Juliedy Waldow Kupske, Júlia de Mattos, Tainara Steffens, Eduarda Blanco-Rambo, Marcelo Bandeira-Guimarães, Mikel L. Sáez de Asteasu, Mikel Izquierdo, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Caroline Pietta-Dias
{"title":"Physical function versus cognitive status: Which better predicts independence in basic activities among long-lived cognitively preserved older adults","authors":"Juliedy Waldow Kupske, Júlia de Mattos, Tainara Steffens, Eduarda Blanco-Rambo, Marcelo Bandeira-Guimarães, Mikel L. Sáez de Asteasu, Mikel Izquierdo, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Caroline Pietta-Dias","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare physical function and cognitive status according to the level of dependence in basic activities of daily living (ADL) and to determine which of these variables better predict functional independence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study included 231 individuals over 90 years of age. Physical function was assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and handgrip strength (HGS), and cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A binary logistic regression adjusted for age was conducted to identify which variables related to physical performance or cognitive status could predict independence in basic ADL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results showed that the model including TUG (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.18–8.34) along with HGS (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.14–3.45) provided the best fit. This indicates that better performance on the TUG test increases the odds of independence by 4.3 times, and each increment in HGS doubles that chance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We conclude that older individuals with better physical function and greater muscle strength are more likely to be independent in ADL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to compare physical function and cognitive status according to the level of dependence in basic activities of daily living (ADL) and to determine which of these variables better predict functional independence.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 231 individuals over 90 years of age. Physical function was assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and handgrip strength (HGS), and cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A binary logistic regression adjusted for age was conducted to identify which variables related to physical performance or cognitive status could predict independence in basic ADL.
Results
The results showed that the model including TUG (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.18–8.34) along with HGS (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.14–3.45) provided the best fit. This indicates that better performance on the TUG test increases the odds of independence by 4.3 times, and each increment in HGS doubles that chance.
Conclusions
We conclude that older individuals with better physical function and greater muscle strength are more likely to be independent in ADL.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.