Forms of Psychological Bias Against Transgender Women and Men and People With Nonbinary Gender Identities.

IF 10.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sara Emily Burke,Alexandria Jaurique,Benjamin M Valen,Natalie M Wittlin,Mackenzie L McDonald,Marianne LaFrance
{"title":"Forms of Psychological Bias Against Transgender Women and Men and People With Nonbinary Gender Identities.","authors":"Sara Emily Burke,Alexandria Jaurique,Benjamin M Valen,Natalie M Wittlin,Mackenzie L McDonald,Marianne LaFrance","doi":"10.1177/10888683251360469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic AbstractThe present review examines bias against transgender women and men and bias against people with nonbinary gender identities. A central contention is that many people hold false beliefs about transgender men's and women's membership in the categories \"male\" and \"female,\" and, separately, view nonbinary gender identities themselves as illegitimate. Both discounting transgender men's and women's membership in the categories \"male\" and \"female\" and discounting the validity of nonbinary gender identities are forms of bias, and studying them will be essential to build a more nuanced understanding of stereotyping and prejudice. The authors review the literature on bias against transgender people and bias against nonbinary people, discuss the methodological and theoretical challenges in studying these biases, propose an approach for interpreting results in light of common (mis)categorization processes, and consider avenues for future research.Public AbstractThis article reviews research about bias against transgender women and men and bias against people with nonbinary gender identities. Many people hold false beliefs about transgender men's and women's membership in the categories \"male\" and \"female.\" Also, many people view nonbinary gender identities as illegitimate. Both discounting transgender men's and women's membership in the categories \"male\" and \"female\" and discounting the validity of nonbinary gender identities are forms of bias. Thoroughly investigating these forms of bias will help researchers build a more a nuanced understanding of the biases that target transgender and nonbinary people. This observation helps put much of the past research in context, and it could make future research stronger by distinguishing between kinds of bias and encouraging more precise measurement and experimentation.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"311 1","pages":"10888683251360469"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683251360469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic AbstractThe present review examines bias against transgender women and men and bias against people with nonbinary gender identities. A central contention is that many people hold false beliefs about transgender men's and women's membership in the categories "male" and "female," and, separately, view nonbinary gender identities themselves as illegitimate. Both discounting transgender men's and women's membership in the categories "male" and "female" and discounting the validity of nonbinary gender identities are forms of bias, and studying them will be essential to build a more nuanced understanding of stereotyping and prejudice. The authors review the literature on bias against transgender people and bias against nonbinary people, discuss the methodological and theoretical challenges in studying these biases, propose an approach for interpreting results in light of common (mis)categorization processes, and consider avenues for future research.Public AbstractThis article reviews research about bias against transgender women and men and bias against people with nonbinary gender identities. Many people hold false beliefs about transgender men's and women's membership in the categories "male" and "female." Also, many people view nonbinary gender identities as illegitimate. Both discounting transgender men's and women's membership in the categories "male" and "female" and discounting the validity of nonbinary gender identities are forms of bias. Thoroughly investigating these forms of bias will help researchers build a more a nuanced understanding of the biases that target transgender and nonbinary people. This observation helps put much of the past research in context, and it could make future research stronger by distinguishing between kinds of bias and encouraging more precise measurement and experimentation.
对跨性别男女和非二元性别认同者的心理偏见形式。
学术摘要:本文综述了对跨性别女性和男性的偏见以及对非二元性别认同者的偏见。一个核心论点是,许多人对跨性别男性和女性在“男性”和“女性”类别中的归属持有错误的信念,并且单独地认为非二元性别身份本身是非法的。将跨性别男性和女性排除在“男性”和“女性”的范畴之外,以及排除非二元性别认同的有效性,都是一种偏见,研究它们对于更细致地理解刻板印象和偏见至关重要。作者回顾了对跨性别者和非二元性别者的偏见的文献,讨论了研究这些偏见的方法和理论挑战,提出了一种根据常见(错误)分类过程解释结果的方法,并考虑了未来研究的途径。摘要本文综述了针对跨性别女性和跨性别男性的偏见以及针对非二元性别认同者的偏见的研究。许多人对跨性别者的“男性”和“女性”分类持有错误的看法。此外,许多人认为非二元性别身份是非法的。无论是对跨性别男性和女性在“男性”和“女性”类别中的地位的贬低,还是对非二元性别认同的有效性的贬低,都是一种偏见。彻底调查这些形式的偏见将有助于研究人员对针对跨性别者和非二元性别者的偏见有更细致的了解。这一观察有助于将过去的许多研究置于背景中,并通过区分各种偏见和鼓励更精确的测量和实验,可以使未来的研究更加强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Title: Personality and Social Psychology Review (PSPR) Journal Overview: Official journal of SPSP, the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc. Premiere outlet for original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles in all areas of personality and social psychology Features stimulating conceptual pieces identifying new research directions and comprehensive review papers providing integrative frameworks for existing theory and research programs Topics Covered: Attitudes and Social Cognition: Examines the inner workings of the human mind in understanding, evaluating, and responding to the social environment Interpersonal and Group Processes: Explores patterns of interaction and interdependence characterizing everyday human functioning Intergroup Relations: Investigates determinants of prejudice, conflict, cooperation, and harmonious relationships between social groups Personality and Individual Differences: Focuses on causes, assessment, structures, and processes giving rise to human variation Biological and Cultural Influences: Studies the biological and cultural mediation of social psychological and personality processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信