A Proxy ADC Framework for Side-Channel Secure ADC Analysis

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Andrew Ash;John Hu
{"title":"A Proxy ADC Framework for Side-Channel Secure ADC Analysis","authors":"Andrew Ash;John Hu","doi":"10.1109/OJCAS.2025.3602353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the rapidly evolving world of hardware security, developing metrics for evaluating the security improvements of hardware designs is important. This work examines the prevailing threat model for secure analog-to-digital converter (ADC) architectures and explains how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and bit-wise accuracy (BWA) are used to evaluate security improvements. The existing metrics are mathematically related through the proposed Proxy ADC framework. The proposed SNR-RMSE and BWA-RMSE relationships are validated using a power side-channel attack on a commercial ADC. The SNR-RMSE relationship achieves an average percent error of 1.69% across four trials, while the BWA-RMSE relationship achieves an average of 7.97%. Using results from past secure ADC works allows for additional demonstrations of the relationships. These relationships can estimate accuracy in a realistic attack scenario where ADC outputs cannot be measured to verify the evaluation, and recontextualize the metrics of standard ADC design for hardware security. Furthermore, the Proxy ADC framework allows for comparison of tradeoffs between designs’ security and efficiency, revealing trends to leverage for future secure architectures.","PeriodicalId":93442,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of circuits and systems","volume":"6 ","pages":"401-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11138015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of circuits and systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11138015/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving world of hardware security, developing metrics for evaluating the security improvements of hardware designs is important. This work examines the prevailing threat model for secure analog-to-digital converter (ADC) architectures and explains how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and bit-wise accuracy (BWA) are used to evaluate security improvements. The existing metrics are mathematically related through the proposed Proxy ADC framework. The proposed SNR-RMSE and BWA-RMSE relationships are validated using a power side-channel attack on a commercial ADC. The SNR-RMSE relationship achieves an average percent error of 1.69% across four trials, while the BWA-RMSE relationship achieves an average of 7.97%. Using results from past secure ADC works allows for additional demonstrations of the relationships. These relationships can estimate accuracy in a realistic attack scenario where ADC outputs cannot be measured to verify the evaluation, and recontextualize the metrics of standard ADC design for hardware security. Furthermore, the Proxy ADC framework allows for comparison of tradeoffs between designs’ security and efficiency, revealing trends to leverage for future secure architectures.
一种用于侧信道安全ADC分析的代理ADC框架
在快速发展的硬件安全领域,开发用于评估硬件设计的安全性改进的度量非常重要。这项工作检查了安全模数转换器(ADC)架构的流行威胁模型,并解释了如何使用信噪比(SNR),均方根误差(RMSE)和比特精度(BWA)来评估安全性改进。现有指标通过提议的代理ADC框架在数学上相关。提出的SNR-RMSE和BWA-RMSE关系在商用ADC上使用功率侧信道攻击进行验证。SNR-RMSE关系在四次试验中平均误差为1.69%,而BWA-RMSE关系平均误差为7.97%。使用过去安全ADC工作的结果可以进一步演示这些关系。这些关系可以在无法测量ADC输出以验证评估的现实攻击场景中估计准确性,并重新定义标准ADC设计的硬件安全指标。此外,Proxy ADC框架允许比较设计的安全性和效率之间的权衡,揭示未来安全架构的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信