Jennifer L Copeland, Milena Zdjelar, Danielle R Bouchard, Irmina Klicnik, Brianna Leadbetter, Shilpa Dogra
{"title":"Stand When You Can: Feasibility of a Multilevel, Multisite Sedentary Behavior Intervention in Assisted-Living Residences.","authors":"Jennifer L Copeland, Milena Zdjelar, Danielle R Bouchard, Irmina Klicnik, Brianna Leadbetter, Shilpa Dogra","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Prolonged sedentary time poses health risks for older adults, and residents in assisted living spend more time sedentary than peers who live independently. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of Stand When You Can, a sedentary behavior intervention designed to encourage residents of assisted living to stand and move throughout the day without requiring structured program delivery or additional staff time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five assisted-living residences in three provinces volunteered to use the Stand When You Can toolkit for 12 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment capability for ambassadors and participants, participant characteristics, and pre-post assessment of target outcome measures. Intervention fidelity was assessed at 6 weeks using on-site observations and informal interviews with staff and participants. Target outcomes included movement behaviors, physical function, and health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight older adults volunteered to participate, and a staff ambassador volunteered from each site. Only one site demonstrated good intervention fidelity by implementing a variety of different strategies to reduce sedentary time. Assessment of target outcomes was feasible, although there was significant attrition and >50% of individual participants did not complete follow-up testing at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While Stand When You Can was designed to be embedded in normal daily activities and require minimal staff time, it may not be feasible for most assisted-living residences to implement without additional staff.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>To help residents maintain function and quality of life, assisted-living residences must invest in adequate staff with the time and tools to promote a culture of movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Prolonged sedentary time poses health risks for older adults, and residents in assisted living spend more time sedentary than peers who live independently. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of Stand When You Can, a sedentary behavior intervention designed to encourage residents of assisted living to stand and move throughout the day without requiring structured program delivery or additional staff time.
Methods: Five assisted-living residences in three provinces volunteered to use the Stand When You Can toolkit for 12 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment capability for ambassadors and participants, participant characteristics, and pre-post assessment of target outcome measures. Intervention fidelity was assessed at 6 weeks using on-site observations and informal interviews with staff and participants. Target outcomes included movement behaviors, physical function, and health status.
Results: Sixty-eight older adults volunteered to participate, and a staff ambassador volunteered from each site. Only one site demonstrated good intervention fidelity by implementing a variety of different strategies to reduce sedentary time. Assessment of target outcomes was feasible, although there was significant attrition and >50% of individual participants did not complete follow-up testing at 12 weeks.
Conclusion: While Stand When You Can was designed to be embedded in normal daily activities and require minimal staff time, it may not be feasible for most assisted-living residences to implement without additional staff.
Significance: To help residents maintain function and quality of life, assisted-living residences must invest in adequate staff with the time and tools to promote a culture of movement.
背景/目的:久坐不动的时间延长会给老年人带来健康风险,辅助生活的居民比独立生活的同龄人坐着的时间更长。本研究的目的是检验站立的可行性,这是一种久坐行为干预,旨在鼓励辅助生活的居民在一天中站立和活动,而不需要结构化的计划交付或额外的工作人员时间。方法:三省五所养老院自愿使用“能站就站”工具包,为期12周。可行性结果包括大使和参与者的招募能力、参与者特征和目标结果措施的前后评估。通过现场观察和对工作人员和参与者的非正式访谈,在6周时评估干预的保真度。目标结果包括运动行为、身体功能和健康状况。结果:68名老年人自愿参加,每个地点都有一名工作人员大使自愿参加。只有一个地点通过实施各种不同的策略来减少久坐时间,表现出良好的干预保真度。目标结果的评估是可行的,尽管有显著的减员,并且50%的个体参与者在12周时没有完成随访测试。结论:虽然Stand When You Can被设计为嵌入到日常活动中,并且需要最少的工作人员时间,但如果没有额外的工作人员,大多数辅助生活住宅可能不可行。意义:为了帮助居民保持功能和生活质量,辅助生活住宅必须投入足够的时间和工具来促进运动文化的工作人员。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults.
In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.