Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from the calf environment on Swiss dairy farms

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Véronique Bernier Gosselin , Vincent Perreten , Alexandra Collaud , Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula , Mireille Meylan
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from the calf environment on Swiss dairy farms","authors":"Véronique Bernier Gosselin ,&nbsp;Vincent Perreten ,&nbsp;Alexandra Collaud ,&nbsp;Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula ,&nbsp;Mireille Meylan","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the intestinal commensal flora of dairy calves is acquired during the first weeks of life. It has been hypothesized that one of the sources of colonization for such bacterial strains is the calf environment, whereas antimicrobial exposure of the calves plays a role in the selection and maintenance of AMR in the flora. The objectives of this cross-sectional observational study were to explore the associations between AMR and multidrug resistance (MDR; resistance to ≥ 3 drug classes) of <em>Escherichia coli</em> isolated from calves' pens and herd-level factors including quantitative antimicrobial use (AMU) on 60 Swiss dairy farms. Two swabs of calf pens' walls were collected on each farm, and two <em>E. coli</em> isolates from each swab were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by broth microdilution. Among 240 isolates, the proportion showing no AMR was 57.9 %. The proportion of MDR isolates was 31.3 % and at least one MDR isolate was found on 50 % of the farms. Higher odds of AMR were associated with a producer-estimated incidence of calf pneumonia &gt; 10 % (OR 17.3, 95 % CI 2.5–118.4). The introduction of cattle from ≥ 2 farms during the previous year was associated with increased odds of MDR (OR 12.3, 95 % CI 2.0–75.7). Multidrug-resistant <em>E. coli</em> were common in the calf environment on Swiss dairy farms. Our results suggest that in addition to antimicrobial stewardship, farm management factors including biosecurity practices should be considered in the investigation and prevention of the spread of AMR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825003674","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the intestinal commensal flora of dairy calves is acquired during the first weeks of life. It has been hypothesized that one of the sources of colonization for such bacterial strains is the calf environment, whereas antimicrobial exposure of the calves plays a role in the selection and maintenance of AMR in the flora. The objectives of this cross-sectional observational study were to explore the associations between AMR and multidrug resistance (MDR; resistance to ≥ 3 drug classes) of Escherichia coli isolated from calves' pens and herd-level factors including quantitative antimicrobial use (AMU) on 60 Swiss dairy farms. Two swabs of calf pens' walls were collected on each farm, and two E. coli isolates from each swab were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by broth microdilution. Among 240 isolates, the proportion showing no AMR was 57.9 %. The proportion of MDR isolates was 31.3 % and at least one MDR isolate was found on 50 % of the farms. Higher odds of AMR were associated with a producer-estimated incidence of calf pneumonia > 10 % (OR 17.3, 95 % CI 2.5–118.4). The introduction of cattle from ≥ 2 farms during the previous year was associated with increased odds of MDR (OR 12.3, 95 % CI 2.0–75.7). Multidrug-resistant E. coli were common in the calf environment on Swiss dairy farms. Our results suggest that in addition to antimicrobial stewardship, farm management factors including biosecurity practices should be considered in the investigation and prevention of the spread of AMR.
瑞士奶牛场犊牛环境中分离的大肠杆菌的抗菌素耐药性
乳牛肠道共生菌群中的抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是在出生后的最初几周内获得的。据推测,这些菌株的定植来源之一是犊牛环境,而犊牛的抗微生物暴露在菌群中起着选择和维持AMR的作用。本横断面观察性研究的目的是探讨从瑞士60个奶牛场分离的犊牛栏中分离的大肠杆菌的AMR与多药耐药(MDR;对≥3种药物类别的耐药)之间的关系,以及包括定量抗菌药物使用(AMU)在内的畜群水平因素。在每个养殖场收集犊牛栏壁的2个拭子,并通过肉汤微量稀释对每个拭子中分离的2个大肠杆菌进行抗菌敏感性试验。240株中无AMR的比例为57.9%。MDR分离株的比例为31.3%,50%的养殖场至少发现一株MDR分离株。较高的AMR发生率与生产者估计的小牛肺炎发生率(10%)相关(OR 17.3, 95% CI 2.5-118.4)。前一年从2个以上农场引进的牛与耐多药发生率增加相关(OR 12.3, 95% CI 2.0-75.7)。耐多药大肠杆菌在瑞士奶牛场的小牛环境中很常见。我们的研究结果表明,在调查和预防AMR的传播时,除了抗菌素管理外,还应考虑包括生物安全措施在内的农场管理因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信