Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay with pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens: a retrospective evaluation in a low-incidence setting in Finland.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bruno Luukinen, Maarit Ahava, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Anu Pätäri-Sampo
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay with pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens: a retrospective evaluation in a low-incidence setting in Finland.","authors":"Bruno Luukinen, Maarit Ahava, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Anu Pätäri-Sampo","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay in the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in comparison to pulmonary TB in a low-incidence setting in the Helsinki capital area of Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective analysis included results from 1112 pulmonary and 705 extrapulmonary samples collected between 2018 and 2023, of which 193 and 136 were culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), respectively. Xpert Ultra results were compared with mycobacterial culture. PCR-positive and culture-negative cases were separately compared with available clinical data (composite reference standard, CRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with culture, Xpert Ultra demonstrated 95.3% sensitivity (95% CI, 91.3%-97.7%) and 94.5% specificity (95% CI, 92.8%-95.8%) with pulmonary samples, 47.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-69.0%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.4%) with pleural fluid, 100% (95% CI, 86.9%-100%) and 81.8% (95% CI, 72.4%-88.6%) with tissue, 96.6% (95% CI, 81.4%-100%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 62.2%-84.6%) with pus, and 95.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.5%) and 67.5% (95% CI, 51.9%-80.0%) with lymph node samples, respectively. Other, less common sample types were also included. When CRS was also considered, specificity exceeded 93% for all sample types. Sensitivity was 100% with both smear-positive pulmonary and smear-positive extrapulmonary samples. Neither false rifampicin susceptibility testing results nor cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria was detected.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Xpert Ultra detected MTB in lymph node, tissue, and pus samples with high-accuracy comparable with the analysis of pulmonary samples while reducing the time to diagnosis by up to several weeks compared with mycobacterial culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay in the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in comparison to pulmonary TB in a low-incidence setting in the Helsinki capital area of Finland.

Methods: The retrospective analysis included results from 1112 pulmonary and 705 extrapulmonary samples collected between 2018 and 2023, of which 193 and 136 were culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), respectively. Xpert Ultra results were compared with mycobacterial culture. PCR-positive and culture-negative cases were separately compared with available clinical data (composite reference standard, CRS).

Results: Compared with culture, Xpert Ultra demonstrated 95.3% sensitivity (95% CI, 91.3%-97.7%) and 94.5% specificity (95% CI, 92.8%-95.8%) with pulmonary samples, 47.1% (95% CI, 26.2%-69.0%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.4%) with pleural fluid, 100% (95% CI, 86.9%-100%) and 81.8% (95% CI, 72.4%-88.6%) with tissue, 96.6% (95% CI, 81.4%-100%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 62.2%-84.6%) with pus, and 95.1% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.5%) and 67.5% (95% CI, 51.9%-80.0%) with lymph node samples, respectively. Other, less common sample types were also included. When CRS was also considered, specificity exceeded 93% for all sample types. Sensitivity was 100% with both smear-positive pulmonary and smear-positive extrapulmonary samples. Neither false rifampicin susceptibility testing results nor cross-reactivity with nontuberculous mycobacteria was detected.

Discussion: Xpert Ultra detected MTB in lymph node, tissue, and pus samples with high-accuracy comparable with the analysis of pulmonary samples while reducing the time to diagnosis by up to several weeks compared with mycobacterial culture.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测对肺和肺外标本的诊断性能:芬兰低发病率环境中的回顾性评估。
目的:目的是评估Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra)检测肺外结核(TB)的敏感性和特异性,并与芬兰首都赫尔辛基地区低发病率环境下的肺结核进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年收集的1112例肺样本和705例肺外样本,其中结核分枝杆菌(MTB)培养阳性193例和136例。将Xpert Ultra结果与分枝杆菌培养结果进行比较。PCR阳性和培养阴性病例分别与现有临床资料(综合参考标准,CRS)进行比较。结果:与培养相比,Xpert Ultra对肺标本的敏感性为95.3% (95% CI: 91.3-97.7%),特异性为94.5% (95% CI: 92.8-95.8%),对胸膜液的敏感性为47.1% (95% CI: 26.2-69.0%)和96.7% (95% CI: 93.8-98.4%),对组织的敏感性为100% (95% CI: 86.9-100%)和81.8% (95% CI: 72.4-88.6%),对脓液的敏感性为96.6% (95% CI: 81.4-100%)和75.0% (95% CI: 62.2-84.6%),对淋巴结标本的敏感性分别为95.1% (95% CI: 83.0-99.5%)和67.5% (95% CI: 51.9-80.0%)。其他不太常见的样本类型也包括在内。当考虑CRS时,所有样本类型的特异性均超过93%。对涂片阳性肺标本和涂片阳性肺外标本的敏感性均为100%。未发现假利福平药敏试验结果或与非结核分枝杆菌交叉反应。结论:Xpert Ultra在淋巴结、组织和脓液样本中检测MTB的准确性与肺样本的分析相当,同时与分枝杆菌培养相比,诊断时间缩短了数周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信