR) in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A bibliographic search was conducted until October 2023, in the biomedical databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials reporting the effect of GIC compared to CR in the restoration of NCCLs were included, without restrictions on publication date or language. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of 296 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 18 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between CR and GIC in the restoration of NCCLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences in clinical performance over time when restoring NCCLs with CRs or GICs. <b>Key words:</b>Non-carious cervical lesion, composite resin, glass ionomer cement, review, meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e995-e1005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To compare the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs. composite resin (CR) in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).
Material and methods: A bibliographic search was conducted until October 2023, in the biomedical databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials reporting the effect of GIC compared to CR in the restoration of NCCLs were included, without restrictions on publication date or language. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.
Results: The search yielded a total of 296 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 18 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between CR and GIC in the restoration of NCCLs.
Conclusions: The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences in clinical performance over time when restoring NCCLs with CRs or GICs. Key words:Non-carious cervical lesion, composite resin, glass ionomer cement, review, meta-analysis.
期刊介绍：
Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
