The effects of alpha/theta neurofeedback on mood, anxiety, emotion regulation and trait impulsivity

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Linda Dinc , Daniel Rybski , Jessica Dineen
{"title":"The effects of alpha/theta neurofeedback on mood, anxiety, emotion regulation and trait impulsivity","authors":"Linda Dinc ,&nbsp;Daniel Rybski ,&nbsp;Jessica Dineen","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research showed that neurofeedback improved mood, anxiety and addiction symptoms and enhanced optimum performance among musicians and artists. Although the alpha/theta protocol was used in some of these studies, the results have been inconsistent, this is in part due to limited or no use of mock-feedback control groups and the focus being on mostly clinical samples. The current study aimed to comprehensively assess the effects of alpha/theta neurofeedback on state and trait emotions. Twenty-five participants who met the criteria for at least moderate anxiety on GAD-7 were assigned to either real or mock-feedback and completed nine sessions over five weeks. Pre and post emotion dysregulation (DERS-SF), trait impulsivity (SUPPS-P), anxiety (GAD-7) was measured at S1 and S9, and state mood (PANAS) was assessed pre and post each session. The results revealed significant reduction in anxiety among real feedback group at post-S9, while the state negative mood improved for both groups at post sessions. There was no significant change in emotion dysregulation or trait impulsivity from pre to post neurofeedback. Real feedback group showed significant within session increase in their theta/alpha ratio while there was no significant difference between sessions. Overall, the findings suggest that alpha/theta neurofeedback is an effective intervention for anxiety and improves state mood but does not lead to change in traits such as emotion-based impulsivity and emotion dysregulation. This is the first study to comprehensively assess alpha/theta neurofeedback training on different dimensions of emotions in a simulation-controlled design, limitations and implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1866 ","pages":"Article 149943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325005062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research showed that neurofeedback improved mood, anxiety and addiction symptoms and enhanced optimum performance among musicians and artists. Although the alpha/theta protocol was used in some of these studies, the results have been inconsistent, this is in part due to limited or no use of mock-feedback control groups and the focus being on mostly clinical samples. The current study aimed to comprehensively assess the effects of alpha/theta neurofeedback on state and trait emotions. Twenty-five participants who met the criteria for at least moderate anxiety on GAD-7 were assigned to either real or mock-feedback and completed nine sessions over five weeks. Pre and post emotion dysregulation (DERS-SF), trait impulsivity (SUPPS-P), anxiety (GAD-7) was measured at S1 and S9, and state mood (PANAS) was assessed pre and post each session. The results revealed significant reduction in anxiety among real feedback group at post-S9, while the state negative mood improved for both groups at post sessions. There was no significant change in emotion dysregulation or trait impulsivity from pre to post neurofeedback. Real feedback group showed significant within session increase in their theta/alpha ratio while there was no significant difference between sessions. Overall, the findings suggest that alpha/theta neurofeedback is an effective intervention for anxiety and improves state mood but does not lead to change in traits such as emotion-based impulsivity and emotion dysregulation. This is the first study to comprehensively assess alpha/theta neurofeedback training on different dimensions of emotions in a simulation-controlled design, limitations and implications are discussed.
α / θ神经反馈对情绪、焦虑、情绪调节和特质冲动的影响。
先前的研究表明,神经反馈可以改善音乐家和艺术家的情绪、焦虑和成瘾,并提高他们的最佳表现。虽然在这些研究中使用了alpha/theta协议,但结果并不一致,部分原因是模拟反馈控制组的使用有限或没有使用,并且主要集中在临床样本上。本研究旨在全面评估α / θ神经反馈对状态情绪和特质情绪的影响。25名符合GAD-7中至少中度焦虑标准的参与者被分配到真实或模拟反馈中,并在五周内完成了九个疗程。在S1和S9测量情绪失调前后(DERS-SF)、特质冲动性(SUPPS-P)、焦虑(GAD-7),在每次治疗前后评估状态情绪(PANAS)。结果显示,真实反馈组在s9后的焦虑显著减少,而两组的状态消极情绪均有所改善。在神经反馈前和反馈后,情绪失调和特质冲动没有显著变化。真实组的θ / α比值在疗程内显著增加,而疗程之间没有显著差异。总的来说,研究结果表明,α / θ神经反馈对焦虑和状态情绪有有效的干预作用,但不会导致基于情绪的冲动和情绪失调等特征的改变。这是第一个在模拟控制研究中全面评估α / θ神经反馈训练对情绪不同方面的影响的研究,讨论了局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信