{"title":"Adherence to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease guidelines in primary care: The Greek COPD COCARE study","authors":"Ioanna Tsiligianni , Stavroula Papageorgakopoulou , Izolde Bouloukaki","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although adherence to COPD guidelines among general practitioners (GPs) is essential for providing effective patient care, research indicates significant variation in their implementation. We aimed to evaluate adherence to COPD guidelines in primary care in Greece and explore opportunities for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study was conducted in eight primary care practices in Crete, Greece with 10 GPs participating. Patients identified by GPs with COPD diagnosis were included. Clinical performance vs current guidelines was categorized into levels of appropriateness: excellent (>80 %), good (60–80 %), adequate (40–59 %), inadequate (20–39 %), and very inadequate (<20 %).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>253 clinical records were reviewed. Adherence to guideline statements presented an excellent/good adherence for smoking (94 %), vaccination (93–96 %), exacerbations (72 %) and co-morbidities recording (87 %) and further workup with chest X-ray or CT (71 %). However, guideline-concordant prescriptions for inhaled therapies were documented in only 34 % of the patient population. The most outstanding areas for improvement included evaluating COPD risk factors beyond smoking (14 %), measuring alpha1-antitrypsin levels (2 %), monitoring treatment adherence (12 %), referring patients to pulmonary rehabilitation (8 %), considering eosinophil counts for treatment initiation (10 %), developing written self-management plans (10 %), and assessing non-prescribed medications (19 %). Guideline adherence varied substantially between rural and urban settings across several key areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results show that adherence to COPD guidelines among GPs is suboptimal and varies between rural and urban settings. Such information must be accounted for by health care professionals and administrators in primary care, to improve strategies and establish better clinical practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 108345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125004081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Although adherence to COPD guidelines among general practitioners (GPs) is essential for providing effective patient care, research indicates significant variation in their implementation. We aimed to evaluate adherence to COPD guidelines in primary care in Greece and explore opportunities for improvement.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in eight primary care practices in Crete, Greece with 10 GPs participating. Patients identified by GPs with COPD diagnosis were included. Clinical performance vs current guidelines was categorized into levels of appropriateness: excellent (>80 %), good (60–80 %), adequate (40–59 %), inadequate (20–39 %), and very inadequate (<20 %).
Results
253 clinical records were reviewed. Adherence to guideline statements presented an excellent/good adherence for smoking (94 %), vaccination (93–96 %), exacerbations (72 %) and co-morbidities recording (87 %) and further workup with chest X-ray or CT (71 %). However, guideline-concordant prescriptions for inhaled therapies were documented in only 34 % of the patient population. The most outstanding areas for improvement included evaluating COPD risk factors beyond smoking (14 %), measuring alpha1-antitrypsin levels (2 %), monitoring treatment adherence (12 %), referring patients to pulmonary rehabilitation (8 %), considering eosinophil counts for treatment initiation (10 %), developing written self-management plans (10 %), and assessing non-prescribed medications (19 %). Guideline adherence varied substantially between rural and urban settings across several key areas.
Conclusion
Our results show that adherence to COPD guidelines among GPs is suboptimal and varies between rural and urban settings. Such information must be accounted for by health care professionals and administrators in primary care, to improve strategies and establish better clinical practices.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.