Carbon abatement costs and digital revolution: An empirical analysis of manufacturing industry

IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Changxin Yu, Yuening Wang, Tomas Baležentis, Xue-Li Chen
{"title":"Carbon abatement costs and digital revolution: An empirical analysis of manufacturing industry","authors":"Changxin Yu,&nbsp;Yuening Wang,&nbsp;Tomas Baležentis,&nbsp;Xue-Li Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10373-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines China’s carbon abatement costs and the role of digital technology, using provincial panel data from 2000 to 2021. By distinguishing between clean and non-clean energy inputs, we find that the estimated carbon abatement cost significantly exceeds prevailing market trading prices and follows a U-shaped temporal pattern—declining initially and then rising steadily. Our analysis shows that digital technology positively influences carbon abatement costs, primarily through improvements in energy efficiency. This effect varies regionally, with the strongest impacts observed in Central China—an unexpected finding given the conventional emphasis on coastal regions. These insights have important policy implications: (1) carbon pricing mechanisms should be reformed to more accurately reflect the true social cost of emissions; (2) the adoption of clean energy must be accelerated to reduce disparities in abatement costs; and (3) targeted digital investments, particularly in inland provinces, can enhance the effectiveness of emissions reduction strategies. By integrating energy-source differentiation with the dynamics of digital transformation, this study offers a more refined framework for evaluating carbon abatement costs and highlights the need for regionally tailored policies to achieve China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-025-10373-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines China’s carbon abatement costs and the role of digital technology, using provincial panel data from 2000 to 2021. By distinguishing between clean and non-clean energy inputs, we find that the estimated carbon abatement cost significantly exceeds prevailing market trading prices and follows a U-shaped temporal pattern—declining initially and then rising steadily. Our analysis shows that digital technology positively influences carbon abatement costs, primarily through improvements in energy efficiency. This effect varies regionally, with the strongest impacts observed in Central China—an unexpected finding given the conventional emphasis on coastal regions. These insights have important policy implications: (1) carbon pricing mechanisms should be reformed to more accurately reflect the true social cost of emissions; (2) the adoption of clean energy must be accelerated to reduce disparities in abatement costs; and (3) targeted digital investments, particularly in inland provinces, can enhance the effectiveness of emissions reduction strategies. By integrating energy-source differentiation with the dynamics of digital transformation, this study offers a more refined framework for evaluating carbon abatement costs and highlights the need for regionally tailored policies to achieve China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal.

碳减排成本与数字革命:基于制造业的实证分析
本研究利用2000年至2021年的省级面板数据,考察了中国的碳减排成本和数字技术的作用。通过对清洁能源和非清洁能源投入的区分,我们发现碳减排成本的估算值明显超过现行市场交易价格,并遵循先下降后稳步上升的u型时间模式。我们的分析表明,数字技术主要通过提高能源效率对碳减排成本产生积极影响。这种影响因地区而异,在中国中部观察到的影响最大——这是一个意想不到的发现,因为传统的重点是沿海地区。这些见解具有重要的政策意义:(1)碳定价机制应进行改革,以更准确地反映排放的真实社会成本;(2)必须加快采用清洁能源,以缩小减排成本的差异;(3)有针对性的数字投资,特别是在内陆省份,可以提高减排战略的有效性。通过整合能源差异与数字化转型的动态,本研究提供了一个更精细的碳减排成本评估框架,并强调了实现中国2060年碳中和目标的区域定制政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信