Disability Weights for Global Burden Estimation of Orofacial Pain.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A Lövgren,P Liv,J Durham,D A G Goncalves,F P Kapos,S F Kothari,M Drangsholt,C C Peck,C M Visscher,L Ong,P Svensson
{"title":"Disability Weights for Global Burden Estimation of Orofacial Pain.","authors":"A Lövgren,P Liv,J Durham,D A G Goncalves,F P Kapos,S F Kothari,M Drangsholt,C C Peck,C M Visscher,L Ong,P Svensson","doi":"10.1177/00220345251363852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global burden of orofacial pain (OFP), including temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), has never been estimated due to lacking disability weights (DWs). This is a significant limitation in the World Health Organization's goals for oral health. The present study presents DWs with directions for the development of corresponding health state descriptions. We used general population data on OFP and TMD (n > 180,000) with linked data on health-related quality of life from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; n > 110,000). From the SF-36 sum scores, a cumulative DW was mapped, and condition-specific DWs adjusted for common risk factors were calculated. Pain disability and related self-reported clinical characteristics were presented descriptively in a subsample of 300 individuals. In the study sample (n = 26,253, 49.9% women), participants with OFP reported significantly lower scores on the mental and physical components of the SF-36 when compared with pain-free individuals (P < 0.001), as did individuals with TMD as compared with those without TMD (P < 0.001). After adjusting for the presence of common health states, the mean DW was 0.024 (95% CI, 0.011 to 0.038) for OFP and 0.026 (95% CI, 0.016 to 0.038) for TMD. Individuals with higher pain disability reported higher pain intensity as well as increased pain catastrophizing and functional jaw limitations. Our findings demonstrate a feasible solution for estimating DW for OFP and TMD as an important step toward incorporation of these conditions into the Global Burden of Disease study and suggest a greater impact of pain than other common oral diseases. Further efforts are needed to develop lay descriptions and validate DW findings in other populations.","PeriodicalId":15596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research","volume":"313 1","pages":"220345251363852"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345251363852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global burden of orofacial pain (OFP), including temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), has never been estimated due to lacking disability weights (DWs). This is a significant limitation in the World Health Organization's goals for oral health. The present study presents DWs with directions for the development of corresponding health state descriptions. We used general population data on OFP and TMD (n > 180,000) with linked data on health-related quality of life from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; n > 110,000). From the SF-36 sum scores, a cumulative DW was mapped, and condition-specific DWs adjusted for common risk factors were calculated. Pain disability and related self-reported clinical characteristics were presented descriptively in a subsample of 300 individuals. In the study sample (n = 26,253, 49.9% women), participants with OFP reported significantly lower scores on the mental and physical components of the SF-36 when compared with pain-free individuals (P < 0.001), as did individuals with TMD as compared with those without TMD (P < 0.001). After adjusting for the presence of common health states, the mean DW was 0.024 (95% CI, 0.011 to 0.038) for OFP and 0.026 (95% CI, 0.016 to 0.038) for TMD. Individuals with higher pain disability reported higher pain intensity as well as increased pain catastrophizing and functional jaw limitations. Our findings demonstrate a feasible solution for estimating DW for OFP and TMD as an important step toward incorporation of these conditions into the Global Burden of Disease study and suggest a greater impact of pain than other common oral diseases. Further efforts are needed to develop lay descriptions and validate DW findings in other populations.
残障权在口腔面部疼痛整体负担评估中的应用。
由于缺乏残疾权重(DWs),全球口腔面部疼痛(OFP)负担,包括颞下颌疾病(TMDs),从未被估计过。这对世界卫生组织的口腔健康目标来说是一个重大的限制。本研究提出了DWs,并为相应健康状态描述的发展指明了方向。我们使用了OFP和TMD的一般人群数据(n >8万)以及来自简短健康调查(SF-36; n >1万)的与健康相关的生活质量相关数据。从SF-36的总得分中,绘制了累积的DW,并计算了根据常见危险因素调整的特定疾病的DW。在300个个体的子样本中描述性地呈现了疼痛残疾和相关的自我报告的临床特征。在研究样本中(n = 26253, 49.9%为女性),与无痛个体相比,OFP参与者在SF-36的精神和身体部分的得分明显较低(P < 0.001),患有TMD的个体与没有TMD的个体相比得分明显较低(P < 0.001)。在调整了常见健康状态的存在后,OFP的平均DW为0.024 (95% CI, 0.011至0.038),TMD的平均DW为0.026 (95% CI, 0.016至0.038)。疼痛残疾程度较高的个体报告了更高的疼痛强度,以及增加的疼痛灾难和功能性颌骨限制。我们的研究结果为估计OFP和TMD的DW提供了一个可行的解决方案,这是将这些疾病纳入全球疾病负担研究的重要一步,并表明疼痛比其他常见口腔疾病的影响更大。需要进一步的努力来制定详细的描述和验证DW在其他人群中的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Research
Journal of Dental Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal committed to sharing new knowledge and information on all sciences related to dentistry and the oral cavity, covering health and disease. With monthly publications, JDR ensures timely communication of the latest research to the oral and dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信