Assessing the reliability and association of pain ratings and skin conductance responses: Insights from habituation and sensitization to pain

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maite M. van der Miesen , Catherine J. Vossen , Judith Eck , Sophie Kühne , Elbert A.J. Joosten , David E.J. Linden , Judith C. Peters
{"title":"Assessing the reliability and association of pain ratings and skin conductance responses: Insights from habituation and sensitization to pain","authors":"Maite M. van der Miesen ,&nbsp;Catherine J. Vossen ,&nbsp;Judith Eck ,&nbsp;Sophie Kühne ,&nbsp;Elbert A.J. Joosten ,&nbsp;David E.J. Linden ,&nbsp;Judith C. Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repeated painful stimulation results in substantial inter-individual differences in habituation and sensitization. The extent to which these responses reflect state versus trait characteristics remains unclear, highlighting the need to assess the reliability of these differences over time. Furthermore, the association between subjective pain ratings and skin conductance responses (SCR) has not been examined in this context. This preregistered study investigated profiles of habituation and sensitization to pain across two sessions using pain ratings and SCR. Participants underwent repeated painful electrical stimulation over two sessions separated by four weeks, receiving 75 stimuli across three runs per session. Pain intensity was rated after each stimulus, and continuous SCRs were recorded. Our results demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability of both pain ratings and SCRs, with within-run measures showing greater consistency than across-run measures. Remarkably, participants displaying sensitization exhibited higher reliability than those with habituation or no-change patterns. High test-retest reliability could suggest a trait-like response with reduced adaptability to repeated stimulation, while a higher variability (and thus low test-retest reliability) indicates state-dependent flexibility and adaptability. Our results suggest that interventions to modulate pain could be targeted at changing such sensitization patterns and promoting habituation. Furthermore, pain ratings showed diverse trajectories of habituation and sensitization, whereas SCRs predominantly habituated. This dissociation between subjective pain perception and autonomic responses challenges the prevailing view that higher pain ratings correspond to elevated SCRs. Together, these results underscore the importance of considering habituation and sensitization dynamics, with subjective and physiological measures providing complementary insights into the multidimensional pain response.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Repeated painful stimulation resulted in patterns of habituation and sensitization, with large individual variability. Test-retest reliability was moderate, with higher consistency for individuals who sensitize. A dissociation between ratings and SCR was demonstrated, with diverse response patterns of ratings and mostly habituation of the SCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 105557"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repeated painful stimulation results in substantial inter-individual differences in habituation and sensitization. The extent to which these responses reflect state versus trait characteristics remains unclear, highlighting the need to assess the reliability of these differences over time. Furthermore, the association between subjective pain ratings and skin conductance responses (SCR) has not been examined in this context. This preregistered study investigated profiles of habituation and sensitization to pain across two sessions using pain ratings and SCR. Participants underwent repeated painful electrical stimulation over two sessions separated by four weeks, receiving 75 stimuli across three runs per session. Pain intensity was rated after each stimulus, and continuous SCRs were recorded. Our results demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability of both pain ratings and SCRs, with within-run measures showing greater consistency than across-run measures. Remarkably, participants displaying sensitization exhibited higher reliability than those with habituation or no-change patterns. High test-retest reliability could suggest a trait-like response with reduced adaptability to repeated stimulation, while a higher variability (and thus low test-retest reliability) indicates state-dependent flexibility and adaptability. Our results suggest that interventions to modulate pain could be targeted at changing such sensitization patterns and promoting habituation. Furthermore, pain ratings showed diverse trajectories of habituation and sensitization, whereas SCRs predominantly habituated. This dissociation between subjective pain perception and autonomic responses challenges the prevailing view that higher pain ratings correspond to elevated SCRs. Together, these results underscore the importance of considering habituation and sensitization dynamics, with subjective and physiological measures providing complementary insights into the multidimensional pain response.

Perspective

Repeated painful stimulation resulted in patterns of habituation and sensitization, with large individual variability. Test-retest reliability was moderate, with higher consistency for individuals who sensitize. A dissociation between ratings and SCR was demonstrated, with diverse response patterns of ratings and mostly habituation of the SCR.
评估疼痛等级和皮肤电导反应的可靠性和相关性:来自疼痛习惯化和敏感化的见解。
反复的疼痛刺激导致个体间在习惯化和敏化方面的巨大差异。这些反应在多大程度上反映了状态与特质的特征仍然不清楚,这突出了评估这些差异随时间变化的可靠性的必要性。此外,主观疼痛评分和皮肤电导反应(SCR)之间的关系尚未在此背景下进行研究。这项预先注册的研究使用疼痛评分和SCR调查了两个阶段对疼痛的习惯化和敏感化的概况。参与者在为期四周的两个疗程中反复接受痛苦的电刺激,每个疗程三次,接受75次刺激。每次刺激后评定疼痛强度,并记录连续scr。我们的研究结果表明,疼痛评分和scr的重测信度适中,组内测量比组间测量显示出更大的一致性。值得注意的是,显示敏化的参与者比习惯化或无变化模式的参与者表现出更高的可靠性。高测试重测信度可能表明对重复刺激的适应性降低,而较高的变异性(因此较低的测试重测信度)表明状态依赖的灵活性和适应性。我们的研究结果表明,调节疼痛的干预措施可以针对改变这种敏感模式和促进习惯。此外,疼痛评分显示出不同的习惯化和敏化轨迹,而scr主要是习惯化。主观疼痛感知和自主神经反应之间的分离挑战了普遍的观点,即更高的疼痛等级对应于更高的scr。总之,这些结果强调了考虑习惯化和致敏动力学的重要性,主观和生理测量为多维疼痛反应提供了互补的见解。观点:反复的疼痛刺激导致习惯化和敏化模式,具有很大的个体差异。重测信度为中等,对敏感者具有较高的一致性。评分和SCR之间存在分离,评分的反应模式不同,主要是SCR的习惯化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信