Anxiety and Self-Perceived Voice Assessments in Patients With Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia and Healthy Speakers: A Comparative and Correlative Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Saeideh Moayedfar, Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami, Pejman Aghdak, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Payman Dabirmoghaddam
{"title":"Anxiety and Self-Perceived Voice Assessments in Patients With Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia and Healthy Speakers: A Comparative and Correlative Study.","authors":"Saeideh Moayedfar, Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami, Pejman Aghdak, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Payman Dabirmoghaddam","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.07.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Limited research has examined anxiety in muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). This study aimed to compare anxiety levels between primary MTD patients and healthy speakers. Additionally, it explored self-perceived voice characteristics and their relationship with anxiety in both groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 223 participants were recruited, including 120 primary MTD patients and 103 healthy speakers. Anxiety levels and severity were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Self-perceived voice assessments, including voice self-assessment, vocal effort, vocal tract discomfort (VTD), vocal fatigue index (VFI), and voice-related pain scale (VRPS), were conducted to compare self-voice perceptions between the two groups. Additionally, correlations between anxiety and self-perceived voice measures were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean BAI score was significantly higher in patients than in healthy speakers, with a weak effect size (P = 0.0001, η² = 0.122). While most participants in both groups had mild anxiety, anxiety severity was significantly associated with MTD status (P = 0.0001). Significant differences were found between the two groups in voice self-assessment (P = 0.0001) and in vocal effort, VTD, VFI, and VRPS scores (P < 0.05). The Bonferroni correction (α = 0.007) indicated significant positive correlations for the VTD frequency (r = 0.34, P = 0.001) and the VTD severity (r = 0.34, P = 0.001) in the healthy speakers. Comparison with patients showed that three measures (all positive) were significant in the patient group. Comparison using Fisher's z tests revealed no statistically significant differences between two groups for any individual measure (all > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the higher anxiety levels in primary MTD patients compared with healthy individuals, a psychogenic or multidisciplinary approach can be integrated into their assessment and voice therapy. The findings should be interpreted with consideration of the absence of additional tools for anxiety assessment and the presence of disordered control groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.07.041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Limited research has examined anxiety in muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). This study aimed to compare anxiety levels between primary MTD patients and healthy speakers. Additionally, it explored self-perceived voice characteristics and their relationship with anxiety in both groups.

Methods: A total of 223 participants were recruited, including 120 primary MTD patients and 103 healthy speakers. Anxiety levels and severity were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Self-perceived voice assessments, including voice self-assessment, vocal effort, vocal tract discomfort (VTD), vocal fatigue index (VFI), and voice-related pain scale (VRPS), were conducted to compare self-voice perceptions between the two groups. Additionally, correlations between anxiety and self-perceived voice measures were analyzed.

Results: The mean BAI score was significantly higher in patients than in healthy speakers, with a weak effect size (P = 0.0001, η² = 0.122). While most participants in both groups had mild anxiety, anxiety severity was significantly associated with MTD status (P = 0.0001). Significant differences were found between the two groups in voice self-assessment (P = 0.0001) and in vocal effort, VTD, VFI, and VRPS scores (P < 0.05). The Bonferroni correction (α = 0.007) indicated significant positive correlations for the VTD frequency (r = 0.34, P = 0.001) and the VTD severity (r = 0.34, P = 0.001) in the healthy speakers. Comparison with patients showed that three measures (all positive) were significant in the patient group. Comparison using Fisher's z tests revealed no statistically significant differences between two groups for any individual measure (all > 0.05).

Conclusion: Given the higher anxiety levels in primary MTD patients compared with healthy individuals, a psychogenic or multidisciplinary approach can be integrated into their assessment and voice therapy. The findings should be interpreted with consideration of the absence of additional tools for anxiety assessment and the presence of disordered control groups.

原发性肌肉紧张性发声障碍患者和健康说话者的焦虑和自我语音感知评估:一项比较和相关研究。
目的:有限的研究检查了肌肉紧张性发声障碍(MTD)的焦虑。本研究旨在比较原发性MTD患者和健康说话者的焦虑水平。此外,它还探讨了两组自我感知的声音特征及其与焦虑的关系。方法:共招募223名参与者,其中包括120名原发性MTD患者和103名健康演讲者。使用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)评估焦虑水平和严重程度。通过自我感知声音评估,包括声音自我评估、发声努力度、声道不适(VTD)、发声疲劳指数(VFI)和声音相关疼痛量表(VRPS),比较两组的自我感知声音。此外,还分析了焦虑与自我感知语音测量之间的相关性。结果:患者的平均BAI评分显著高于健康说话者,且效应值较弱(P = 0.0001, η²= 0.122)。虽然两组中大多数参与者都有轻度焦虑,但焦虑严重程度与MTD状态显著相关(P = 0.0001)。两组在语音自我评估(P = 0.0001)和语音用力、VTD、VFI、VRPS评分上均有显著差异(P 0.05)。结论:与健康个体相比,原发性MTD患者的焦虑水平较高,因此可以将心理或多学科方法整合到他们的评估和语音治疗中。研究结果的解释应考虑到缺乏额外的焦虑评估工具和存在障碍对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信