Modelling the impact of lower speed limits on residential streets for cyclist level of traffic stress and car travel time in Greater Melbourne

Afshin Jafari , Steve Pemberton , Sapan Tiwari , Tayebeh Saghapour , Nikhil Chand , Belen Zapata-Diomedi , Billie Giles-Corti
{"title":"Modelling the impact of lower speed limits on residential streets for cyclist level of traffic stress and car travel time in Greater Melbourne","authors":"Afshin Jafari ,&nbsp;Steve Pemberton ,&nbsp;Sapan Tiwari ,&nbsp;Tayebeh Saghapour ,&nbsp;Nikhil Chand ,&nbsp;Belen Zapata-Diomedi ,&nbsp;Billie Giles-Corti","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing speed limits to create safer, lower-stress environments for cyclists is a widely proposed policy but often faces resistance due to concerns about increased travel times. This study evaluates these concerns by assessing Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) under existing speed limits (base scenario) and the effects of reducing residential street speed limits to 40 km/h and 30 km/h (alternative scenarios) on cycling LTS and car travel time.</div><div>LTS is a widely used measure of cycling stress, categorising road segments from LTS-1 (least stressful) to LTS-4 (most stressful). We assigned LTS values to all road segments in Greater Melbourne based on cycling infrastructure, road hierarchy, traffic volume, and speed limits from OpenStreetMap. Trips from a government travel survey were then routed through the network to estimate exposure to different LTS levels under base and alternative scenarios. Additionally, a mode choice model was developed to examine the impact of LTS exposure on cycling likelihood. Finally, an agent-based transport model was used to evaluate the impact of this intervention on car travel time.</div><div>Results showed significant reductions in high-LTS exposure with lower speed limits. Under the base case, 27.9% of routes were on LTS-1 roads, and at 30 km/h this increased to 63.3%. Mode choice model results confirmed a strong negative correlation between cycling likelihood and high-LTS exposure. Car travel time impacts were minimal, even for trips largely on residential streets the average was only one minute.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105925000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing speed limits to create safer, lower-stress environments for cyclists is a widely proposed policy but often faces resistance due to concerns about increased travel times. This study evaluates these concerns by assessing Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) under existing speed limits (base scenario) and the effects of reducing residential street speed limits to 40 km/h and 30 km/h (alternative scenarios) on cycling LTS and car travel time.
LTS is a widely used measure of cycling stress, categorising road segments from LTS-1 (least stressful) to LTS-4 (most stressful). We assigned LTS values to all road segments in Greater Melbourne based on cycling infrastructure, road hierarchy, traffic volume, and speed limits from OpenStreetMap. Trips from a government travel survey were then routed through the network to estimate exposure to different LTS levels under base and alternative scenarios. Additionally, a mode choice model was developed to examine the impact of LTS exposure on cycling likelihood. Finally, an agent-based transport model was used to evaluate the impact of this intervention on car travel time.
Results showed significant reductions in high-LTS exposure with lower speed limits. Under the base case, 27.9% of routes were on LTS-1 roads, and at 30 km/h this increased to 63.3%. Mode choice model results confirmed a strong negative correlation between cycling likelihood and high-LTS exposure. Car travel time impacts were minimal, even for trips largely on residential streets the average was only one minute.
模拟大墨尔本居民区街道上较低的速度限制对骑自行车者交通压力水平和汽车旅行时间的影响
降低车速限制,为骑自行车的人创造更安全、压力更小的环境,是一项被广泛提出的政策,但由于担心会增加出行时间,这一政策经常遭到抵制。本研究通过评估现有限速(基本情景)下的交通压力水平(LTS),以及将住宅街道限速降低至40公里/小时和30公里/小时(替代情景)对骑行LTS和汽车旅行时间的影响,来评估这些担忧。LTS是一种广泛使用的骑行压力测量方法,它将道路分段从LTS-1(压力最小)到LTS-4(压力最大)分类。我们根据OpenStreetMap的自行车基础设施、道路等级、交通量和速度限制,为大墨尔本的所有路段分配了LTS值。然后,从政府旅行调查中得出的行程通过网络进行路由,以估计在基本和替代方案下暴露于不同LTS水平的情况。此外,我们还建立了一种模式选择模型来检验LTS暴露对循环可能性的影响。最后,利用一个基于agent的交通模型来评估这种干预对汽车出行时间的影响。结果显示,较低的速度限制显著减少了高lts暴露。在基本情况下,27.9%的路线在LTS-1道路上,而在30公里/小时的情况下,这一比例增加到63.3%。模式选择模型结果证实了循环可能性与高lts暴露之间的强烈负相关。汽车出行时间的影响很小,即使是在居民区的街道上,平均也只有一分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信