Range-restricted species are poor proxies for functional diversity in the world's largest avifauna

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Montague H. C. Neate-Clegg, Samuel Eberhard, Camila Gómez, Sean Siddens, Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela
{"title":"Range-restricted species are poor proxies for functional diversity in the world's largest avifauna","authors":"Montague H. C. Neate-Clegg,&nbsp;Samuel Eberhard,&nbsp;Camila Gómez,&nbsp;Sean Siddens,&nbsp;Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation prioritization is critical in an era of global change and mass extinction, but it is complicated by the multiple facets of biodiversity that are often uncorrelated in space, especially at global scales. Yet, global scales are not the level pertinent to most conservation action; rather, conservation decision making is generally made at the country level, and this is particularly important for the most biodiverse countries on earth. Here, we evaluate congruence between three metrics of functional diversity and four metrics of taxonomic richness for the birds of Colombia, the country with the most bird species in the world. We report a high correlation between species and functional richness, and with threatened richness. However, the distribution of endemic and range-restricted species was a poor proxy for functional richness. Thus, for biodiverse countries such as Colombia, prioritizing species richness would be a suitable approach to conserving functional diversity, but it must be complemented with traditional conservation goals of preserving uniqueness (endemism) to avoid jeopardizing range-restricted species of high socio-ecological value.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation prioritization is critical in an era of global change and mass extinction, but it is complicated by the multiple facets of biodiversity that are often uncorrelated in space, especially at global scales. Yet, global scales are not the level pertinent to most conservation action; rather, conservation decision making is generally made at the country level, and this is particularly important for the most biodiverse countries on earth. Here, we evaluate congruence between three metrics of functional diversity and four metrics of taxonomic richness for the birds of Colombia, the country with the most bird species in the world. We report a high correlation between species and functional richness, and with threatened richness. However, the distribution of endemic and range-restricted species was a poor proxy for functional richness. Thus, for biodiverse countries such as Colombia, prioritizing species richness would be a suitable approach to conserving functional diversity, but it must be complemented with traditional conservation goals of preserving uniqueness (endemism) to avoid jeopardizing range-restricted species of high socio-ecological value.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在世界上最大的鸟类中,范围受限的物种不能很好地代表功能多样性
在全球变化和大规模灭绝的时代,保护优先级至关重要,但生物多样性的多个方面往往在空间上不相关,特别是在全球尺度上,这使其变得复杂。然而,全球尺度并不适用于大多数保护行动;相反,保护决策通常是在国家一级做出的,这对地球上生物多样性最丰富的国家尤其重要。在此,我们对世界上鸟类种类最多的国家哥伦比亚的鸟类进行了功能多样性指标和分类丰富度指标的一致性评估。我们报告了物种与功能丰富度以及受威胁丰富度之间的高度相关。然而,特有物种和范围限制物种的分布不能很好地代表功能丰富度。因此,对于像哥伦比亚这样的生物多样性国家来说,优先考虑物种丰富度将是保护功能多样性的合适方法,但它必须与保护独特性(特有性)的传统保护目标相辅相成,以避免危及具有高社会生态价值的范围限制物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信