Impaired face identity discrimination in individuals with cerebral visual impairment: a pilot study.

4区 医学
Annals of translational medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-31 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.21037/atm-25-53
Kerri Walter, Claire E Manley, Lotfi B Merabet, Peter J Bex
{"title":"Impaired face identity discrimination in individuals with cerebral visual impairment: a pilot study.","authors":"Kerri Walter, Claire E Manley, Lotfi B Merabet, Peter J Bex","doi":"10.21037/atm-25-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of pediatric visual impairment and results from brain-related injury or maldevelopment. Higher-order visual processing deficits are commonly reported and can include difficulties recognizing faces, which can adversely affect the development of communication and socialization skills. In this study, we aimed to measure face discrimination ability in CVI compared to controls using a rapid, self-administered, remote paradigm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantified face discrimination ability with a Foraging Interactive D-prime (FInD) paradigm that measured the threshold distance between Basel Model Faces required for participants to report whether faces were of the same or different people. We measured face discrimination thresholds in 8 control and 8 CVI participants viewing forward-facing and tilted faces.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Face discrimination thresholds were significantly higher for CVI than control participants [t(13)=-3.439, P=0.004]. Contrary to controls, CVI participants showed no significant difference between forward-facing and tilted faces [t<sub>(7)</sub>=-1.355, P=0.22]. Importantly, visual acuity did not correlate with face discrimination performance in the CVI group for forward-facing (r=0.040, R<sup>2</sup>=0.002, P=0.93) or tilted faces (r=-0.100, R<sup>2</sup>=0.010, P=0.813). A follow-up experiment with control participants (N=23) manipulating digital blur confirmed that face discrimination ability is resilient to visual acuity differences [t<sub>(22)</sub>=-11.291; P<0.001, d=4.152].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings quantify a face processing deficit in individuals with CVI and show that this impairment is independent of visual acuity. We hypothesize that while control participants can exploit point-wise comparisons between identical images, individuals with CVI possibly do not utilize this additional source of information.</p>","PeriodicalId":8216,"journal":{"name":"Annals of translational medicine","volume":"13 4","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-25-53","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of pediatric visual impairment and results from brain-related injury or maldevelopment. Higher-order visual processing deficits are commonly reported and can include difficulties recognizing faces, which can adversely affect the development of communication and socialization skills. In this study, we aimed to measure face discrimination ability in CVI compared to controls using a rapid, self-administered, remote paradigm.

Methods: We quantified face discrimination ability with a Foraging Interactive D-prime (FInD) paradigm that measured the threshold distance between Basel Model Faces required for participants to report whether faces were of the same or different people. We measured face discrimination thresholds in 8 control and 8 CVI participants viewing forward-facing and tilted faces.

Results: Face discrimination thresholds were significantly higher for CVI than control participants [t(13)=-3.439, P=0.004]. Contrary to controls, CVI participants showed no significant difference between forward-facing and tilted faces [t(7)=-1.355, P=0.22]. Importantly, visual acuity did not correlate with face discrimination performance in the CVI group for forward-facing (r=0.040, R2=0.002, P=0.93) or tilted faces (r=-0.100, R2=0.010, P=0.813). A follow-up experiment with control participants (N=23) manipulating digital blur confirmed that face discrimination ability is resilient to visual acuity differences [t(22)=-11.291; P<0.001, d=4.152].

Conclusions: These findings quantify a face processing deficit in individuals with CVI and show that this impairment is independent of visual acuity. We hypothesize that while control participants can exploit point-wise comparisons between identical images, individuals with CVI possibly do not utilize this additional source of information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑性视觉障碍患者的面孔识别障碍:一项初步研究。
背景:脑性视力障碍(CVI)是儿童视力障碍的主要原因,是脑相关损伤或发育不良的结果。高阶视觉处理缺陷通常被报道,包括识别面孔的困难,这可能对沟通和社交技能的发展产生不利影响。在本研究中,我们旨在使用快速、自我管理、远程范式来测量CVI患者与对照组相比的面部识别能力。方法:我们用觅食交互d -启动(FInD)范式量化了面孔辨别能力,该范式测量了参与者报告面孔是同一人还是不同人所需的巴塞尔模型面孔之间的阈值距离。我们测量了8名控制组和8名CVI组参与者在观看正面脸和倾斜脸时的面部歧视阈值。结果:CVI组的面孔辨别阈值显著高于对照组[t(13)=-3.439, P=0.004]。与对照组相反,CVI参与者的正面脸和倾斜脸没有显著差异[t(7)=-1.355, P=0.22]。重要的是,CVI组的视力与正面(r=0.040, R2=0.002, P=0.93)或倾斜面部(r=-0.100, R2=0.010, P=0.813)的面部识别表现无关。对23名操纵数字模糊的对照组进行的后续实验证实,人脸识别能力对视敏度差异具有弹性[t(22)=-11.291;结论:这些研究结果量化了CVI患者的面部加工缺陷,并表明这种损伤与视力无关。我们假设,虽然对照组参与者可以利用相同图像之间的点对点比较,但患有CVI的个体可能不会利用这种额外的信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
769
期刊介绍: The Annals of Translational Medicine (Ann Transl Med; ATM; Print ISSN 2305-5839; Online ISSN 2305-5847) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal featuring original and observational investigations in the broad fields of laboratory, clinical, and public health research, aiming to provide practical up-to-date information in significant research from all subspecialties of medicine and to broaden the readers’ vision and horizon from bench to bed and bed to bench. It is published quarterly (April 2013- Dec. 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014 - Feb. 2015), biweekly (March 2015-) and openly distributed worldwide. Annals of Translational Medicine is indexed in PubMed in Sept 2014 and in SCIE in 2018. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, epidemiology, biomarkers, imaging, biology, pathology, and technical advances related to medicine. Submissions describing preclinical research with potential for application to human disease, and studies describing research obtained from preliminary human experimentation with potential to further the understanding of biological mechanism underlying disease are encouraged. Also warmly welcome are studies describing public health research pertinent to clinic, disease diagnosis and prevention, or healthcare policy.
 With a focus on interdisciplinary academic cooperation, ATM aims to expedite the translation of scientific discovery into new or improved standards of management and health outcomes practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信