Polish validation of the LGBTQ+ Healthcare Experiences Scale (LGBTQ+ HCES).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Michał Czapla, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Donata Kurpas, Izabella Uchmanowicz, Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Piotr Karniej
{"title":"Polish validation of the LGBTQ+ Healthcare Experiences Scale (LGBTQ+ HCES).","authors":"Michał Czapla, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Donata Kurpas, Izabella Uchmanowicz, Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Piotr Karniej","doi":"10.17219/acem/209762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer individuals frequently encounter disparities in healthcare access, quality and inclusivity. Despite growing awareness of these challenges, Poland has lacked a psychometrically validated tool to assess the experiences of sexual and gender minorities in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate the LGBTQ+ Healthcare Experiences Scale (LGBTQ+ HCES) tailored to the Polish context.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A multi-phase cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025. The initial pool of items was developed through a narrative literature review and refined by 4 researchers with clinical and academic experience in LGBTQ+ health. Content validity was assessed using a 2-round Delphi process involving a multidisciplinary panel of experts (n = 12), who rated item clarity and relevance using Aiken's V. A pilot test with 30 LGBTQ+ participants confirmed comprehension and technical usability. The final 15-item instrument, comprising 3 subscales (Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, Trust and Comfort), was administered to 172 LGBTQ+ individuals recruited via social media. Psychometric evaluation included descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's á, McDonald's ů).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 3-factor model comprising Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, and Trust and Comfort. Model fit indices met recommended thresholds (root mean square error of approximation = 0.041, standardized root mean square residual = 0.057, comparative fit index = 0.998). All subscales demonstrated acceptable to strong internal consistency (á = 0.745-0.778; ů = 0.92). No significant floor or ceiling effects were found to compromise the scale's performance. All items showed positive item-total correlations and contributed meaningfully to their respective subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LGBTQ+ HCES is a valid, reliable and culturally grounded instrument for assessing healthcare experiences among LGBTQ+ populations in Poland. It holds promise for research, public health surveillance and health system quality improvement efforts to promote inclusive and equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1565-1574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/209762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer individuals frequently encounter disparities in healthcare access, quality and inclusivity. Despite growing awareness of these challenges, Poland has lacked a psychometrically validated tool to assess the experiences of sexual and gender minorities in clinical settings.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate the LGBTQ+ Healthcare Experiences Scale (LGBTQ+ HCES) tailored to the Polish context.

Material and methods: A multi-phase cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025. The initial pool of items was developed through a narrative literature review and refined by 4 researchers with clinical and academic experience in LGBTQ+ health. Content validity was assessed using a 2-round Delphi process involving a multidisciplinary panel of experts (n = 12), who rated item clarity and relevance using Aiken's V. A pilot test with 30 LGBTQ+ participants confirmed comprehension and technical usability. The final 15-item instrument, comprising 3 subscales (Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, Trust and Comfort), was administered to 172 LGBTQ+ individuals recruited via social media. Psychometric evaluation included descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's á, McDonald's ů).

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 3-factor model comprising Respect and Inclusivity, Discrimination and Microaggressions, and Trust and Comfort. Model fit indices met recommended thresholds (root mean square error of approximation = 0.041, standardized root mean square residual = 0.057, comparative fit index = 0.998). All subscales demonstrated acceptable to strong internal consistency (á = 0.745-0.778; ů = 0.92). No significant floor or ceiling effects were found to compromise the scale's performance. All items showed positive item-total correlations and contributed meaningfully to their respective subscales.

Conclusions: The LGBTQ+ HCES is a valid, reliable and culturally grounded instrument for assessing healthcare experiences among LGBTQ+ populations in Poland. It holds promise for research, public health surveillance and health system quality improvement efforts to promote inclusive and equitable care.

完善LGBTQ+医疗体验量表(LGBTQ+ HCES)的验证。
背景:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿群体经常在医疗保健获取、质量和包容性方面遇到差异。尽管越来越多的人意识到这些挑战,但波兰缺乏一种心理测量学上有效的工具来评估临床环境中性和性别少数群体的经历。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证适合波兰背景的LGBTQ+医疗体验量表(LGBTQ+ HCES)。材料与方法:于2025年进行了一项多阶段横断面研究。最初的项目库是由4名具有LGBTQ+健康临床和学术经验的研究人员通过叙述性文献综述开发的。内容效度评估采用两轮德尔菲法,由多学科专家小组(n = 12)组成,他们使用艾肯v量表对项目的清晰度和相关性进行评分。一项由30名LGBTQ+参与者参与的试点测试证实了理解和技术可用性。最后的15项量表包括3个子量表(尊重与包容、歧视与微侵犯、信任与舒适),通过社交媒体招募172名LGBTQ+个体。心理测量评估包括描述性分析、验证性因子分析(CFA)和信度检验(Cronbach's , McDonald's)。结果:验证性因子分析支持尊重与包容、歧视与微侵犯、信任与舒适的三因素模型。模型拟合指标满足推荐阈值(近似均方根误差= 0.041,标准化均方根残差= 0.057,比较拟合指数= 0.998)。所有子量表均表现出可接受的强内部一致性( = 0.745-0.778;没有发现显著的下限或上限效应会影响量表的性能。所有项目均表现出正相关,并对各自的子量表有显著贡献。结论:LGBTQ+ HCES是评估波兰LGBTQ+人群医疗体验的有效、可靠和基于文化的工具。它为研究、公共卫生监测和卫生系统质量改进工作带来了希望,以促进包容和公平的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信