Early fawn-rearing habitat of mule deer in an agricultural landscape

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-09-14 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70403
R. A. Hellesto, L. A. Shipley, K. Huggler, M. DeVivo, P. E. Bennett
{"title":"Early fawn-rearing habitat of mule deer in an agricultural landscape","authors":"R. A. Hellesto,&nbsp;L. A. Shipley,&nbsp;K. Huggler,&nbsp;M. DeVivo,&nbsp;P. E. Bennett","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Survival from birth to recruitment into the adult population can greatly influence population dynamics of wild ungulates like mule deer. Fawn survival can respond to the quality of both food and cover, which can be modified by land-use practices, including agriculture and restoration of agricultural fields through the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). We examined habitat features that influenced (1) fawn-rearing habitat by maternal females (e.g., 3 days before to 3 weeks after parturition), and (2) bed-site selection by mule deer fawns within a nearly 6000-km<sup>2</sup> agricultural landscape dominated by winter wheat in southeastern Washington, USA. We estimated the parturition date of 57 maternal females from fawn searches and a machine-learning parturition model. We used the females' GPS location during early fawn rearing to create a Resource Selection Function, and land cover measurements of bed sites for 47 fawns between 0 and 12 days old. Within their summer home ranges, maternal females selected shrubs and trees, vegetation types that provided more vertical structure, followed by grassland, with agricultural land cover, especially fallow, as the lowest ranked land cover type. Intact (i.e., never plowed) shrubland and grassland were higher ranked than were shrublands and grasslands restored through CRP. Likewise, fawns selected bed sites with greater overhead canopy cover and horizontal cover, especially when provided by woody shrubs and trees. Although 27% of bed sites were in growing wheat, agriculture was the lowest ranked land cover type in terms of selection. Our research suggests that populations of mule deer in landscapes dominated by cereal grain agriculture would benefit by (1) increasing the prevalence of quality shrubs and trees where possible to improve cover for neonates, and (2) supporting cropland restoration programs like CRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70403","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survival from birth to recruitment into the adult population can greatly influence population dynamics of wild ungulates like mule deer. Fawn survival can respond to the quality of both food and cover, which can be modified by land-use practices, including agriculture and restoration of agricultural fields through the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). We examined habitat features that influenced (1) fawn-rearing habitat by maternal females (e.g., 3 days before to 3 weeks after parturition), and (2) bed-site selection by mule deer fawns within a nearly 6000-km2 agricultural landscape dominated by winter wheat in southeastern Washington, USA. We estimated the parturition date of 57 maternal females from fawn searches and a machine-learning parturition model. We used the females' GPS location during early fawn rearing to create a Resource Selection Function, and land cover measurements of bed sites for 47 fawns between 0 and 12 days old. Within their summer home ranges, maternal females selected shrubs and trees, vegetation types that provided more vertical structure, followed by grassland, with agricultural land cover, especially fallow, as the lowest ranked land cover type. Intact (i.e., never plowed) shrubland and grassland were higher ranked than were shrublands and grasslands restored through CRP. Likewise, fawns selected bed sites with greater overhead canopy cover and horizontal cover, especially when provided by woody shrubs and trees. Although 27% of bed sites were in growing wheat, agriculture was the lowest ranked land cover type in terms of selection. Our research suggests that populations of mule deer in landscapes dominated by cereal grain agriculture would benefit by (1) increasing the prevalence of quality shrubs and trees where possible to improve cover for neonates, and (2) supporting cropland restoration programs like CRP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

农业景观中骡鹿的早期小鹿饲养栖息地
从出生到进入成年种群的生存对野生有蹄类动物如骡鹿的种群动态有很大的影响。小鹿的生存可以对食物和覆盖物的质量做出反应,这可以通过土地利用实践来改变,包括农业和通过联邦保护储备计划(CRP)恢复农田。在美国华盛顿东南部近6000平方公里的以冬小麦为主的农业景观中,研究了影响母鹿饲养小鹿的栖息地特征(例如,分娩前3天至分娩后3周),以及(2)骡鹿小鹿的床址选择。我们通过小鹿搜索和机器学习分娩模型估计了57只母鹿的分娩日期。我们利用母鹿在小鹿饲养早期的GPS定位建立了一个资源选择函数,并测量了47只0 - 12日龄的小鹿的床址的土地覆盖。在它们的夏季家园范围内,母性雌性选择灌木和乔木,这些植被类型提供了更多的垂直结构,其次是草地,农业土地覆盖,尤其是休耕土地覆盖,是排名最低的土地覆盖类型。完整(即未耕过)的灌丛和草地的排名高于通过CRP恢复的灌丛和草地。同样地,小鹿选择有更大的头顶树冠和水平覆盖物的床地,特别是当有木本灌木和树木提供时。虽然27%的床地用于种植小麦,但就选择而言,农业是排名最低的土地覆盖类型。我们的研究表明,在以谷物农业为主的景观中,通过(1)增加优质灌木和树木的流行,可能改善新生儿的覆盖度,以及(2)支持CRP等农田恢复计划,骡鹿种群将受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信