Does Providing Free Trial Packs With Demonstration Plots Increase the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies? Cost Effectiveness Evidence From Tanzania

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Mywish K. Maredia, Jarrad Farris, Nicole M. Mason, Stephen Morgan
{"title":"Does Providing Free Trial Packs With Demonstration Plots Increase the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies? Cost Effectiveness Evidence From Tanzania","authors":"Mywish K. Maredia,&nbsp;Jarrad Farris,&nbsp;Nicole M. Mason,&nbsp;Stephen Morgan","doi":"10.1111/agec.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of the common practice of providing free trial packs alongside demonstration plots managed by local extension agents to promote learning-by-doing and increase technology adoption among bean farmers in Tanzania. The experiment randomly assigned some villages to forgo trial packs containing seeds and a seed treatment for 1 year. Adoption data were collected 1 and 4 years after the intervention. Our findings show that trial packs raised program costs by 37.5 times, but did not lead to a significant or cost-justified increase in adoption. The adoption of improved bean varieties increased from 11% pre-intervention to 28% 4 years post-intervention, with no significant difference between villages with and without trial packs. Although trial packs showed potential for specific groups—such as female, more educated farmers, households in farmer groups, and those living closer to demonstration plots or in smaller villages—their overall impact was limited. These results suggest that demonstration plots, a lower-cost intervention, are more cost-effective. Trial packs may still hold value when targeted, but their widespread use does not justify the additional costs. This study offers key insights for policymakers and development practitioners seeking to implement scalable, efficient agricultural interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 5","pages":"823-838"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the common practice of providing free trial packs alongside demonstration plots managed by local extension agents to promote learning-by-doing and increase technology adoption among bean farmers in Tanzania. The experiment randomly assigned some villages to forgo trial packs containing seeds and a seed treatment for 1 year. Adoption data were collected 1 and 4 years after the intervention. Our findings show that trial packs raised program costs by 37.5 times, but did not lead to a significant or cost-justified increase in adoption. The adoption of improved bean varieties increased from 11% pre-intervention to 28% 4 years post-intervention, with no significant difference between villages with and without trial packs. Although trial packs showed potential for specific groups—such as female, more educated farmers, households in farmer groups, and those living closer to demonstration plots or in smaller villages—their overall impact was limited. These results suggest that demonstration plots, a lower-cost intervention, are more cost-effective. Trial packs may still hold value when targeted, but their widespread use does not justify the additional costs. This study offers key insights for policymakers and development practitioners seeking to implement scalable, efficient agricultural interventions.

Abstract Image

提供免费试用包和示范地块能促进农业技术的采用吗?来自坦桑尼亚的成本效益证据
本研究评估了提供免费试用包和由当地推广机构管理的示范地块的普遍做法的有效性,以促进坦桑尼亚豆农边做边学并增加技术采用。试验随机分配一些村庄,在1年内放弃含有种子和种子处理的试验包。在干预后1年和4年收集收养数据。我们的研究结果表明,试用包将项目成本提高了37.5倍,但并没有导致采用率的显著或成本合理的增长。改良豆类品种的采用率从干预前的11%增加到干预后4年的28%,在有和没有试用包的村庄之间没有显著差异。尽管试验包显示出对特定群体的潜力,如女性、受教育程度较高的农民、农民群体中的家庭以及居住在示范地块附近或较小村庄的家庭,但其总体影响有限。这些结果表明,作为一种成本较低的干预措施,示范地块更具成本效益。试用包在有针对性的情况下可能仍然有价值,但它们的广泛使用并不能证明额外的成本是合理的。这项研究为寻求实施可扩展、高效的农业干预措施的政策制定者和发展从业者提供了关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信