Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient-centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Hector Guadalajara, Jose Luis Domínguez-Tristancho, Raquel Fuentes Mateo, Miguel Leon-Arellano, Raquel Sanz-Baro, Eleonora Geraldi, Ana Isabel Hormigo-Sanchez, Víctor Manuel Castellano Megías, Marta Pérez Cobos, Patricia Mellado Miras, Begoña Lopez-Botet Zulueta, Mariano Garcia-Arranz, Jesus García Foncillas, Cristina Caramés, Damián García-Olmo
{"title":"Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: The FOREST protocol, a patient-centered approach that clusters two cohorts with different outcomes.","authors":"Hector Guadalajara, Jose Luis Domínguez-Tristancho, Raquel Fuentes Mateo, Miguel Leon-Arellano, Raquel Sanz-Baro, Eleonora Geraldi, Ana Isabel Hormigo-Sanchez, Víctor Manuel Castellano Megías, Marta Pérez Cobos, Patricia Mellado Miras, Begoña Lopez-Botet Zulueta, Mariano Garcia-Arranz, Jesus García Foncillas, Cristina Caramés, Damián García-Olmo","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rectal cancer treatment has evolved toward individualized strategies that emphasize organ preservation and tailored therapeutic approaches. The FOREST protocol combines total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), early response evaluation, and prehabilitation within a comprehensive framework designed to optimize outcomes while minimizing overtreatment. In this single-center prospective study, 67 patients with rectal cancer (T1-T4, any N) were enrolled between April 2020 and December 2022. Treatment decisions-radical surgery (RS), watch and wait (WW), or local surgery (LS)-were guided by early and final response assessments. Outcomes were analyzed under an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with a median follow-up of 968 days (range: 440-2015). Final treatments included RS in 47.8% (n = 32), WW in 50.7% (n = 34), and LS in 1.5% (n = 1). Completion of TNT was achieved in 79.1% of patients. Organ preservation was accomplished in 44.8% (30/67 = 44.8%, with 34 WW and 1 LS). Systemic recurrence occurred in 22.4% of patients, surpassing the rate of local regrowth or persistence (17.9%). DFS in the WW group (65.7%) was comparable to that of the RS group (71.4%), while OS significantly favored WW (100% vs. 80.7%, p = .014). The FOREST protocol demonstrates that integrating TNT with response-guided strategies is feasible and can lead to high organ preservation rates and favorable oncologic outcomes. A key strength of the protocol is its ability to identify two distinct patient cohorts based on response evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rectal cancer treatment has evolved toward individualized strategies that emphasize organ preservation and tailored therapeutic approaches. The FOREST protocol combines total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), early response evaluation, and prehabilitation within a comprehensive framework designed to optimize outcomes while minimizing overtreatment. In this single-center prospective study, 67 patients with rectal cancer (T1-T4, any N) were enrolled between April 2020 and December 2022. Treatment decisions-radical surgery (RS), watch and wait (WW), or local surgery (LS)-were guided by early and final response assessments. Outcomes were analyzed under an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with a median follow-up of 968 days (range: 440-2015). Final treatments included RS in 47.8% (n = 32), WW in 50.7% (n = 34), and LS in 1.5% (n = 1). Completion of TNT was achieved in 79.1% of patients. Organ preservation was accomplished in 44.8% (30/67 = 44.8%, with 34 WW and 1 LS). Systemic recurrence occurred in 22.4% of patients, surpassing the rate of local regrowth or persistence (17.9%). DFS in the WW group (65.7%) was comparable to that of the RS group (71.4%), while OS significantly favored WW (100% vs. 80.7%, p = .014). The FOREST protocol demonstrates that integrating TNT with response-guided strategies is feasible and can lead to high organ preservation rates and favorable oncologic outcomes. A key strength of the protocol is its ability to identify two distinct patient cohorts based on response evaluation.

直肠癌的新辅助治疗:FOREST方案,一种以患者为中心的方法,聚集了两个具有不同结果的队列。
直肠癌的治疗已经向个性化的策略发展,强调器官保存和量身定制的治疗方法。FOREST方案将总新辅助治疗(TNT)、早期反应评估和康复结合在一个综合框架内,旨在优化结果,同时最大限度地减少过度治疗。在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,在2020年4月至2022年12月期间招募了67例直肠癌(T1-T4,任何N)患者。治疗决策——根治性手术(RS)、观察等待(WW)或局部手术(LS)——由早期和最终反应评估指导。在意向治疗(ITT)方法下分析结果,中位随访968天(范围:440-2015)。最终处理中,RS占47.8% (n = 32), WW占50.7% (n = 34), LS占1.5% (n = 1)。79.1%的患者完成了TNT治疗。器官保存率为44.8%(30/67 = 44.8%,其中WW 34例,LS 1例)。22.4%的患者出现全身复发,超过了局部再生或持续的比率(17.9%)。WW组的DFS(65.7%)与RS组(71.4%)相当,而OS明显有利于WW组(100% vs. 80.7%, p = 0.014)。FOREST方案表明,将TNT与反应导向策略相结合是可行的,可以导致高器官保存率和良好的肿瘤预后。该方案的一个关键优势是它能够根据反应评估确定两个不同的患者队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信