{"title":"Enhancing ESG practices in supply chain operations through information disclosure: The “ETHICS” Framework","authors":"Yifan Cao , Bin Shen , Siqin Tana","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices are essential to modern supply chain operations. Indeed, the legal and ethical requirements for disclosing ESG information are the subject of much debate. However, the literature is scattered and does not provide a consolidated view of “What–to Whom–When” to disclose. This motivates us to conduct a systematic review of the literature to explore the current state-of-the-art literature on sustainable and responsible information disclosure in supply chains. Based on this review, we synthesize effective strategies and propose the <em>ETHICS</em> framework (i.e., Elimination of ESG-washing, Technology-enabled communication, Holistic multi-tier view, Industry collaboration, Customization of standardized frameworks, and Synthesis of ESG metrics). The <em>ETHICS</em> framework helps manage, report, and improve ESG performance in supply chains through ESG information disclosure. We also identify five key directions for future research: (1) assessing and quantifying social information before disclosure, (2) collecting and disclosing social information in real time, (3) optimizing the timing of information flows from indirect suppliers, (4) managing social responsibility in supply chain partnerships, and (5) understanding buyers’ roles as information recipients versus senders. Our paper provides important insights into ESG information disclosure in supply chains for academics and practitioners from an operational perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115668"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices are essential to modern supply chain operations. Indeed, the legal and ethical requirements for disclosing ESG information are the subject of much debate. However, the literature is scattered and does not provide a consolidated view of “What–to Whom–When” to disclose. This motivates us to conduct a systematic review of the literature to explore the current state-of-the-art literature on sustainable and responsible information disclosure in supply chains. Based on this review, we synthesize effective strategies and propose the ETHICS framework (i.e., Elimination of ESG-washing, Technology-enabled communication, Holistic multi-tier view, Industry collaboration, Customization of standardized frameworks, and Synthesis of ESG metrics). The ETHICS framework helps manage, report, and improve ESG performance in supply chains through ESG information disclosure. We also identify five key directions for future research: (1) assessing and quantifying social information before disclosure, (2) collecting and disclosing social information in real time, (3) optimizing the timing of information flows from indirect suppliers, (4) managing social responsibility in supply chain partnerships, and (5) understanding buyers’ roles as information recipients versus senders. Our paper provides important insights into ESG information disclosure in supply chains for academics and practitioners from an operational perspective.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.