Personalised and Collaborative Learning Experience (PCLE) Framework for AI-driven Learning Management System (LMS).

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.166248.1
Claireta Tang Weiling, Lew Sook Ling, Ooi Shih Yin
{"title":"Personalised and Collaborative Learning Experience (PCLE) Framework for AI-driven Learning Management System (LMS).","authors":"Claireta Tang Weiling, Lew Sook Ling, Ooi Shih Yin","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.166248.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding student engagement and academic performance is crucial in AI-driven e-learning environments. Many learning management systems (LMS) lack effective collaborative course recommendation strategies, limiting support for personalised learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study developed and evaluated collaborative filtering and machine learning models to generate course recommendations. Machine learning models such as K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), and Neural Collaborative Filtering (NCF) were applied. Two education-related datasets from Kaggle were used. The first contains 100,000 course reviews from Coursera, and the second dataset includes 209,000 course details and comments from Udemy. Data preprocessing was conducted to clean and structure both datasets. The model effectiveness was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Hit Rate (HR), and Average Reciprocal Hit Ranking (ARHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>K-Nearest Neighbours showed the highest performance on the Coursera dataset, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering maintained stable predictive accuracy across both datasets. The findings indicate that dataset characteristics influenced model performance. K-Nearest Neighbours worked effectively with structured and consistent data, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering produced consistent outcomes across diverse datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes to e-learning research by demonstrating the potential of collaborative filtering and machine learning in enhancing course recommendations and promoting engagement in the learning management system. Limitations include the use of two datasets and a limited set of machine learning models. Future work aims to integrate learning styles and evaluate the framework across more diverse educational contexts to support adaptive and collaborative learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166248.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding student engagement and academic performance is crucial in AI-driven e-learning environments. Many learning management systems (LMS) lack effective collaborative course recommendation strategies, limiting support for personalised learning experiences.

Methods: This study developed and evaluated collaborative filtering and machine learning models to generate course recommendations. Machine learning models such as K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), and Neural Collaborative Filtering (NCF) were applied. Two education-related datasets from Kaggle were used. The first contains 100,000 course reviews from Coursera, and the second dataset includes 209,000 course details and comments from Udemy. Data preprocessing was conducted to clean and structure both datasets. The model effectiveness was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Hit Rate (HR), and Average Reciprocal Hit Ranking (ARHR).

Results: K-Nearest Neighbours showed the highest performance on the Coursera dataset, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering maintained stable predictive accuracy across both datasets. The findings indicate that dataset characteristics influenced model performance. K-Nearest Neighbours worked effectively with structured and consistent data, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering produced consistent outcomes across diverse datasets.

Conclusions: This study contributes to e-learning research by demonstrating the potential of collaborative filtering and machine learning in enhancing course recommendations and promoting engagement in the learning management system. Limitations include the use of two datasets and a limited set of machine learning models. Future work aims to integrate learning styles and evaluate the framework across more diverse educational contexts to support adaptive and collaborative learning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能驱动学习管理系统(LMS)的个性化和协作学习体验(PCLE)框架。
背景:在人工智能驱动的电子学习环境中,了解学生的参与度和学习成绩至关重要。许多学习管理系统(LMS)缺乏有效的协作课程推荐策略,限制了对个性化学习体验的支持。方法:本研究开发并评估了协同过滤和机器学习模型,以生成课程推荐。应用了k -最近邻(KNN)、奇异值分解(SVD)和神经协同过滤(NCF)等机器学习模型。使用了来自Kaggle的两个与教育相关的数据集。第一个数据集包含来自Coursera的10万条课程评论,第二个数据集包括来自Udemy的20.9万条课程细节和评论。对数据进行预处理,对两个数据集进行清理和结构化。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、命中率(HR)和平均互惠命中排名(ARHR)来评估模型的有效性。结果:K-Nearest neighbors在Coursera数据集上表现出最高的性能,而奇异值分解和神经协同过滤在两个数据集上都保持了稳定的预测精度。结果表明,数据集特征会影响模型的性能。k近邻有效地处理结构化和一致的数据,而奇异值分解和神经协同过滤在不同的数据集上产生一致的结果。结论:本研究通过展示协同过滤和机器学习在增强课程推荐和促进学习管理系统参与方面的潜力,为电子学习研究做出了贡献。局限性包括使用两个数据集和有限的机器学习模型集。未来的工作旨在整合学习风格,并在更多样化的教育背景下评估该框架,以支持适应性和协作学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信