New standards in HER2-low testing: the CASI-01 comparative methods study.

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
David J Dabbs, Emina Torlakovic, Søren Nielsen, Suzanne C Parry, Jing Yu, Catherine Stoos, Beth Clark, Henrik Høeg, Jeppe Thagaard, Seshi R Sompuram, Stephen P Naber, Yukako Yagi, James Sayre, Kodela Vani, Mélissande Cossutta, Francoise Soussaline, Alexandre Papine, Nils A t'Hart, Matthias J Szabolcs, Bharat Jasani, Mary Kinloch, Luis Chiriboga, Keith Miller, Steve Bogen
{"title":"New standards in HER2-low testing: the CASI-01 comparative methods study.","authors":"David J Dabbs, Emina Torlakovic, Søren Nielsen, Suzanne C Parry, Jing Yu, Catherine Stoos, Beth Clark, Henrik Høeg, Jeppe Thagaard, Seshi R Sompuram, Stephen P Naber, Yukako Yagi, James Sayre, Kodela Vani, Mélissande Cossutta, Francoise Soussaline, Alexandre Papine, Nils A t'Hart, Matthias J Szabolcs, Bharat Jasani, Mary Kinloch, Luis Chiriboga, Keith Miller, Steve Bogen","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) has exposed clinically significant limitations in accurately detecting HER2-low expression testing when using immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays originally developed to detect HER2 over-expression. While HER2 testing is widely used to determine T-Dxd eligibility, no HER2-low assay was ever validated against HER2 protein expression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this pressing need, the Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry (CASI) conducted the CASI-01 study, involving 54 IHC laboratories across Europe and the U.S. The study aimed to identify optimal assay conditions for accurate HER2 testing, differentiating between HER2 overexpression (3+) for Trastuzumab eligibility and HER2-low expression (1+ or ultra-low) for T-Dxd eligibility. The conventional FDA-cleared HER2 assay (\"predicate\") was compared with higher-sensitivity assays using pathologist versus image analysis readouts. HER2 overexpression was validated against HER2 gene amplification via in situ hybridisation (ISH), while HER2-low accuracy was evaluated using newly introduced HER2 reference standards and a novel IHC parameter-dynamic range.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>CASI-01 revealed variability in predicate HER2 assays, with detection thresholds ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 among laboratories. Despite this variability, these assays demonstrated high accuracy for identifying HER2 overexpression (3+), with 85.7% (18/21) sensitivity (95% confidence limits 63.66-96.95%) and 100% (49/49) specificity (95% confidence limits 92.75-100%), though sensitivity may have been limited by the use of older tissue specimens, with loss or reduced expression levels of the HER2 protein. However, these same assays exhibited poor dynamic range for detecting HER2-low scores. Enhanced analytic sensitivity of IHC assays combined with image analysis overcame this limitation with HER2-low scores, achieving a six-fold improvement (p = 0.0017).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IHC assays with detection thresholds in the range of 30,000-60,000 HER2 molecules per cell yield accurate results for determination of Trastuzumab eligibility (HER2 3+) but fail to demonstrate the dynamic range for accurate HER2-low scores. Enhanced analytic sensitivity of HER2 assays combined with image analysis addresses this critical gap in HER2-low testing. More generally, CASI-01 introduces pivotal advancements in precision medicine: (a) the importance of reporting IHC analytic sensitivity and ability to demonstrate an assay dynamic range, and (b) image analysis can surpass pathologist readout accuracy in specific clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R44CA268484.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"120 ","pages":"105919"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) has exposed clinically significant limitations in accurately detecting HER2-low expression testing when using immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays originally developed to detect HER2 over-expression. While HER2 testing is widely used to determine T-Dxd eligibility, no HER2-low assay was ever validated against HER2 protein expression.

Methods: To address this pressing need, the Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry (CASI) conducted the CASI-01 study, involving 54 IHC laboratories across Europe and the U.S. The study aimed to identify optimal assay conditions for accurate HER2 testing, differentiating between HER2 overexpression (3+) for Trastuzumab eligibility and HER2-low expression (1+ or ultra-low) for T-Dxd eligibility. The conventional FDA-cleared HER2 assay ("predicate") was compared with higher-sensitivity assays using pathologist versus image analysis readouts. HER2 overexpression was validated against HER2 gene amplification via in situ hybridisation (ISH), while HER2-low accuracy was evaluated using newly introduced HER2 reference standards and a novel IHC parameter-dynamic range.

Findings: CASI-01 revealed variability in predicate HER2 assays, with detection thresholds ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 among laboratories. Despite this variability, these assays demonstrated high accuracy for identifying HER2 overexpression (3+), with 85.7% (18/21) sensitivity (95% confidence limits 63.66-96.95%) and 100% (49/49) specificity (95% confidence limits 92.75-100%), though sensitivity may have been limited by the use of older tissue specimens, with loss or reduced expression levels of the HER2 protein. However, these same assays exhibited poor dynamic range for detecting HER2-low scores. Enhanced analytic sensitivity of IHC assays combined with image analysis overcame this limitation with HER2-low scores, achieving a six-fold improvement (p = 0.0017).

Interpretation: IHC assays with detection thresholds in the range of 30,000-60,000 HER2 molecules per cell yield accurate results for determination of Trastuzumab eligibility (HER2 3+) but fail to demonstrate the dynamic range for accurate HER2-low scores. Enhanced analytic sensitivity of HER2 assays combined with image analysis addresses this critical gap in HER2-low testing. More generally, CASI-01 introduces pivotal advancements in precision medicine: (a) the importance of reporting IHC analytic sensitivity and ability to demonstrate an assay dynamic range, and (b) image analysis can surpass pathologist readout accuracy in specific clinical contexts.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R44CA268484.

HER2-low检测新标准:CASI-01比较方法研究。
背景:曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-Dxd)的引入暴露了在使用最初用于检测HER2过表达的免疫组织化学(IHC)检测时准确检测HER2低表达检测的临床显著局限性。虽然HER2检测被广泛用于确定T-Dxd的合格性,但目前还没有HER2低水平的检测被证实可以检测HER2蛋白的表达。方法:为了解决这一迫切需求,免疫组织化学分析标准化联盟(CASI)开展了CASI-01研究,涉及欧洲和美国的54个免疫组化实验室。该研究旨在确定准确检测HER2的最佳检测条件,区分曲妥珠单抗适格性的HER2过表达(3+)和T-Dxd适格性的HER2低表达(1+或超低)。将经fda批准的传统HER2检测(“谓词”)与使用病理学和图像分析读数的灵敏度更高的检测方法进行比较。通过原位杂交(ISH)验证HER2过表达是否能抑制HER2基因扩增,而使用新引入的HER2参考标准和新的IHC参数-动态范围评估HER2低准确性。研究结果:CASI-01揭示了谓词HER2测定的可变性,检测阈值在实验室中从30,000到60,000不等。尽管存在这种可变性,但这些检测方法在识别HER2过表达(3+)方面显示出很高的准确性,敏感性为85.7%(18/21)(95%置信限63.66-96.95%)和100%(49/49)特异性(95%置信限92.75-100%),尽管敏感性可能因使用较老的组织标本而受到限制,其中HER2蛋白表达水平丢失或降低。然而,这些检测方法在检测her2低评分时表现出较差的动态范围。免疫组化检测结合图像分析提高了分析灵敏度,克服了her2低评分的限制,实现了6倍的改善(p = 0.0017)。解释:IHC检测阈值在每个细胞30,000-60,000 HER2分子范围内,可准确确定曲妥珠单抗适性(HER2 3+),但无法显示准确的HER2低评分的动态范围。HER2检测与图像分析相结合,提高了分析灵敏度,解决了HER2低检测中的这一关键空白。更一般地说,CASI-01介绍了精准医学的关键进展:(a)报告免疫结构分析灵敏度和展示分析动态范围的能力的重要性,以及(b)在特定的临床环境中,图像分析可以超越病理学家读出的准确性。本研究由美国国立卫生研究院国家癌症研究所资助,资助号为R44CA268484。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信