Rebecca D. Henkel MD , Kristin Melton MD , Tanya Cahill MD , Melissa House MD , Julisa Muñoz , Christa Tabacaru MD , Chunyan Liu MS , Shelley R. Ehrlich MD, ScD, MPH , Heather C. Kaplan MD, MSCE
{"title":"Effects of Remote Patient Monitoring on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Patients Discharged with Nasogastric Tube Feeding","authors":"Rebecca D. Henkel MD , Kristin Melton MD , Tanya Cahill MD , Melissa House MD , Julisa Muñoz , Christa Tabacaru MD , Chunyan Liu MS , Shelley R. Ehrlich MD, ScD, MPH , Heather C. Kaplan MD, MSCE","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine whether discharge with remote patient monitoring (RPM) is associated with improved outcomes among infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit with a nasogastric tube (NGT).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of infants discharged with an NGT from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center neonatal intensive care unit from 2015 to 2022. Infants were divided into pre-RPM and RPM cohorts. Differences in clinical characteristics, weight at follow-up, and unplanned health care utilization were evaluated using multivariable generalized linear regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 385 eligible patients (n = 139 pre-RPM, n = 246 RPM). Infants discharged with RPM had higher rates of prematurity. The RPM group was discharged at an earlier postmenstrual age (43.00 vs 44.12 weeks, <em>P</em> = .0102) and had more favorable change in weight z-score at follow-up (0.21 [0.03, 0.4] at 3 months, 0.34 [0.09, 0.58)] at 6 months). The risk of unplanned admissions or emergency department visits was 53% lower in the RPM group than in the pre-RPM group (risk ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.79]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients discharged with an NGT plus RPM were discharged at earlier postmenstrual age, had more favorable growth trajectory, and had fewer unplanned health care encounters, indicating that discharge with NGT feeds with RPM appears to be safer and more effective than discharge with NGT feeds without RPM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 114802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625003439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To examine whether discharge with remote patient monitoring (RPM) is associated with improved outcomes among infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit with a nasogastric tube (NGT).
Study design
This was a retrospective cohort study of infants discharged with an NGT from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center neonatal intensive care unit from 2015 to 2022. Infants were divided into pre-RPM and RPM cohorts. Differences in clinical characteristics, weight at follow-up, and unplanned health care utilization were evaluated using multivariable generalized linear regression models.
Results
There were 385 eligible patients (n = 139 pre-RPM, n = 246 RPM). Infants discharged with RPM had higher rates of prematurity. The RPM group was discharged at an earlier postmenstrual age (43.00 vs 44.12 weeks, P = .0102) and had more favorable change in weight z-score at follow-up (0.21 [0.03, 0.4] at 3 months, 0.34 [0.09, 0.58)] at 6 months). The risk of unplanned admissions or emergency department visits was 53% lower in the RPM group than in the pre-RPM group (risk ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.79]).
Conclusions
Patients discharged with an NGT plus RPM were discharged at earlier postmenstrual age, had more favorable growth trajectory, and had fewer unplanned health care encounters, indicating that discharge with NGT feeds with RPM appears to be safer and more effective than discharge with NGT feeds without RPM.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.