Marianne Baastrup Soendergaard, Kjell Erik Julius Håkansson, Susanne Hansen, Anne-Sofie Bjerrum, Johannes Martin Schmid, Sofie Lock Johansson, Linda Makowska Rasmussen, Claus Rikard Johnsen, Barbara Bonnesen, Roxana Vijdea, Anna von Bülow, Niels Steen Krogh, Ole Hilberg, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Celeste Porsbjerg
{"title":"Tezepelumab in real-life practice: Characteristics of patients commenced and efficacy in a nationwide, Danish cohort of patients with severe asthma.","authors":"Marianne Baastrup Soendergaard, Kjell Erik Julius Håkansson, Susanne Hansen, Anne-Sofie Bjerrum, Johannes Martin Schmid, Sofie Lock Johansson, Linda Makowska Rasmussen, Claus Rikard Johnsen, Barbara Bonnesen, Roxana Vijdea, Anna von Bülow, Niels Steen Krogh, Ole Hilberg, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Celeste Porsbjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tezepelumab holds significant potential in severe asthma owing to its upstream target in the inflammatory cascade and could be an appropriate choice of biologic for different patient groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to characterise the patients prescribed tezepelumab during the first two years of the drug being available and its illuminate efficacy in a nationwide Danish cohort of patients with severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, we used data from the Danish Severe Asthma Register (DSAR). We categorised patients according to their previous biological treatment as either Biologic-naive or Switchers, compared baseline charecteristics and investigated efficacy after 12 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 273 patients initiated on tezepelumab, 171 (63 %) were switchers. Biologic-naive patients had a median blood eosinophil count of 0.20 cells x 10<sup>9</sup>/L and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) of 17 ppb. 172 patients were included in efficacy analyses and after 12 months of treatment, both biologic-naive patients and switchers showed significant improvements in maintenance oral corticosteroid use, symptoms and reduced exacerbations by 69 %. The majority of patients in both groups achieved a clinical response to treatment, however, a larger proportion of biologic-naïve patients achieved clinical remission (35 % vs 15 %, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients initiating tezepelumab in real-life clinical practice were switchers, and the biologic-naive patients initiated had relatively low type-2 inflammatory biomarkers, highlighting the complexity of patients on tezepelumab. However, both groups showed a clinical response rate to treatment, comparable to that seen in Danish patients initiated on other biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.09.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tezepelumab holds significant potential in severe asthma owing to its upstream target in the inflammatory cascade and could be an appropriate choice of biologic for different patient groups.
Objectives: We aimed to characterise the patients prescribed tezepelumab during the first two years of the drug being available and its illuminate efficacy in a nationwide Danish cohort of patients with severe asthma.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, we used data from the Danish Severe Asthma Register (DSAR). We categorised patients according to their previous biological treatment as either Biologic-naive or Switchers, compared baseline charecteristics and investigated efficacy after 12 months of treatment.
Results: Of the 273 patients initiated on tezepelumab, 171 (63 %) were switchers. Biologic-naive patients had a median blood eosinophil count of 0.20 cells x 109/L and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) of 17 ppb. 172 patients were included in efficacy analyses and after 12 months of treatment, both biologic-naive patients and switchers showed significant improvements in maintenance oral corticosteroid use, symptoms and reduced exacerbations by 69 %. The majority of patients in both groups achieved a clinical response to treatment, however, a larger proportion of biologic-naïve patients achieved clinical remission (35 % vs 15 %, p=0.01).
Conclusion: Most patients initiating tezepelumab in real-life clinical practice were switchers, and the biologic-naive patients initiated had relatively low type-2 inflammatory biomarkers, highlighting the complexity of patients on tezepelumab. However, both groups showed a clinical response rate to treatment, comparable to that seen in Danish patients initiated on other biologics.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.