The glorification of greed beyond the business school: how popular wall street narratives relate to future work selves

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Inge M. Brokerhof , Omar N. Solinger , P. Matthijs Bal , P.G.W. Jansen
{"title":"The glorification of greed beyond the business school: how popular wall street narratives relate to future work selves","authors":"Inge M. Brokerhof ,&nbsp;Omar N. Solinger ,&nbsp;P. Matthijs Bal ,&nbsp;P.G.W. Jansen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Popular Wall Street narratives, such as <em>The Wolf of Wall Street</em>, have become large box-office successes, reaching wide audiences. In three exploratory mixed-method experiments, this study investigates how popular Wall Street narratives relate to students’ and sales employees’ future work selves – who they aspire to become in their future career. The findings indicate that characters in narratives glorifying greed are considered more desired future work selves in comparison to characters in critical or non-greed narratives. Morally ambiguous greedy characters were perceived through a “winner frame” of self-made success, and were associated with lower empathy levels, while narratives from a “victim perspective” – with characters suffering as a result of financial malpractice – were associated with higher empathy levels. This empirical study contributes to theory and practice on the appeal of greedy characters and how stories could perpetuate a culture of greed and dominant logic of shareholder-value maximization in Wall Street.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115680"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500503X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popular Wall Street narratives, such as The Wolf of Wall Street, have become large box-office successes, reaching wide audiences. In three exploratory mixed-method experiments, this study investigates how popular Wall Street narratives relate to students’ and sales employees’ future work selves – who they aspire to become in their future career. The findings indicate that characters in narratives glorifying greed are considered more desired future work selves in comparison to characters in critical or non-greed narratives. Morally ambiguous greedy characters were perceived through a “winner frame” of self-made success, and were associated with lower empathy levels, while narratives from a “victim perspective” – with characters suffering as a result of financial malpractice – were associated with higher empathy levels. This empirical study contributes to theory and practice on the appeal of greedy characters and how stories could perpetuate a culture of greed and dominant logic of shareholder-value maximization in Wall Street.
超越商学院对贪婪的美化:华尔街流行的叙事如何与未来的工作自我联系起来
流行的华尔街故事,如《华尔街之狼》,获得了巨大的票房成功,吸引了广泛的观众。在三个探索性混合方法实验中,本研究调查了流行的华尔街叙事与学生和销售人员未来工作自我的关系-他们希望在未来的职业生涯中成为什么样的人。研究结果表明,与批评或非贪婪叙事中的角色相比,美化贪婪叙事中的角色被认为是更理想的未来工作自我。道德上模棱两可的贪婪角色是通过白手起家的“赢家框架”来感知的,与较低的同理心水平相关,而从“受害者角度”叙事——角色因金融欺诈而受苦——与较高的同理心水平相关。这一实证研究有助于研究贪婪角色的吸引力以及故事如何使华尔街的贪婪文化和股东价值最大化的主导逻辑永久化的理论和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信