{"title":"A three-dimensional coupling evaluation model for carbon source-sink in riparian zones","authors":"Na Li, Juan Peng, Feng Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Riparian zones, with high carbon sequestration capacity, play a critical role in watershed carbon cycles. Current riparian carbon sink assessments primarily focus on drawdown zones or only consider riparian ecological process, neglecting hydrological process. The objective of this study is to develop a three-dimensional coupling evaluation model for riparian carbon source-sink integrating ecological and hydrological processes, which include vertical, lateral, and longitudinal dimensions. (i) Vertical carbon source-sink: carbon release via respiration and carbon sequestration via photosynthesis. (ii) Lateral carbon source-sink: carbon loss via slope runoff erosion and carbon interception through soil conservation. (iii) Longitudinal carbon source-sink: carbon depletion by riverbank scouring of runoff and carbon sequestration by fluvial sediment deposition. Applied to the Fuhe River, the results show that: (i) The riparian zone of Fuhe River is a net carbon sink (593.0 t·a<sup>-1</sup>), with an economic value of 25,410.1 CNY. Vertical carbon process is a net carbon sink (5,657.0 t·a<sup>-1</sup>), while the lateral and longitudinal processes act as net carbon source (2,607.0 and 2,457.0 t·a<sup>-1</sup>, respectively). (ii) By riparian zone sections, the water-level fluctuation zone acts as a net carbon source (3,680.3 t·a<sup>-1</sup>), while the riverbank zone functions as a net carbon sink (4,273.3 t·a<sup>-1</sup>). (iii) Spatially, the upstream and midstream are net carbon sinks (513.04 and 234.35 t·a<sup>-1</sup>, respectively), while the downstream is a net carbon source (154.41 t·a<sup>-1</sup>). (iv) Enhancing vegetation coverage to boost photosynthetic capacity is key to increase carbon sink, and strengthening soil conservation measures to cut organic carbon loss from soil erosion is crucial for reducing carbon source.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942501594X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Riparian zones, with high carbon sequestration capacity, play a critical role in watershed carbon cycles. Current riparian carbon sink assessments primarily focus on drawdown zones or only consider riparian ecological process, neglecting hydrological process. The objective of this study is to develop a three-dimensional coupling evaluation model for riparian carbon source-sink integrating ecological and hydrological processes, which include vertical, lateral, and longitudinal dimensions. (i) Vertical carbon source-sink: carbon release via respiration and carbon sequestration via photosynthesis. (ii) Lateral carbon source-sink: carbon loss via slope runoff erosion and carbon interception through soil conservation. (iii) Longitudinal carbon source-sink: carbon depletion by riverbank scouring of runoff and carbon sequestration by fluvial sediment deposition. Applied to the Fuhe River, the results show that: (i) The riparian zone of Fuhe River is a net carbon sink (593.0 t·a-1), with an economic value of 25,410.1 CNY. Vertical carbon process is a net carbon sink (5,657.0 t·a-1), while the lateral and longitudinal processes act as net carbon source (2,607.0 and 2,457.0 t·a-1, respectively). (ii) By riparian zone sections, the water-level fluctuation zone acts as a net carbon source (3,680.3 t·a-1), while the riverbank zone functions as a net carbon sink (4,273.3 t·a-1). (iii) Spatially, the upstream and midstream are net carbon sinks (513.04 and 234.35 t·a-1, respectively), while the downstream is a net carbon source (154.41 t·a-1). (iv) Enhancing vegetation coverage to boost photosynthetic capacity is key to increase carbon sink, and strengthening soil conservation measures to cut organic carbon loss from soil erosion is crucial for reducing carbon source.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.