Relative deprivation and subsequent health, happiness, and human flourishing: A longitudinal outcome-wide analysis

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chun-Tung Kuo , Shu-Hui Hsieh , Pei-Shan Liao , Ichiro Kawachi
{"title":"Relative deprivation and subsequent health, happiness, and human flourishing: A longitudinal outcome-wide analysis","authors":"Chun-Tung Kuo ,&nbsp;Shu-Hui Hsieh ,&nbsp;Pei-Shan Liao ,&nbsp;Ichiro Kawachi","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Relative deprivation induced by unfavorable social comparisons due to income disparity has been linked to adverse health outcomes. However, its association with broader aspects of human flourishing has not been well established. Furthermore, most prior studies rely on cross-sectional data, limiting causal interpretation and raising concerns about reverse causality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used three waves of longitudinal panel data (2022, 2023, and 2024) from the adult population in Taiwan (<em>N</em> = 3413) to examine how relative deprivation, measured by the Yitzhaki Index, was associated with various subsequent health, happiness, and human flourishing outcomes. We applied an outcome-wide analytic approach, adjusting for pre-baseline covariates and exposure levels, as well as prior outcome values when available. Sensitivity analyses included the calculation of <em>E</em>-values and robustness checks using alternative reference group definitions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Relative deprivation was negatively associated with 15 out of 16 outcomes across multiple domains of human flourishing, including lower levels of general and mental health, happiness, life satisfaction, and measures related to meaning and purpose, character and virtue, social relationships, and financial stability. Among all outcomes, life satisfaction, job satisfaction, and financial-related outcomes exhibited more pronounced associations with relative deprivation. In contrast, no association was observed between relative deprivation and loneliness. <em>E</em>-values ranging from 1.35 to 1.74 suggested moderate robustness to unmeasured confounding. Findings were consistent across alternative definitions for constructing relative deprivation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that exposure to relative deprivation is a critical psychosocial stressor that compromises health and undermines multiple dimensions of well-being and human flourishing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118537"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Relative deprivation induced by unfavorable social comparisons due to income disparity has been linked to adverse health outcomes. However, its association with broader aspects of human flourishing has not been well established. Furthermore, most prior studies rely on cross-sectional data, limiting causal interpretation and raising concerns about reverse causality.

Methods

We used three waves of longitudinal panel data (2022, 2023, and 2024) from the adult population in Taiwan (N = 3413) to examine how relative deprivation, measured by the Yitzhaki Index, was associated with various subsequent health, happiness, and human flourishing outcomes. We applied an outcome-wide analytic approach, adjusting for pre-baseline covariates and exposure levels, as well as prior outcome values when available. Sensitivity analyses included the calculation of E-values and robustness checks using alternative reference group definitions.

Results

Relative deprivation was negatively associated with 15 out of 16 outcomes across multiple domains of human flourishing, including lower levels of general and mental health, happiness, life satisfaction, and measures related to meaning and purpose, character and virtue, social relationships, and financial stability. Among all outcomes, life satisfaction, job satisfaction, and financial-related outcomes exhibited more pronounced associations with relative deprivation. In contrast, no association was observed between relative deprivation and loneliness. E-values ranging from 1.35 to 1.74 suggested moderate robustness to unmeasured confounding. Findings were consistent across alternative definitions for constructing relative deprivation.

Conclusion

This study suggests that exposure to relative deprivation is a critical psychosocial stressor that compromises health and undermines multiple dimensions of well-being and human flourishing.
相对剥夺与随后的健康、幸福和人类繁荣:一项纵向结果分析
由于收入差距造成的不利社会比较导致的相对剥夺与不利的健康结果有关。然而,它与人类繁荣的更广泛方面的联系尚未得到很好的确立。此外,大多数先前的研究依赖于横断面数据,限制了因果解释并引起了对反向因果关系的担忧。方法我们使用来自台湾成年人口(N = 3413)的三波纵向面板数据(2022年、2023年和2024年)来检验以伊扎克指数衡量的相对剥夺与随后的各种健康、幸福和人类繁荣结果之间的关系。我们采用结果范围分析方法,调整基线前协变量和暴露水平,以及可用的先前结果值。敏感性分析包括计算e值和使用替代参考组定义进行稳健性检查。结果:在人类繁荣的多个领域中,相对剥夺与16项结果中的15项呈负相关,包括一般和心理健康、幸福感、生活满意度水平较低,以及与意义和目的、性格和美德、社会关系和经济稳定相关的指标。在所有结果中,生活满意度、工作满意度和财务相关结果与相对剥夺的关联更为明显。相比之下,没有观察到相对剥夺和孤独之间的联系。e值在1.35至1.74之间,表明对未测量的混杂具有中等稳健性。研究结果在构建相对剥夺的不同定义中是一致的。本研究表明,暴露于相对剥夺是一种关键的社会心理压力源,会损害健康,破坏福祉和人类繁荣的多个维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信