Postoperative delirium after short-acting spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia after shared decision-making.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-13 DOI:10.1177/03000605251363408
Valesca Kipping, Timo B Kerlin, Friedrich Borchers, Margret F Külken, Marilena Schmid, Christopher S Ahrend, Janine Wiebach, Sophie K Piper, Klaus D Wernecke, Anika Müller, Claudia D Spies
{"title":"Postoperative delirium after short-acting spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia after shared decision-making.","authors":"Valesca Kipping, Timo B Kerlin, Friedrich Borchers, Margret F Külken, Marilena Schmid, Christopher S Ahrend, Janine Wiebach, Sophie K Piper, Klaus D Wernecke, Anika Müller, Claudia D Spies","doi":"10.1177/03000605251363408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePrevious studies have shown that the postoperative delirium rate does not differ between anesthetic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Subjective concerns such as anxiety and pain are often not adequately addressed in randomized controlled trials and reported to be associated with postoperative delirium. Shared decision-making is reported to have an impact on anxiety and pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of shared decision-making while making a choice between spinal and general anesthesia on postoperative delirium incidence.MethodsThis prospective, observational, two-armed cohort study included 192 patients who underwent lower extremity, lower abdominal, pelvic, or perineal short-time surgery that lasted <90 min. The three-talk shared decision-making model was used to make the choice for the type of anesthesia. Depending on the shared decision-making process, either spinal anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetics (prilocaine hydrochloride or chloroprocaine hydrochloride) or general anesthesia was performed according to a standardized protocol including intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring. Patients' anxiety and pain levels were measured before and after the surgery using validated scales.ResultsBased on their shared decision-making choice of anesthesia, 97 patients were allocated to the spinal anesthesia group and 95 to the general anesthesia group. Postoperative delirium occurred less frequently after spinal anesthesia (2.1%) than after general anesthesia (16.8%; p < 0.001). No postoperative delirium was observed in patients who received only spinal anesthesia, as chosen using the shared decision-making model (spinal anesthesia: 0%, general anesthesia 16.8%; p < 0.001). Anxiety and pain levels did not differ between the two groups.ConclusionsThe incidence of postoperative delirium was lower in patients who were administered spinal anesthesia than in those who were administered general anesthesia after using a shared decision-making approach. Integrating patients' perspectives and treatment preferences might change postoperative outcomes and should be taken into consideration in future trials.<b>Trial registration:</b> clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03715244https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03715244?intr=NCT03715244&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 9","pages":"3000605251363408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251363408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivePrevious studies have shown that the postoperative delirium rate does not differ between anesthetic techniques in randomized controlled trials. Subjective concerns such as anxiety and pain are often not adequately addressed in randomized controlled trials and reported to be associated with postoperative delirium. Shared decision-making is reported to have an impact on anxiety and pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of shared decision-making while making a choice between spinal and general anesthesia on postoperative delirium incidence.MethodsThis prospective, observational, two-armed cohort study included 192 patients who underwent lower extremity, lower abdominal, pelvic, or perineal short-time surgery that lasted <90 min. The three-talk shared decision-making model was used to make the choice for the type of anesthesia. Depending on the shared decision-making process, either spinal anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetics (prilocaine hydrochloride or chloroprocaine hydrochloride) or general anesthesia was performed according to a standardized protocol including intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring. Patients' anxiety and pain levels were measured before and after the surgery using validated scales.ResultsBased on their shared decision-making choice of anesthesia, 97 patients were allocated to the spinal anesthesia group and 95 to the general anesthesia group. Postoperative delirium occurred less frequently after spinal anesthesia (2.1%) than after general anesthesia (16.8%; p < 0.001). No postoperative delirium was observed in patients who received only spinal anesthesia, as chosen using the shared decision-making model (spinal anesthesia: 0%, general anesthesia 16.8%; p < 0.001). Anxiety and pain levels did not differ between the two groups.ConclusionsThe incidence of postoperative delirium was lower in patients who were administered spinal anesthesia than in those who were administered general anesthesia after using a shared decision-making approach. Integrating patients' perspectives and treatment preferences might change postoperative outcomes and should be taken into consideration in future trials.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03715244https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03715244?intr=NCT03715244&rank=1.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

短效脊髓麻醉和全麻共同决策后的术后谵妄。
目的以往的研究表明,在随机对照试验中,不同麻醉方法术后谵妄率没有差异。在随机对照试验中,焦虑和疼痛等主观顾虑往往没有得到充分的解决,并被报道与术后谵妄有关。据报道,共同决策对焦虑和疼痛有影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估共同决策在选择脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉时对术后谵妄发生率的影响。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性、双臂队列研究纳入了192例接受下肢、下腹部、骨盆或会阴短期手术的患者。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03715244https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03715244?intr=NCT03715244&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信