Magnitude and determinants of underreporting needlestick injuries among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital.

Aiman El-Saed, Fatmah Othman, Sarah Al-Fayez, Abdullah Turki Alotaibi, Nada Wagit Alharthi, Ryad Fahad Alamry, Mohammed Khalaf Alharbi, Hisham Yousef AlOuhali, Ahmad Elsaed, Rama M Matalqah, Majid M Alshamrani
{"title":"Magnitude and determinants of underreporting needlestick injuries among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital.","authors":"Aiman El-Saed, Fatmah Othman, Sarah Al-Fayez, Abdullah Turki Alotaibi, Nada Wagit Alharthi, Ryad Fahad Alamry, Mohammed Khalaf Alharbi, Hisham Yousef AlOuhali, Ahmad Elsaed, Rama M Matalqah, Majid M Alshamrani","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needlestick injuries (NSIs) among healthcare workers (HCWs) represent a major occupational risk. While the underreporting of NSI is well-acknowledged, there are limited data on its magnitude. The objective was to estimate the incidence of NSIs and the degree of underreporting among HCWs and their influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out at a large tertiary care hospital. The study targeted clinical HCWs who were directly involved in patient care in different departments/units. Non-clinical HCWs and students/trainees were excluded. Data were collected using a structured online questionnaire that includes HCWs characteristics and injury information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 529 HCWs were included. The mean age of HCWs was 35.0 ± 8.6 years. Most HCWs were females (76.6 %), nurses (69.8 %), and non-Saudi (61.9 %). A total of 158 (29.8 %) HCWs had at least one NSI event sometime during healthcare service, including 28 (5.3 %) during the last year. NSIs were highest in dental clinics (44.4 %), followed by surgical wards (38.8 %), ICUs (34.1 %), emergency unit (21.4 %), and non-surgical wards (18.2 %, p = 0.007). Out of those who had NSIs, 18.4 % did not report their event. Non-reporting was highest among physician and other HCWs (38.5 % each), followed by dentists (27.3 %), and lastly nurses (10.2 %). Additionally, non-reporting NSIs was significantly higher among Saudi HCWs and those who were unaware about protocol and methods of NSIs reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show a considerable underreporting of NSIs, especially among non-nursing professions. There is an urgent need to implement strategies that promote reporting practices, including awareness campaigns and efficient reporting systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Needlestick injuries (NSIs) among healthcare workers (HCWs) represent a major occupational risk. While the underreporting of NSI is well-acknowledged, there are limited data on its magnitude. The objective was to estimate the incidence of NSIs and the degree of underreporting among HCWs and their influencing factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at a large tertiary care hospital. The study targeted clinical HCWs who were directly involved in patient care in different departments/units. Non-clinical HCWs and students/trainees were excluded. Data were collected using a structured online questionnaire that includes HCWs characteristics and injury information.

Results: A total of 529 HCWs were included. The mean age of HCWs was 35.0 ± 8.6 years. Most HCWs were females (76.6 %), nurses (69.8 %), and non-Saudi (61.9 %). A total of 158 (29.8 %) HCWs had at least one NSI event sometime during healthcare service, including 28 (5.3 %) during the last year. NSIs were highest in dental clinics (44.4 %), followed by surgical wards (38.8 %), ICUs (34.1 %), emergency unit (21.4 %), and non-surgical wards (18.2 %, p = 0.007). Out of those who had NSIs, 18.4 % did not report their event. Non-reporting was highest among physician and other HCWs (38.5 % each), followed by dentists (27.3 %), and lastly nurses (10.2 %). Additionally, non-reporting NSIs was significantly higher among Saudi HCWs and those who were unaware about protocol and methods of NSIs reporting.

Conclusion: The findings show a considerable underreporting of NSIs, especially among non-nursing professions. There is an urgent need to implement strategies that promote reporting practices, including awareness campaigns and efficient reporting systems.

三级保健医院医护人员针刺伤漏报的规模和决定因素。
背景:医护人员(HCWs)中针刺伤(nsi)是一种主要的职业风险。虽然对NSI的少报是公认的,但关于其严重程度的数据有限。目的是估计医护人员nsi的发生率、漏报程度及其影响因素。方法:在某大型三级医院进行横断面研究。本研究针对直接参与不同科室/单位患者护理的临床卫生保健员。非临床医护人员和学生/实习生被排除在外。通过结构化的在线问卷收集数据,包括HCWs特征和损伤信息。结果:共纳入HCWs 529例。患者平均年龄为35.0±8.6岁。大多数卫生保健工作者是女性(76.6%)、护士(69.8%)和非沙特人(61.9%)。共有158名(29.8%)医护人员在医疗服务期间至少发生过一次自伤事件,其中去年有28名(5.3%)。nsi发生率最高的是牙科门诊(44.4%),其次是外科病房(38.8%)、icu(34.1%)、急诊病房(21.4%)和非手术病房(18.2%,p = 0.007)。在有nsi的患者中,18.4%没有报告他们的事件。医生和其他卫生保健工作者的未报告率最高(各占38.5%),其次是牙医(27.3%),最后是护士(10.2%)。此外,未报告的nsi在沙特卫生保健工作者和那些不知道nsi报告的协议和方法的人中显着更高。结论:调查结果显示,nsi有相当大的漏报,特别是在非护理专业中。迫切需要执行促进报告做法的战略,包括提高认识运动和有效的报告制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信